Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:58:43.974Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

South Caucasus from 1918 to 1921: history and historical parallels with the contemporary era

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Anna Mkhoyan
Anna Mkhoyan*
Affiliation:
Global Studies Institute, Geneva, Switzerland
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The republics that make up the South Caucasus today gained brief independence after the fall of the Tsarist Empire, before the integration of the region into Bolshevik Russia. This period, even though short, gives interesting historical background to understand the present. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to study the South Caucasian republics from 1918 to 1921 at the regional and international levels, paying particular attention to the historical continuities with the contemporary era (since 1991). The results of the study show three main parallels between the early twentieth century (1918–1921) and the present. First, the region is still internally divided (e.g. the unresolved conflicts). Second, externally, it is torn between sometimes opposing powers (e.g. Russia and the Western powers). Finally, third, the partnerships with international or regional powers still remain asymmetrical; consequently, the need to cooperate with Russia exceeds the aspirations of the Western powers toward the South Caucasus. Based on archival research, this study contributes to the historiography of the region and gives a framework for understanding the South Caucasus in contemporary international relations.

Keywords

South CaucasusRussiaAlliesWestern powers
Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 45 , Issue 5 , September 2017 , pp. 910 - 927
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Arutyunyan, Yuri V. 2001. “Armyane v Moskve [Armenians in Moscow].” Accessed July 20, 2011. http://www.isras.ru/files/File/Socis/11-2001/Arutynyan.pdf.Google Scholar
Awde, Nicholas, and James Hill, Fred, eds. 2009. The Azerbaijanis: People, Culture and History. London: Bennett & Bloom.Google Scholar
Barkhoudaryan, V. B., ed. 2001. Patmut'yun: Hayoć patmutyunë hamašxarayin patmut'yan hamatek'stum [History: The History of Armenians in the Context of International History]. School Textbook for tenth year. Yerevan: Zangak-97.Google Scholar
Blank, Stephen. 1999. “Every Shark East of Suez: Great Power Interests, Policies and Tactics in the Transcaspian Energy Wars.” Central Asian Survey 18 (2): 149–184.Google Scholar
Bowker, Mike. 2011. “The War in Georgia and the Western Response.” Central Asian Survey 30 (2): 197–211.Google Scholar
Calzolari, Valentina. 2011. Les Apòtres Thaddée et Barthélemy. Aux origines du Christianisme Arménien. Brepols: Turnhout.Google Scholar
Carrère d'Encausse, Hélène. 2005. L'Empire d'Eurasie/Une histoire de l'Empire russe de 1552 à nos jours. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Cornell, Svante E. 2002a. Autonomy and Conflict: Ethnoterritoriality and Separatism in the South Caucasus – Cases in Georgia. Stockholm: Elanders Gotab. Accessed April 20, 2016. http://www.silkroadstudies.org/new/inside/publications/0419dissertation.pdf.Google Scholar
Cornell, Svante E. 2002b. “Autonomy as a Source of Conflict: Caucasian Conflicts in Theoretical Perspective.” World Politics 54 (2): 245–276.Google Scholar
