Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:47:38.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Southern Selkups of Tomsk Province before and after 1991

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Florian Sobanski
Florian Sobanski*
Affiliation:
German Language Center, Eötvös Loránd University, Hungary
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Selkups, a linguistic community known as Ostyak Samoyeds until the middle of the twentieth century, currently exist in two separate territorial groups in the regions of west-central and northwestern Siberia. In all, 3,612 people identified themselves as Selkups in the last Soviet census of 1989. Since there is great divergence in dialects among the various groups, some specialists suggest classifying them as three different languages: Northern, Central, and Southern Selkup. Here the Selkups of Tomsk province, who speak the central and southern dialects, will be referred to collectively as Southern Selkups.

Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , March 2001 , pp. 171 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

2. Krauss, Michael, “The Indigenous Languages of the North: A Report on Their Present State,” in Hiroshi Shoji and Juha Janhunen, eds, Northern Minority Languages. Problems of Survival (Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology, 1997), p. 21.Google Scholar

3. Nekotorye istoricheskie i statisticheskie materialy o naselenii finno-ugorskoi gruppy i nekotorykh drugikh natsional'nostei (Moscow: Gosudarstvennyi komitet Rossiiskoi Federatsii po statistike, 1992), p. 197.Google Scholar

4. For an idea of the extent of Selkup settlement, consult the map included in Ruttkay-Miklián's article in this special issue.Google Scholar

5. In addition to the Selkups there lives a group of Khanty on the Vasiugan and some Evenk's on the Tym and Sym.Google Scholar

6. Numbers ranging between 200 and 400 were recorded in the Aleksandrovskoe, Kolpashevo, Parabel', and Upper Ket' districts. The figures originate from a count made by the organization Kolta-qup in 1991. See also the data provided in János Pusztay, A szölkupok (Szombathely: Savaria University Press, 1994), pp. 59ff.Google Scholar

7. V. I. Vasil'ev and S. M. Malinovskaia, Kontseptsiia natsional'no-politicheskogo, ekonomicheskogo i kul'turnogo razvitiia malochislennykh narodov Severa Tomskoi oblasti (Moscow: Institut etnologii i antropologii RAN, 1993), p. 7.Google Scholar

8. Nekotorye istoricheskie i stansucheskie materialy o naselenii finno-ugorskoi gruppy, pp. 197–198.Google Scholar

9. Vasil'ev and Malinovskaia, op. cit., p. 6.Google Scholar

10. Nekotorye istoricheskie i stansticheskie materialy o naselenii finno-ugorskoi gruppy, p. 201.Google Scholar

11. E. A. Khelimskii, “Sel'kupskii iazyk,” in V. P. Neroznak, ed., Krasnaia kniga iazykov narodov Rossii (Moscow: Academia, 1994), pp. 48–49.Google Scholar

12. G. I. Pelikh, Proiskhozhdenie sel'kupov (Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomskogo universiteta, 1972).Google Scholar

13. Narody Rossii. Entsiklopediia (Moscow: Bol'shaia Rossiiskaia Entsiklopediia, 1994), p. 312; Winfried Dallmann, “Indigene Völker im Norden Ruβlands und Sibiriens. Geographisch-ethnographischer Überblick,” Pogrom. Zeitschrift für bedrohte Völker, No. 180, 1995, p. 10.Google Scholar

14. Pusztay, See, op. cit., pp. 86ff.Google Scholar

15. Ibid., p. 39.Google Scholar

16. Donner, Kai, Bei den Samojeden in Sibirien (Stuttgart: Strecker & Schröder, 1926).Google Scholar

17. E. D. Prokof'eva, “K voprosu o sotsial'noi organizatsii sel'kupov (rod i fratriia),” Trudy instituta etnografii, new series, Vol. 18, 1952, pp. 88–107.Google Scholar

18. E. D. Prokof'yeva, 'The Sel'kups,“ in M. G. Levin and L. P. Potapov, eds, The Peoples of Siberia (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964), pp. 588, 603; Vasil'ev and Malinovskaia, op. cit., p. 6.Google Scholar

19. Katz, Hartmut, Selkupische Quellen. Ein Lesebuch (Vienna: VWGÖ, 1979); Iu. A. Morev, “Rol' rodnogo iazyka i obrazovaniia v natsional'nom vozrozhdenii sel'kupov,” Problemy dvuiazychiia i mnogoiazychiia v sovremennykh usloviiakh (Ioshkar-Ola: Mariiskoe knizhnoe izd-vo, 1993), p. 225.Google Scholar

20. Morev, “Rol' rodnogo iazyka.”Google Scholar

21. V. V. Bykonia, A. A. Kim and Sh. Ts. Kuper, Sëskui bukvar (Tomsk: Tomskii peda-gogicheskii institut, 1993), and Posobie po sel'kupskomu iazyku (Tomsk: Tomskii peda-gogicheskii institut, 1994).Google Scholar

22. See also Morev, “Rol' rodnogo iazyka,” pp. 219f.Google Scholar

23. Kuper, Simon and János Pusztay, “Sel'kupskii razgovornik. Narymskii dialekt,” Specimina Sibirica, Vol. 7, 1993.Google Scholar

24. Pusztay, op. cit., pp. 56ff.Google Scholar

25. This name, given by outsiders, was sometimes put in Selkup identification papers during the 1930s and 1940s. It is still casually used in colloquial speech.Google Scholar