Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T05:15:22.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rethinking Russia From Zardob: Hasan Melikov Zardabi and the “Native” Intelligentsia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Austin Jersild
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Many non-Russians in the Russian Empire were active members of imperial educated society (obshchestvo), and they often conceived of the colonial advance of Russia as part of the march of the progressive West and “civilization” itself into the backward lands of the East. Reformist empire builders who criticized the brutal wars and population transfers that marked the conquest of the southern borderlands also emphasized the civilizing mission of the empire on its eastern frontier. This article explores the conception of Russia and its empire in the work of the Azerbaijani publicist Hasan Melikov Zardabi. Zardabi was genuinely enthusiastic about Russia and the prospect of an enlightened imperial future for the lands of the former khanates on the frontier of the Iranian and Ottoman empires. The unusual circumstances of his life, however, which included exile to his remote and native village of Zardob, a small fishing village on the Kura River to the west of Baku, compelled him to re-evaluate his estimation of Russia and the benefits of imperial rule. Zardabi learned from his experience in Zardob, and grew to rethink his earlier views about civilization and the Russian Empire.

Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , September 1999 , pp. 503 - 517
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Valikhanov, Chokhan, “O Islame na stepe,” ca. 1863, in Chokhan Valikhanov: Izbrannye proizvedeniia, introduced by A. Kh. Margulan (Moscow: Izd-vo “Nauka,” Glav. red. vostochnoi lit-ry, 1986), p. 294.Google Scholar

2. For recent work on Russia as an empire, see Andreas Kappeler, La Russie Empire Multiethnique , trans. Guy Imart (Paris: Institut d'Études Slaves, 1994); Mark Von Hagen, “Writing the History of Russia as Empire: The Perspective of Federalism,” in Catherine Evtuhov, Boris Gasparov, Alexander Ospovat and Mark Von Hagen, eds, Kazan, Moscow, St. Petersburg: Multiple Faces of the Russian Empire [Kazan', Moskva, Peterburg: Rossiiskaia imperiia vzgliadom iz raznykh uglov] (Moscow: OGI, 1997), pp. 393–410; Karen Barkey and Mark von Hagen, eds, After Empire: Multiethnic Societies and Nation-Building (Boulder, Westview Press, 1997); and various essays in Daniel R. Brower and Edward J. Lazzerini, eds, Russia's Orient: Imperial Borderlands and Peoples, 1700–1917 (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1997), and Jane Burbank and David L. Ransel, eds, Imperial Russia: New Histories for the Empire (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

3. Cited in Alan W. Fisher, “A Model Leader for Asia, Ismail Gaspirali,” in Edward A. Allworth, ed., The Tatars of Crimea: Return to the Homeland, 2nd edn (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1998), p. 34. Also see Alexandre Bennigsen and Chantal Lemercier-Quelquejay, La Presse et le Mouvement National chez les musulmans de Russie avant 1920 (Paris: Mouton, 1964), pp. 35–43; Edward J. Lazzerini, “Ǧadidism at the Turn of the Twentieth Century: A View from Within,” Cahiers du monde russe et soviétique, Vol. 16, No. 2, 1975, pp. 245–277; Edward J. Lazzerini, “Ismail Bey Gasprinskii (Gaspirali): The Discourse of Modernism and the Russians,” in Allworth, ed., pp. 48–70; Alexandre A. Bennigsen, “Ismail Bey Gasprinskii (Gaspraly) and the Origins of the Jadid Movement in Russia,” introduction to Ismail Bei Gasprinskii, Russkoe Musul'manstvo (Oxford: Society for Central Asian Studies, 1985), pp. 5–20; Alexandre Bennigsen and Chantal Lemercier-Quelquejay, Islam in the Soviet Union, trans. Geoffrey E. Wheeler and Hubert Evans (New York: Frederick A. Praeger, 1967), pp. 31–48; M. A. Usmanov, “O Triumfe i Tragedii idei Gasprinskogo,” in Ismail Bei Gasprinskii, Rossiia i Vostok (Kazan, 1993), pp. 3–15; L. I. Klimovich, “Na sluzhbe prosveshcheniia: o pervoi tiurkoiazychnoi gazete ‘Terdzhiman’ i ee izdatele I. Gasprinskom,” in Gasprinskii, Rossiia i Vostok, pp. 98–121; Kappeler, La Russie Empire Multiethnique, pp. 203–206.Google Scholar