Cornell, Svante E. 2006. “The Politicization of Islam in Azerbaijan.” Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and Silk Road Studies Program. Accessed April 20, 2016. http://www.silkroadstudies.org/resources/pdf/SilkRoadPapers/2006_10_SRP_Cornell_IslamAzerbaijan.pdf.Google Scholar
Djalili, Mohammad-Reza. 1995. “L'Iran et la Transcaucasie.” In Le Caucase postsoviétique: la transition dans le Conflit, edited by Djalili, Mohammad-Reza, 181–195. Bruxelles: Bruylant.Google Scholar
Djalili, Mohammad-Reza, and Kellner, Thierry. 2016. “Iran: La Nouvelle Puissance Régionale?” Question International 77: 4–18.Google Scholar
Geukjian, Ohannes. 2012. Ethnicity, Nationalism and Conflict in the South Caucasus: Nagorno-Karabakh and the Legacy of Soviet Nationalities Policy. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Gregorian, Vartan. 1972. “The Impact of Russia on the Armenians and Armenia.” In Russia and Asia, edited by Vucinich, Wayne S., 167–218. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hovannisian, Richard. 1967. Armenia on the Road to Independence. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hovannisian, Richard G. 1971. The Republic of Armenia. The First Year, 1918–1919. Vol. 1. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hovannisian, Richard. 1982. The Republic of Armenia. From Versailles to London: 1919–1920. Vol. 2. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hovannisian, Richard. 1994. “Historical Memory and Foreign Relations: The Armenian Perspective.” In The Legacy of History in Russia and the New States of Eurasia, edited by Starr, Frederick, 237–276. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Hovannisian, Richard. 1996. The Republic of Armenia, Vol. 3 (from London to Sèvres): February-August, 1920. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, Shireen. 1993. “Azerbaijan: Search for Identity and New Partners.” In Nations and Politics in the Soviet Successor States, edited by Bremmer, Ian and Taras, Ray, 225–260. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
IOM. 2008. “Migration in Armenia: A Country Profile.” Accessed June 20, 2016. http://iom.hu/PDF/migration_profiles2008/Armenia_Profile2008.pdf.Google Scholar
Jolicoeur, André. 1965. “De la reconnaissance En Droit International.” Les Cahiers de droit 6 (2): 85–92.Google Scholar
Lang, David Marshall. 1972. “A Century of Russian Impact on Georgia.” In Russia and Asia, edited by Vucinich, Wayne S., 219–247. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, Dov. 2004. Engaging Eurasia's Separatist States. Unresolved Conflicts and De Facto States. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
Mkhoyan, Anna. 2016. “Soft Power, Russia and the Former Soviet States: A Case Study of Russian Language and Education in Armenia.” International Journal of Cultural Policy. doi:10.1080/10286632.2016.1251426.Google Scholar
Mouradian, Claire. 1990. De Staline à Gorbatchev: Histoire d'une république soviétique, l'Arménie. Paris: Ramsay.Google Scholar
Pipes, Richard. 1959. “Demographic and Ethnographic Changes in Transcaucasia, 1897–1956.” Middle East Journal 13 (1): 41–63.Google Scholar
Sanders, Deborah. 2014. Maritine Power in the Black Sear. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Serrano, Silvia. 2007. “L'Eglise orthodoxe géorgienne, un référent identitaire ambigu.” In Religion et politique dans le Caucase post-soviétique, edited by Balci, Bayram and Motika, Raoul, 251–276. Paris: Maisonneuve & Larose.Google Scholar
