Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 November 2018
There have been Roma or Gypsies in Hungary for over 650 years. Historical records indicate that they entered Hungary between 1416 and 1417 from Transylvania during the reign of King Sigismund (1387–1437), though linguistic evidence indicates that they had begun to settle there earlier. In 1423, Sigismund granted the Gypsy leader, Ladislas, and his followers, certain rights of transit, and they began to flock to Hungary. Most settled in the outskirts of villages or towns, and became prominent in some parts of the country as blacksmiths.
From the outset, the Gypsies were subjected to varying degrees of discrimination. In the 18th century, Empress Maria Theresa (1740–1780), after Pope Clement XIII granted her the right to become Apostolic ruler of Hungary, adopted policies designed to force the Roma to assimilate into Hungarian society. She outlawed use of the word Cigány and decreed that Gypsies in the future be called “new citizen,” “new peasant,” or “new Hungarian.” In 1780, the government placed 8,388 Roma children in schools where they became wards of the state, and another 9,463 in foster homes. Within a few years, all of them had run away from these institutions or the families. The Gypsies responded with some outbreaks of violence in certain areas, though in most instances they simply left Hungary for other parts of Europe.
1. Vekerdi, Józcef, “Earliest Arrival Evidence on Gypsies in Hungary,” Journal of the Gypsy Lore Society, Volume I, Number 2 (1976), pp. 170–171; Miklos Tomka, “Die Zigeuner in der ungarischen Gesellschaft,” East European Quarterly, Volume IV, No. 1 (March 1970), p. 3; László Siklós, “The Gypsies,” The New Hungarian Quarterlv, Volume XI, Number 40 (1970), p. 150; one of Hungary's most important historical figures, Sigismund, became Holy Roman Emperor in 1410 and King of Bohemia in 1420. Denis Sinor, History of Hungary (Westport: Greenwood Press Publishers, 1976), pp. 60-103, Passim; Rena C. Gropper mentions in her Gypsies in the City: Culture Patterns and Survival (Princeton: The Darwin Press, 1975), pp. 7-8, that as a result of a rebellion among Gypsy slaves in Hungary in 1383 that “Sigismund of Hungary gave a group called the Sincani the right to choose their own leaders. “Sigismund, however, did not become King of Hungary until 1387, and was not in a position to grant such rights prior to this time.Google Scholar
2. Clébert, Jean-Paul, The Gypsies, translated by Charles Doff (New York: E.P. Dutton & Co., 1963), p.71; Victor S. Mamatey, The Rise of the Hapsburg Empire, 1526–1815 (New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc., 1971), p. 118; Jean-Pierre Liégeois, Gypsies and Travellers (Strasburg: Council for Cultural Cooperation, 1987), p. 99; Andrew Arjeh Marchbin, “A Critical History of the Origin and Migration of the Gypsies,” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, 1939), notes the Magyar terms for “New Settlers” is Ujlakosok and for “New Hungarians” is Ujmagyarok; Siklós, p. 157; Konrad Bucovici, The Story of the Gypsies (New York: Cosmopolitan Book Corporation, 1928), pp. 91-93; Donald Kenrick and Grattan Puxon, The Destiny of Europe's Gypsies (Basic Books, Inc., Publishers, 1972), pp. 50–51.Google Scholar
3. Bercovici, pp. 92-93, says 220 Gypsies were executed, while Dr. Ian F. Hancock, in “Some Contemporary Aspects of Gypsies and Gypsy Nationalism, “Roma, Volume I, Number 2 (1975), pp. 46'56, observes that “nearly 200 Gypsies were tortured, many beheaded, quartered and hung…; “ Clébert, p. 73, notes that only 45 Gypsies were executed; Liégeois, pp. 99-100; on the other hand, Joseph II “freed the Jews from most of the civil disabilities under which they suffered,” and issued the Serfdom Patent in 1781 that emancipated Austrian serfs. Mamatey, pp. 131-133; Tomka, p. 4.Google Scholar
4. Ibid., pp. 4-5; Siklós, p. 155, indicates that 49,000 of them did handicraft work (34,000 males and 15,000 women) ¡ Tarns Ervin and Révész Y. Tarns, Búcsú a cigányteleptöl [Farewell to the Gypsy Quarter] (Budapest : Kossuth Könyvykiadó, 1977), p. 11; J. Vekerdi, review of Balint Sarosi, Cigányzene [Gypsy Music] (Budapest : Gondolat Press, 1971), in Journal of the Gypsy Lore Society, 3rd Series, Volume I (1972), p. 50.Google Scholar