4. Audrey Altstadt-Mirhadi, “The Forgotten Factor: The Shi'i Mullahs of Pre-Revolutionary Baku,” in Ch. Lemercier-Quelquejay, G. Veinstein and S. E. Wimbush, eds, Passé Turco-Tatar Présent Sovietique (Paris: Editions Peeters, 1986), p. 357, and Audrey Altstadt-Mirhadi, “Baku: Transformation of a Muslim Town,” in Michael F. Hamm, ed., The City in Late Imperial Russia (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1986), pp. 297–298. On the general emergence of an Azerbaijani intelligentsia, also see Audrey Altstadt, “The Azerbaijani Bourgeoisie and the Cultural-Enlightenment Movement in Baku: First Steps toward Nationalism,” in Ronald Grigor Suny, ed., Transcaucasia, Nationalism and Social Change (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1983, 1996), pp. 199–209; Audrey Altstadt, The Azerbaijani Turks: Power and Identity under Russian Rule (Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, 1992), pp. 52–56; Tadeusz Swietochowski, Russian Azerbaijan, 1905–1920: the Shaping of National Identity in a Muslim Community (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1985), pp. 23–36; Tadeusz Swietochowski, Russia and Azerbaijan: A Borderland in Transition (New York: Columbia University Press, 1995), pp. 25–36. For a Persian alternative to the Turkic orientation, see François Georgeon, “Les Débuts d'un Intellectuel Azerbaïdjanais: Ahmed Aǧaoǧlu en France 1888–1894,” in Lemercier-Quelquejay, Veinstein and Wimbush, eds, Passé Turco-Tatar Présent Sovietique, pp. 373–387. On modernist debates in Central Asia, see Gulnar Kendirbaeva, “’We are children of Alash …‘: The Kazakh intelligentsia at the beginning of the twentieth century in search of national identity and prospects of the cultural survival of the Kazakh people,” Central Asian Survey, Vol. 18, No. 1, 1999, pp. 5–36; Adeeb Khalid, The Politics of Muslim Cultural Reform: Jadidism in Central Asia (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998).Google Scholar

5. Bennigsen et Lemercier-Quelquejay, La Presse et le Mouvement National chez les Musulmans de Russie avant 1920, pp. 22–23, 27–30. The regime issued an official publication such as Tiflisskie Vedomosti (1828–1833) in Russian, Georgian, and Azerbaijani Turkish. Also see Jeyhoun Bey Hajibeyli, “The Origins of the National Press in Azerbaijan,” The Asiatic Review, Vol. 26, No. 88, 1930, p. 760; A. Z. Abramishvili, “Iz istorii Azerbaidzhanskoi periodicheskoi pechati,” Uchenye zapiski Azerbaidzhanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. S.M. Kirova, No. 10, 1956, pp. 69–70; I. Enikolopov, “Pervaia tiurkskaia gazeta na Kavkaze,” Kul'tura i pis'mennost' Vostoka (Baku), No. 3, 1928, p. 140; Ts. P. Agaian, “Gazeta ‘Ekinchi’ i Armianskaia periodicheskaia pechat' 70-kh godov XIX veka,” Me'ruzeler (Doklady) (Baku), Vol. 2, No. 8, 1946, pp. 357–359; M. M. Kasumov, “G. Zardabi—vydaiushchiisia Azerbaidzhanskii prosvetitel' vtoroi poloviny XIX veka,” Trudy instituta istorii i filosofii (Baku), Vol. 8, 1955, pp. 141–142; Abbas Zamanov, “Grazhdanskii podvig,” Bakinskii Rabochii, No. 278, 1957, p. 2; Periodicheskaia pechat' na Kavkaze (Tiflis, 1901), p. 50; “Pervyia musul'manskiia gazety,” Mir Islama, Vol. 2, No. 12, 1914, p. 886. Gasprinskii later wrote of Zardabi's newspaper, “Although it had only a brief existence, the newspaper cast a ray of light, like a lightning bolt, upon [long] dormant ideas.” From Lazzerini, “Ǧadidism at the Turn of the Twentieth Century,” p. 252.Google Scholar