Suny, Ronald Grigor, ed. 1996. Transcaucasia, Nationalism, and Social Change: Essays in the History of Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Suny, Ronald Grigor. 2010. “The Pawn of Great Powers: The East-West Competition for Caucasia.” Journal of Eurasian Studies 1 (1): 10–25.Google Scholar
de Waal, Thomas. 2002. “Reinventing the Caucasus.” World Policy Journal 19 (1): 51–59.Google Scholar
de Waal, Thomas. 2010. The Caucasus: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
de Waal, Thomas. 2012. “A Broken Region: The Persistent Failure of Integration Projects in the South Caucasus.” Europe-Asia Studies 64 (9): 1709–1723.Google Scholar
Yakemtchouk, Romain. 1999. Les hydrocarbures de la Caspienne: La compétition des puissances dans le Caucase et en Asie centrale. Brussels: Bruylant.Google Scholar
Westermann, W. L., Lawrence Martin, Major G. S., and Full Report of the Committee upon the Arbitration of the Boundary Between Turkey and Armenia Dwight, H. G., 1920, Hoover Institution Archives, Collection Title: United States. Committee upon the Arbitration of the Boundary Between Turkey and Armenia report, Collection Number: ZZ182, i, 1920.Google Scholar
“L'Arménie n'est pas admise dans la Société des Nations.” Assembly Document 251,20/48/251. Admission of Armenia to the League. LNA. Box: RF 1919-27. Section: No 28. Series 4209–4493.Google Scholar
“Lettre de Eric Drummond, Secrétaire général de la Société des Nations à Aharonian, président de la Délégation de la République d'Arménie, 20 décembre 1920”; Assembly Document 251,20/48/251. Admission of Armenia to the League. LNA. Box: RF 1919-27. Section: No 28. Series 4209–4493.Google Scholar
“Note sur la demande d'admission de la République d'Azerbaidjan dans la Société des Nations/Memorandum Présenté par le Secrétaire Général.” 1920. November 24. Admission to the League. LNA. Box: RF 1919-27. Section: No 28. Séries 201–332.Google Scholar
Records of the First Assembly. Plenary Meetings (Held from the November 15 to the December 18, 1920). LNA. 1920.Google Scholar
“21. Géorgie: Proposition de M. Brouckère (Annexe 12).” 1922. Eighth meeting. September 20. LNA. Proceedings of the Third Assembly/Sixth Committee (Political Issues). Geneva. 46 + Annexes 1–16.Google Scholar
Arual, F. 1920. “En Géorgie/Impressions de voyage: Le manganèse et son industrie.” Journal d'Orient, August 13. LNA. ChC, August-September 1920. Box: 39 (XII NCF).Google Scholar
Bammate, Haïdar. 1937. “La Turquie et le Caucase.” Le Caucase. Revue mensuelle. Paris. October. 5:5–12. LNA ChC. 1919-39. Box: 24.Google Scholar
Bardoux, Jacques. 1921. “La Conférence de Paris: Ses caractères, ses décisions, ses résultats.” L'Opinion, February 5. LNA. ChC. November 1920–January 1921. Box: 39 (Additional NCF).Google Scholar
Bernus, Pierre. 1920. “Les Etats-Unis, l'Europe et la Russie.” Journal des débats, August 14. LNA. ChC. August-September 1920. Box: 39 (XII NCF).Google Scholar
Bienaimé, Georges. 1920. “Un Effet de la menace bolchéviste/L'indépendance des républiques caucasiennes.” La Victoire, January 15. LNA. ChC. 1919–20. Box: 38 (IV NCF).Google Scholar
“Dans l'est européen/Les Etats baltiques et la conférence de Londres.” 1920. L'Europe Nouvelle, February 14. LNA. ChC. 1919–20. Box: 38 (V NCF).Google Scholar
Doumergue, Gaston. (Sénateur français). 1920. “Bulletin des affaires extérieures et coloniales.” Le Soir, January 24. LNA. ChC. 1919–20. Box: 38 (V NCF).Google Scholar