5. Macartney, C.A., A History of Hungary: 1929–1945 (New York: Frederick A. Praeger, Inc., 1956), pp. 14-15, 69-70; G.C. Paikert, “Hungary's National Minority Policies, 1920–1945,” The American Slavic and East European Review, Volume XII, Number 2 (1953), pp. 202-207, 211; Andrew C. Janos, Politics of Backwardness in Hungary, 1825–1945 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1982), pp. 205, 233, 253, 282.Google Scholar
6. Janos, p. 205; Paikert, pp. 202, 208-210, 215, 217; László Kövagó, Nemzetiseqek a mai Magyarországon [Nationalities in Today's Hungary] (Budapest: Kossuth, 1981), p. 9; Kenrick and Puxon, p. 183.Google Scholar
7. Ibid., pp. 124-125, 183; Kazimierz Smolen, Auschwitz, 1940–1945 (Oswiecimiu: Pánstwowe Muzeum Oswiecimiu, 1969), pp. 2122; Bohdan Wytwycky, The Other Holocaust: Many Circles of Hell (Washington: The Nowak Report, 1980), pp. 36-38; Christian Bernadac, L'Holocauste Oublié: Le massacre des Tsiganes [The Forgotten Holocaust: The Massacre of the Gypsies], (Paris: Editions France-Empire, 1979), pp. 412'413.Google Scholar
8. Between 1946-47, Hungary expelled 228,604 ethnic Germans, while another 31,396 fled the country and, in 1946-48, forced 73,373 Slovaks to leave in an exchange agreement with Czechoslovakia. Thomas Spira, “Worlds Apart: The Swabian Expulsion from Hungary after World War II,” Nationalities Papers, Volume XIII, Number 2 (Fall 1985), p.197; Robert R. King, Minorities under Communism: Nationalities as a Force of Tension among Balkan Communist States (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1973), pp. 52-53; Stalin criticized the concept of “Cultural Autonomy.” He felt that though a minority group could have its own schools and languages, it would contradict the “spirit of Proletarian Internationalism” to allow them any more distinct cultural privileges than this. Steven Revay, “Hungarian Minorities under Communist Rule, The Hungarian Quarterly 1 October 1961), pp. 42-47; Bertram D. Wolfe, Three Who Made a Revolution (New York: Dell Publishing Co., 1964), p. 400.Google Scholar
9. Vago, Raphael, “Nationality Policies in Contemporary Hungary,” Hungarian Studies Review, Volume XI, Number 1 (Spring 1984), p. 45; Constitution of the Hungarian People's Republic (Budapest 1959), p. 31; Linda Degh, “Ethnology in Hungary,” East European Quarterlv , Volume VI, Number 3 (September 1970), p. 297; Ivan Volgyes, “Legitimacy and Modernization: Nationality and Nationalism in Hungary and Transylvania,” in George Kline and Milan F. Reban, eds., The Politics of Ethnicity in Eastern Europe (Boulder: East European Monographs, distributed by Columbia University Press, 1981), p. 135.Google Scholar
10. Shoup, Paul S., The East European and Soviet Data Hanbook (New York: Columbia University Press, 1981), p. 137; Siklós, p. 151; Tomka, p. 8.Google Scholar
11. Kosa, László, “Thirty Years of Ethnographic Research Among the National Minority Groups Living in Hungary (1945–1974),” Acta Ethnographica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, Volume 24, Numbers 3-4 (1975), p. 32; “National Minorities in the Hungarian People's Republic,” Hungary 1971 ed. by Miklos Gardos (Budapest: Zrinyi Publishing House, 1971), pp. 135'136.Google Scholar
12. The creation of the Cigányszövetsvég was officially announced 20 October 1957 in Népakarat, Gratton Puxon, Rom: Europe's Gypsies , Report No. 14 (London: Minority Rights Group, 1973), p. 16; Shoup, p. 137; Siklós, p. 151, says that the official figure was about “one-tenth the actual number.”Google Scholar
13. Hajdu, Mihaly, “Gypsies, 1980,” Hungarian Digest 6 (1980), pp. 32-33. Official justification for this change was that the Gypsies lacked one or more of Stalin's criteria for nationality status, which included common language, territory, economy, and culture. Consequently, they were nothing more “than…a social problem.” In 1964, there was some disagreement among Gadjo (non-Gypsy) specialists over this. One suggested, as with other minorities, the official recognition of Romani, the Gypsy language, and the creation of special schools for Gypsies; Puxon, Rom (1973), p. 16; Ervin and Tamás, p. 16.Google Scholar
14. “The Gypsies,” East Europe, Volume 14, Number 10 (October 1965), pp. 21, 23. “Discrimination,” East Europe, Volume 8, Number 12 (December 1959), n.p.; Puxon, Rom (1973), p. 14.Google Scholar
15. Fél, Edit and Hofer, Tamás, Proper Peasants: Traditional Life in a Hungarian Village (Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1969), pp. 247, 294-295, 346-347, 357, 378.Google Scholar
16. Heinrich, Hans-Georg, Hungary: Politics, Economics, and Society (Boulder: Lynne Reimer Publishers, Inc., 1986), p. 139.Google Scholar