6. M. Kasumov, “Gasanbek Zardabi—pitomets Moskovskogo universiteta,” Uchenye zapiski AGU im. S.M. Kirova , No. 8, 1955, p. 58.Google Scholar

7. RGIA, f. 1405, op. 530, 1878–1886, d. 1076, Delo “Vedomosti del o litsakh, privlekavshikhsiia k otvetsvennosti za uchastie v revoliutsionnom dvizhenii,” ll. pp. 4–5.Google Scholar

8. Ibid., pp. 1. 8.Google Scholar

9. Bennigsen et Lemercier-Quelquejay, La Presse et le Mouvement National chez les Musulmans de Russie avant 1920, pp. 47–177; Altstadt, The Azerbaijani Turks, p. 52; Dilara M. Usmanova, “Die Tatarische Presse 1905–1918: Quellen, Entwicklungsetappen und Quantitative Analyse,” in Michael Kemper, Anke von Kügelgen and Dmitriy Yermakov, eds, Muslim Culture in Russia and Central Asia from the 18th to the Early 20th Centuries, Vol. 1 (Berlin: Klaus Schwarz Verlag, 1996), pp. 239–278; Khalid, The Politics of Muslim Cultural Reform.Google Scholar

10. Bennigsen et Lemercier-Quelquejay, La Presse et le Mouvement National chez les Musulmans de Russie avant 1920 , p. 133.Google Scholar

11. Gasprinskii, Russkoe Musul'manstvo , pp. 27–29. For a discussion of the distinction between “secular intellectuals” who addressed Russian society and reformers (in this case Central Asian Jadids) who addressed Muslim society, see Khalid, The Politics of Muslim Cultural Reform, pp. 103–106.Google Scholar

12. Bennigsen and Lemercier-Quelquejay, La Presse et le Mouvement National chez les Musulmans de Russie avant 1920, pp. 31–32; also see Dilyara M. Usmanova, “The Activity of the Muslim Faction of the State Duma and Its Significance in the Formation of a Political Culture among the Muslim Peoples of Russia (1906–1917),” in Anke von Kügelgen, Michael Kemper and Allen J. Frank, eds, Muslim Culture in Russia and Central Asia from the 18th to the Early 20th Centuries, Vol. 2 (Berlin: Klaus Schwarz Verlag, 1998), pp. 417–455.Google Scholar

13. “Baku, 4 Iiulia 1881 g.,” Kaspii, No. 30, 1881, p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14. “Ot redaktsii,” Kaspii, No. 1, 1881, pp. 1–2.Google Scholar

15. “Mestnyia izvestiia,” Kaspii, No. 41, 1881, p. 1.Google Scholar

16. “Vnutrennee obozrenie,” Kaspii, No. 46, 1881, pp. 2–3; “Mestnyia izvestiia,” Kaspii, No. 65, 1881, p. 2; “Sueverie musl'man,” Kaspii, No. 84, 1886, p. 3; “Mestnaia letopis',” Kaspii, No. 236, 1889, p. 1.Google Scholar

17. Zardabi, “Zardob, 13 ianvaria,” Kaspii, No. 16, 1885, and in Z. Geiushev, ed., Hasan-Bek Zardabi, Izbrannye stat'i i pis'ma (Baku, 1962), p. 90.Google Scholar

18. RGIA, f. 821, op. 8, 1878–79, d. 708, Delo “Otchet o posledstviiakh proizvedennoi zakavkazskim Sheikh Ul Islamom v 1888 i 1889 godakh,” 1. 78.Google Scholar

19. Zardabi, “Sel. Zardob, 25 maia,” Kaspii, No. 124, 1885, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, p. 101.Google Scholar