Kuhne, Emmanuel. 1920. La République arménienne.” La Tribune de Genève, February 28. LNA. ChC. 1919–20. Box: 38 (IV NCF).Google Scholar
“L'Accord anglo-bolchevistes.” 1921. Le Temps, March 20, LNA, ChC, March 1921, Box: 40 (Book 3).Google Scholar
“L'Accord arméno-géorgien.” 1920. Suisse-Orient, January 23. LNA. ChC. 1919–20. Box: 38 (IV NCF).Google Scholar
“La Guerre en Asie-Mineure.” 1920. Le Droit du peuple, December 17. LNA. ChC. November 1920-January 1921. Box: 39 (Additional NCF).Google Scholar
“La Lutte contre le bolchevisme/Les Etats-tampons.” 1920. Le Salut public, January 20. LNA. ChC. 1919–20. Box: 38 (V NCF).Google Scholar
“La Politique anglaise au Caucase.” 1920. L'Europe nouvelle, January 17. LNA. ChC. 1919–20. Box: 38 (V NCF).Google Scholar
“Le Problème russe au parlement anglais.” 1920. Economiste Parlementaire, February 19. LNA. ChC. 1919–20. Box: 38 (V NCF).Google Scholar
“Les Voies ferrées de l'Ukraine/Les Anglais sont dans les provinces baltiques, les Italiens en Géorgie, et les Français. …” 1920. France et Ukraine, March 12. LNA. ChC. 1919–20. Box: 38 (V NCF).Google Scholar
“Le Conseil suprěme et la Russie/Le point de vue militaire et le point de vue économique.” 1920a. Journal de Genève, January 21. LNA. ChC. 1919–20. Box: 38 (IV NCF).Google Scholar
“Le Conseil suprěme discute les affaires russes.” 1920. Echo de Paris, January 20. LNA. ChC. 1919–20. Box: 38 (V NCF).Google Scholar
Macler, Frédéric. 1920. “Les trois Républiques transcaucasiennes.” Correspondance d'Orient, August 15–30. LNA. ChC. August-September 1920. Box: 39 (XII N[ewspaper] C[lipping] F[iles]).Google Scholar
Moresthe, Georges. 1920. “L'Entente devant l'unité russe refaite par Lénine.” L'Ordre public, January 31. LNA. ChC. 1919–20. Box: 38 (V NCF).Google Scholar
Noskoff (Général). 1920. “L'Écroulement de la barrière caucasienne.” L'Opinion, December 18. LNA. ChC. November 1920-January 1921. Box: 39 (Additional NCF).Google Scholar
“Note adressée par le Secrétaire d'Etat Bainbridge Colby au Gouvernement italien [August 10, 1920].” 1920. Journal d'Orient, August 17. LNA. ChC. August-September 1920. Box: 39 (XII NCF).Google Scholar
Nozadsè, V. 1962. “Le Caucase et la politique du pétrole.” Le droit du peuple, February 16, 4–5, LNA, ChC, 1919–39, Box: 24.Google Scholar
“Républiques du Caucase.” 1920b. Journal de Genève, January 21. LNA. ChC. 1919–20. Box: 38 (IV NCF).Google Scholar
Saglio, Charles. 1920. “Les Communications terrestres sont coupées entre l'Asie et l'Europe.” L'œuvre, May 25. LNA. ChC. May-June 1920. Box: 38 (IX NCF).Google Scholar
“Société des Nations/Assemblée générale de Genève.” 1920. Gazette de Lausanne, November 27. LNA. ChC. November 1920-January 1921. Box: 39 (Additional NCF).Google Scholar
“Une Confédération transcaucasienne.” 1920. La Tribune de Genève, June 9. LNA. ChC. 1920–1. Box: 39 (X NCF).Google Scholar
Welter, G. (Ancien professeur à Moscou). 1920. “Le Caucase économique.” Le Mercure suisse, December 17–21. LNA. ChC. November 1920-January 1921. Box: 39A (Additional NCF).Google Scholar
“La République du Caucase.” 1918. Gazette de Lausanne, May 24. Le Temps: Archives historiques. Accessed July 2014. http://www.letempsarchives.ch/Default/Skins/LeTempsFr/Client.asp?Skin=LeTempsFr&enter=true&AW=1406551107264&AppName=2.Google Scholar
