Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:33:18.873Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of the EU in promoting good governance in Macedonia: towards efficiency and effectiveness or deliberative democracy?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Marija Risteska
Marija Risteska*
Affiliation:
CRPM, Skopje, Macedonia
*
∗Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Good governance has been used as a development tool by international organizations and the European Union (hereinafter: EU) which has included it in cooperation agreements and promotes it within its Enlargement Policy. This paper analyzes the good governance approach in the EU's relations with Macedonia and its effects on the country's democratic policy making. The analysis shows that the Europeanization of Macedonia has an impact on the democratic processes in the country with sub-optimal results as its technocratic approach in assessing the country's readiness for EU membership has proved to be detrimental for the deliberative democratic processes. The intensive pressure for effectiveness and efficiency results in finding short cuts in rule transfer through copying and pasting legislation from member states and limiting the democratic policy making to political deliberation rather than to wide policy consultations between state and non-state actors.

Keywords

Europeanizationgood governanceeffectivenessefficiencydeliberative decision makingMacedonia
Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 41 , Issue 3: Special Issue: Europeanization, State-Building and Democratization in the Western Balkans , May 2013 , pp. 431 - 446
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Börzel, Tanja. 2009. “Transformative Power Europe? The EU Promotion of Good Governance in Areas of Limited Statehood”, ERD Workshop “Transforming Political Structures: Security, Institutions, and Regional Integration Mechanisms”, Florence, April 16–17.Google Scholar
Bumeli, P. 2000. Democracy Assistance: International Cooperation for Democratization. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Carothers, Thomas. 2002. “The End of the Transition Paradigm.” Journal of Democracy 13 (1).Google Scholar
Chandler, David. 2006. Empire in Denial: The Politics of Statebuilding. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Chowdhury, N., and Skarstedt, C. E. 2005. “The principle of good governance.” A Legal Working Paper in the CISDL “Recent Developments in International Law Related to Sustainable Development” Series.Google Scholar
Dimitrova, A. 2002. “Enlargement, Institution Building and EU's Administrative Capacity Requirement.” West European Politics 25 (4): 171–190.Google Scholar
FRIDE Activity brief, 5 June 2009. “The Road from Skopje to Brussels: Macedonian Euro-Atlantic Integration Challenges”.Google Scholar
Fuster, Thomas. 1998. Die “Good Governance” Diskussion der Jahre 1989 bis 1994: Ein Beitrag zur jüngeren Geschichte der Entwicklungspolitik unter spezieller Berücksichtigung der Wellbank und des DAC. Bern/Stuttgart: Haupt.Google Scholar
Gabanyi, Anneli Ute. 2005. “Rumänien vordem EU-Beitritt.” SWP-Studie 31: 28.Google Scholar
Gabanyi, Anneli Ute. 2006. “Rumänien und Bulgarien – EU-Beitritt 2007 mit Auflagen.” SWP-Aktuell 2006(A 27).Google Scholar
Grabbe, Heather. 1999. “A Partnership for Accession? The Implications of EU Conditionality for the Central and East European Applicants.” Robert Schuman Centre Working paper 12(99). San Domenico di Fiesole: European Institute.Google Scholar
Grabbe, Heather. 2006. The EU's Transformative Power: Europeanizalion Through Conditionality in Central and Eastern Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Héritier, A. 2003. “New Modes of Governance in Europe: Increasing Political Capacity and Policy Effectiveness?” In The State of the European Union, 6 – Law, Politics, and Society, edited by Börzel, T. A. and Cichowski, R., 105–126. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Interview with Jana Stojkova, Republic of Macedonia's Government Sector for Economic Policies and Regulatory Reform, 19 October 2011.Google Scholar
Interview with Cvetanka Ivanova, Member of Parliament and Head of the Commission for labor and social policy, December 2011.Google Scholar
Interview with Aleksandar Popovski, Head of legal department, Ministry of economy, December 2011.Google Scholar
Ioakimides, P. 2002. “European Union and the Greek state”. cited in “Europe and the Balkans: Membership Aspiration, EU involvement and Europeanization Capacity in South Eastern Europe.” L. Demetropoulou.“ Southeast European Politics 3 (2–3): 89.Google Scholar
König, K., and Adam, Markus, eds. 2001. Governance als entwicklungspolitischer Ansatz, Forscluingssynmosium. September 2000. Speyer: Hochschule für Verwaltungswissenschaften Speyer.Google Scholar
Krastev, Ivan. 2002. “The Balkans: Democracy Without Choices.” Journal of Democracy 13 (3).Google Scholar
“Law on Free Access to Information of Public Character.” Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia 13/2006; 86/2008 and 6/2010.Google Scholar
Levi, Margaret, and Sacks, Audrey. 2005. “Achieving Good Government—And, Maybe, Legitimacy.” Paper presented at the Arusha conference “New frontiers of social policy.”.Google Scholar
Mcfaul, M. 2004-2005. “Democracy Promotion as a World Value.” The Washington Quarterly 28 (1): 147–163.Google Scholar
Noutcheva, Gergana, Tocci, Nathalie, Coppieters, Bruno, Kovziridze, Tamara, Emerson, Michael, and Huysseune, Michel. 2004. “Europeanization and Secessionist Conflicts: Concepts and Theories.” Journal of Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe 5 (1): 1–35.Google Scholar
Noutcheva, Gergana. 2007. Fake, Partial and Imposed Compliance: The Limits of the EU's Normative Power in the Western Balkans.Google Scholar
OSCE Conference. 2011. “Better Regulation Policy as a Tool for Enhancing the Rule of Law.” Skopje.Google Scholar
Risteska, M., Page, A., and Spasovska, N. 2010. “Monitoring of the Implementation and Ex-post Evaluation of the Legislation – Comparative Experiences, Options and Capacities.” OSCE.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F. W. 1999. Governing Europe. Effective and Legitimate? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank, and Sedelmeier, Ulrich. 2004. “Governance by Conditionality: EU Rule Transfer to the Candidate Countries of Central and Eastern Europe.” Journal of European Public Policy 11 (4): 661–679.Google Scholar
Schwellnus, G. 2008. “Minority Protection as a Condition for Membership.” In Questioning EU Enlargement, edited by Sjursen, H., 186–200. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Siljanovska Davkova, Gordana. 2001. “Macedonian Transition – From Unitary Toward Binational State.” co-author. Magor: Skopje.Google Scholar
Vachudova Milada, Anna. 2003. “Strategies for Democratization and European Integration of the Balkans.” In The Enlargement of the European Union, edited by Cremona, Marise, 141–160. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, Susan. 2011. “Varieties of State-Building in the Balkans: A Case for Shifting Focus.” In Advancing Conflict Transformation. The Berghof Handbook II, edited by Austin, B., M. Fischer and H. J. Giessmann. Opladen/Framington Hills: Barbara Budrich Press.Google Scholar