17. Hajdu, p. 33; Siklós, pp. 153-154.Google Scholar
18. Rózsa, László, “Gypsies and Public Opinion,” The Hungarian Quarterly, Volume XX, Number 73 (Spring 1979), p. 128; Zita Réger, “Bilingual Gypsy Children in Hungary: Explorations in Natural Sound-Language Acquisition at an Early Age,” International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 19 (1979), p. 80, note. 1, states that the Gypsies now made up 3.2% of the Hungarian Population; Siklós, p. 151, notes that there were over 3,200 villages and 70 towns in Hungary at this time; Hajdu, p. 30, says that the figure of 320,000 was determined from a sociological survey done in Hungary in 1971; Tomka, p. 14.Google Scholar
19. Siklós, p. 154; Hajdu, pp. 31-33; Karl Jokisch, “Ziguener-Fremdgebliebene unter ums,” Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, Number 12 (21 March 1981), p. 5; in Atány, the government program had enabled Gypsies to build five homes in the village proper. Unfortunately, they housed eleven families, and living conditions were not much different from the small crowded abodes “built in the Gypsy Way.” Fél and Hofer, p. 247, note 20; Puxon, Rom: Europe's Gypsies, Report No. 14 (London: Minority Rights Group, 1980), pp. 12-13, states that there were 65,000 Gypsies in Budapest by 1974.Google Scholar
21. Rózsa, p. 126; Puxon, Rom: Europe’ s Gypsies, Report No. 14 (London: Minority Rights Group, 1987) p. 10.Google Scholar
22. Puxon, Rom (1973), p. 16. This figure rose to 15,000 by the early 1970’ s; Puxon, Rom (1980), p. 13. Andras Faludi, Cigányok… (Budapest: Kossuth Konyvkiado, p. 9; Puxon, Rom: Europe’ s Gypsies, Report No. 14 (London: Minority Rights Group, 1975) p. 13.Google Scholar
23. Siklós, p. 156; Rózsa, pp. 127-128, 130.Google Scholar
24. Siklós, p. 157.Google Scholar
25. Hajdu, p. 30.Google Scholar
26. Siklós, p. 158; Rózsa, pp. 127-128; a government survey in 1971 estimated that 21.2% of Hungary's Gypsies were bilingual. Over half spoke “the Lovari dialect of the Romani language,” with those speaking Lovari making up the Vlach (Wallachian) Gypsy group in Hungary. The country's second Gypsy group were the Romanian dialect Gypsies, who made up 7.2% of Hungary’ s Gypsies. The last group were “monolingual Gypsies,” who spoke Magyar, and were known as Romungros, Réger, p. 80.Google Scholar
27. In 1970-71, Gypsy children made up 5.3% of the general student population in Hungarian schools, a figure that rose to 6.2% by 1978-79. In 1972, “three in every ten six-year-old child is of Gypsy origin. “ Ibid., p. 80; Gypsy population estimates for this period were 320,000 (3.2% of population) in 1970, Rózsa, p. 128; Sikl6s, p. 151, and Hajdu, p. 30, estimate that there were 300,000-400,000 Roma in Hungary at this time. By 1979, they estimated this figure to be about 350,000; Puxon, Rom (1973), p. 23, says there were 480,000 in 1970.Google Scholar
28. Réger, p. 60.Google Scholar
29. Rózsa, p. 128; Puxon, Rom (1987), p. 10.Google Scholar
30. Siklós, p. 160; Puxon, Rom (1987), p. 10.Google Scholar
31. Puxon, Rom (1975); Gratton Puxon, “Gypsies: Blacks of East Europe,” The Nation, Volume 222 (April 17, 1976), p. 463.Google Scholar
32. Puxon, Rom (1987), p. 10.Google Scholar
33. Hajdu, p. 34; Siklós, p. 162.Google Scholar
34. Hann, C.M., Tázár: A Village in Hungary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980), pp. 154'155.Google Scholar
35. Pártos, Ferenc, “A cigány és nem cigány lakossg vélémenge a föbb társadalompolitikai célkitüzésekrol” [Gypsies and Non-Gypsies on the Main Goals of Social Policy] Szociológia, Volume I (1980), pp. 3, 14-16; Heinrich, pp. 139-140.Google Scholar
36. Kenedi, János, “Why is the Gypsy the Scapegoat and Not the Jew?” East European Reporter, Volume 2, Number 1 (Spring 1986), pp. 11'14.Google Scholar
37. Staar, Richard F., Yearbook on International Communist Affairs, 1987 (Stanford: Hoover Institution Press, 1987), p. 301; Hajdu, p. 30; Puxon, Rom (1987), p. 10, predicts that the number of Gypsies will be 1 1/2 million by 2027; Staar, pp. 303'304.Google Scholar
38. Heinrich, pp. 100, 121-124; for more details on the Hungarian housing problems, see Ivan Szelenyi, “Housing System and Social Structures,” The Sociological Review, Monograph 17: Sociological Studies, ed. by Paul Halmos (Keele: University of Keele, 1972), pp. 269'298, passim. Google Scholar
39. Cozannet, Francoise, “Gypsies and the Problem of Acculturation,” Diogenes, Number 95 (Fall 1976), p. 69; Hajdu, P. 34.Google Scholar
40. Ibid., p. 34.Google Scholar