Westermann, W. L., Lawrence Martin, Major G. S., and Full Report of the Committee upon the Arbitration of the Boundary Between Turkey and Armenia Dwight, H. G., 1920, Hoover Institution Archives, Collection Title: United States. Committee upon the Arbitration of the Boundary Between Turkey and Armenia report, Collection Number: ZZ182, i, 1920.Google Scholar
“L'Arménie n'est pas admise dans la Société des Nations.” Assembly Document 251,20/48/251. Admission of Armenia to the League. LNA. Box: RF 1919-27. Section: No 28. Series 4209–4493.Google Scholar
“Lettre de Eric Drummond, Secrétaire général de la Société des Nations à Aharonian, président de la Délégation de la République d'Arménie, 20 décembre 1920”; Assembly Document 251,20/48/251. Admission of Armenia to the League. LNA. Box: RF 1919-27. Section: No 28. Series 4209–4493.Google Scholar
“Note sur la demande d'admission de la République d'Azerbaidjan dans la Société des Nations/Memorandum Présenté par le Secrétaire Général.” 1920. November 24. Admission to the League. LNA. Box: RF 1919-27. Section: No 28. Séries 201–332.Google Scholar
Records of the First Assembly. Plenary Meetings (Held from the November 15 to the December 18, 1920). LNA. 1920.Google Scholar
“21. Géorgie: Proposition de M. Brouckère (Annexe 12).” 1922. Eighth meeting. September 20. LNA. Proceedings of the Third Assembly/Sixth Committee (Political Issues). Geneva. 46 + Annexes 1–16.Google Scholar
“L'Arménie n'est pas admise dans la Société des Nations.” Assembly Document 251,20/48/251. Admission of Armenia to the League. LNA. Box: RF 1919-27. Section: No 28. Series 4209–4493.Google Scholar
“Lettre de Eric Drummond, Secrétaire général de la Société des Nations à Aharonian, président de la Délégation de la République d'Arménie, 20 décembre 1920”; Assembly Document 251,20/48/251. Admission of Armenia to the League. LNA. Box: RF 1919-27. Section: No 28. Series 4209–4493.Google Scholar
“Note sur la demande d'admission de la République d'Azerbaidjan dans la Société des Nations/Memorandum Présenté par le Secrétaire Général.” 1920. November 24. Admission to the League. LNA. Box: RF 1919-27. Section: No 28. Séries 201–332.Google Scholar
Records of the First Assembly. Plenary Meetings (Held from the November 15 to the December 18, 1920). LNA. 1920.Google Scholar
“21. Géorgie: Proposition de M. Brouckère (Annexe 12).” 1922. Eighth meeting. September 20. LNA. Proceedings of the Third Assembly/Sixth Committee (Political Issues). Geneva. 46 + Annexes 1–16.Google Scholar
Arual, F. 1920. “En Géorgie/Impressions de voyage: Le manganèse et son industrie.” Journal d'Orient, August 13. LNA. ChC, August-September 1920. Box: 39 (XII NCF).Google Scholar
Bammate, Haïdar. 1937. “La Turquie et le Caucase.” Le Caucase. Revue mensuelle. Paris. October. 5:5–12. LNA ChC. 1919-39. Box: 24.Google Scholar
Bardoux, Jacques. 1921. “La Conférence de Paris: Ses caractères, ses décisions, ses résultats.” L'Opinion, February 5. LNA. ChC. November 1920–January 1921. Box: 39 (Additional NCF).Google Scholar
Bernus, Pierre. 1920. “Les Etats-Unis, l'Europe et la Russie.” Journal des débats, August 14. LNA. ChC. August-September 1920. Box: 39 (XII NCF).Google Scholar
Bienaimé, Georges. 1920. “Un Effet de la menace bolchéviste/L'indépendance des républiques caucasiennes.” La Victoire, January 15. LNA. ChC. 1919–20. Box: 38 (IV NCF).Google Scholar
“Dans l'est européen/Les Etats baltiques et la conférence de Londres.” 1920. L'Europe Nouvelle, February 14. LNA. ChC. 1919–20. Box: 38 (V NCF).Google Scholar