Internet sources

Boege, V., Brown, A., Clements, K., and Nolan, A. “On Hybrid Political Orders and Emerging States: State Formation in the Context of ‘Fragility’ Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management. Web 04 September 2012. <http://edoc.vifapol.de/opus/volltexte/2011/2595/pdf/boege_etal_handbook.pdf>>Google Scholar
COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2008–2009 [COM(2008) 674 final] Web 04 September 2012. <http://ee.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/press_eorner/key-documents/reports_nov_2008/strategy_paper_incl_eountry_conclu_en.pdf>>Google Scholar
COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2009–2010 [COM(2009) 533 final] Web. 04 September 2012. <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2009:0533:FIN:EN:PDF>>Google Scholar
COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2010–2011, [COM(2010) 660] Web. 04 September 2012. <http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2010/package/strategy_paper_2010_en.pdf>>Google Scholar
COUNCIL DECISION of 18 February 2008 on the principles, priorities and conditions contained in the Accession Partnership with the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and repealing Decision 2006/57/EC [EC(2008) 212] Web. 04 September 2012. <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri-OJ:L:2008:080:0032:0045:EN:PDF>>Google Scholar
Enlargement of the European Union: An historic opportunity, European Commission 2001. Web. 04 September 2012. http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/press_corner/publications/corpus_en.pdf Google Scholar
Radio Free Europe interview with Commissioner Füle from November, 2011 Web. 04 September 2012. <http://www.makdenes.org/content/article/24377868.html>>Google Scholar
REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION. The Stabilisation and Association process for South East Europe. First Annual Report. [COM(2002) 163 final, p.3] Web. 04 September 2012. <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUnServ.do?uri=COM:2002:0163:FIN:EN:PDF>>Google Scholar
Report from the Commission – The Stabilisation and Association process for South East Europe – Second Annual Report {SEC (2003) 339; SEC (2003) 340; SEC (2003) 341; SEC (2003) 342; SEC (2003) 343}. [COM(2003)139, p.1] Web. 04 September 2012. <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc7smartapucelexpliislpiocllCELEXnumdoc&lg=en&numdoc=503DC0139 >>Google Scholar
Report from the Commission – The Stabilisation and Association process for South East Europe – Third Annual Report}. [COM(2004)202] Web. 04 September 2012. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=en&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2004&nu_doc=202 Google Scholar
Stabilization and Association Agreement between the European community and member states and former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Council of the European Union 6726/01 Web 08 February 2013 http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/the_former_yugoslav_republic_of_macedonia/saa03_01_en.pdf Google Scholar