Doumergue, Gaston. (Sénateur français). 1920. “Bulletin des affaires extérieures et coloniales.” Le Soir, January 24. LNA. ChC. 1919–20. Box: 38 (V NCF).Google Scholar
Kuhne, Emmanuel. 1920. La République arménienne.” La Tribune de Genève, February 28. LNA. ChC. 1919–20. Box: 38 (IV NCF).Google Scholar
“L'Accord anglo-bolchevistes.” 1921. Le Temps, March 20, LNA, ChC, March 1921, Box: 40 (Book 3).Google Scholar
“L'Accord arméno-géorgien.” 1920. Suisse-Orient, January 23. LNA. ChC. 1919–20. Box: 38 (IV NCF).Google Scholar
“La Guerre en Asie-Mineure.” 1920. Le Droit du peuple, December 17. LNA. ChC. November 1920-January 1921. Box: 39 (Additional NCF).Google Scholar
“La Lutte contre le bolchevisme/Les Etats-tampons.” 1920. Le Salut public, January 20. LNA. ChC. 1919–20. Box: 38 (V NCF).Google Scholar
“La Politique anglaise au Caucase.” 1920. L'Europe nouvelle, January 17. LNA. ChC. 1919–20. Box: 38 (V NCF).Google Scholar
“Le Problème russe au parlement anglais.” 1920. Economiste Parlementaire, February 19. LNA. ChC. 1919–20. Box: 38 (V NCF).Google Scholar
“Les Voies ferrées de l'Ukraine/Les Anglais sont dans les provinces baltiques, les Italiens en Géorgie, et les Français. …” 1920. France et Ukraine, March 12. LNA. ChC. 1919–20. Box: 38 (V NCF).Google Scholar
“Le Conseil suprěme et la Russie/Le point de vue militaire et le point de vue économique.” 1920a. Journal de Genève, January 21. LNA. ChC. 1919–20. Box: 38 (IV NCF).Google Scholar
“Le Conseil suprěme discute les affaires russes.” 1920. Echo de Paris, January 20. LNA. ChC. 1919–20. Box: 38 (V NCF).Google Scholar
Macler, Frédéric. 1920. “Les trois Républiques transcaucasiennes.” Correspondance d'Orient, August 15–30. LNA. ChC. August-September 1920. Box: 39 (XII N[ewspaper] C[lipping] F[iles]).Google Scholar
Moresthe, Georges. 1920. “L'Entente devant l'unité russe refaite par Lénine.” L'Ordre public, January 31. LNA. ChC. 1919–20. Box: 38 (V NCF).Google Scholar
Noskoff (Général). 1920. “L'Écroulement de la barrière caucasienne.” L'Opinion, December 18. LNA. ChC. November 1920-January 1921. Box: 39 (Additional NCF).Google Scholar
“Note adressée par le Secrétaire d'Etat Bainbridge Colby au Gouvernement italien [August 10, 1920].” 1920. Journal d'Orient, August 17. LNA. ChC. August-September 1920. Box: 39 (XII NCF).Google Scholar
Nozadsè, V. 1962. “Le Caucase et la politique du pétrole.” Le droit du peuple, February 16, 4–5, LNA, ChC, 1919–39, Box: 24.Google Scholar
“Républiques du Caucase.” 1920b. Journal de Genève, January 21. LNA. ChC. 1919–20. Box: 38 (IV NCF).Google Scholar
Saglio, Charles. 1920. “Les Communications terrestres sont coupées entre l'Asie et l'Europe.” L'œuvre, May 25. LNA. ChC. May-June 1920. Box: 38 (IX NCF).Google Scholar
“Société des Nations/Assemblée générale de Genève.” 1920. Gazette de Lausanne, November 27. LNA. ChC. November 1920-January 1921. Box: 39 (Additional NCF).Google Scholar
“Une Confédération transcaucasienne.” 1920. La Tribune de Genève, June 9. LNA. ChC. 1920–1. Box: 39 (X NCF).Google Scholar
Welter, G. (Ancien professeur à Moscou). 1920. “Le Caucase économique.” Le Mercure suisse, December 17–21. LNA. ChC. November 1920-January 1921. Box: 39A (Additional NCF).Google Scholar
“La République du Caucase.” 1918. Gazette de Lausanne, May 24. Le Temps: Archives historiques. Accessed July 2014. http://www.letempsarchives.ch/Default/Skins/LeTempsFr/Client.asp?Skin=LeTempsFr&enter=true&AW=1406551107264&AppName=2.Google Scholar