20. Zardabi, Kaspii, No. 21, 1885, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, p. 92.Google Scholar

21. Ibid.Google Scholar

22. Zardabi, “Zardob, Geokchaiskogo uezda,” Kaspii, No. 130, 1883, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, p. 58.Google Scholar

23. Zardabi, “Iz Zardoba,” Kaspii, No. 86, 1881, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, p. 35.Google Scholar

24. Zardabi, “Byt' li shkola v Zardobe?” Kaspii, No. 42, 1883, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, p. 49.Google Scholar

25. Zardabi, “Iz Zardoba,” Kaspii, No. 86, 1881, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, p. 36.Google Scholar

26. Zardabi, “Byt' li shkola v Zardobe?” p. 49.Google Scholar

27. Zardabi, “Zardob, Geokchaiskogo uezda,” Kaspii, No. 86, 1883, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, p. 52.Google Scholar

28. RGIA, f. 821, op. 8, 1878–79, d. 708, 1. 78; f. 821, op. 8, 1888, d. 707, 1. 214; f. 821, op. 8, d. 610, 1. 261.Google Scholar

29. Zardabi, “Byt' li shkola v Zardobe?” p. 47.Google Scholar

30. Ibid., p. 49.Google Scholar

31. Ibid., p. 50.Google Scholar

32. Ibid.Google Scholar

33. Zardabi, “Zardob, Geokchaiskogo uezda,” Kaspii, No. 86, 1883, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, p. 52.Google Scholar

34. Zardabi, “Zardob, Geokchaiskogo uezda,” Kaspii, No. 122, 1883, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, p. 56.Google Scholar

35. Zardabi, Kaspii, No. 123, 1885, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, p. 101.Google Scholar

36. Zardabi, “Zakholystnaia kartinka,” Kaspii, No. 123, 1885, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, p. 107.Google Scholar

37. Zardabi, “Sel. Zardob,” Kaspii, No. 24, 1883, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, p. 47.Google Scholar

38. Ibid., p. 46.Google Scholar

39. Zardabi, “Zardob, 25 April,” Kaspii, No. 50, 1882, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, p. 37.Google Scholar

40. Zardabi, “Zardob, Geokchaiskogo uezda,” Kaspii, No. 68, 1883, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, p. 51.Google Scholar

41. Zardabi, “Zardob, 16 Avgusta,” Kaspii, No. 9, 1882, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, p. 42.Google Scholar

42. Zardabi, “Zardob, Geokchaiskogo uezda,” Kaspii, No. 68, 1883, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, p. 51.Google Scholar

43. Zardabi, “Zardob, 15 oktiabria,” Kaspii, No. 232, 1885, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, p. 114.Google Scholar

44. Zardabi, “Zardob,” Kaspii, No. 121, 1883, p. 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

45. Ibid., p. 55.Google Scholar

46. Zardabi, “Kartinka zakholustnykh nravov,” Kaspii, No. 262, 1885, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, pp. 120–121.Google Scholar

47. Zardabi, “Eshche o otstalosti vostochnogo zakavkaz'ia,” Kaspii, Nos 213, 223, 1899; Nos. 86, 94, 101, 122, 140, 1900; and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, p. 349; emphasis added.Google Scholar

48. Zardabi, “Zardob, Geokchaiskogo uezda,” Kaspii, No. 214, 1886, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, p. 126; “Nashi kochevniki,” Kaspii, No. 152, 1899, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, p. 207.Google Scholar

49. Zardabi, “Nashi kochevniki,” in Geiushev, Izbrannye, p. 208.Google Scholar

50. Zardabi, “Iz zhizni kochevnikov,” Kaspii, No. 252, 1900, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, pp. 343–45.Google Scholar

51. Zardabi, “Nashi kochevniki,” p. 207.Google Scholar

52. Zardabi, “Parokhodstvo na r. Kure,” Kaspii, No. 212, 1899, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, p. 236.Google Scholar

53. Zardabi, “Eshche o otstalosti vostochnogo zakavkaz'ia,” p. 354.Google Scholar

54. Zardabi, “Ob otstalosti vostochnogo zakavkaz'ia,” Kaspii, No. 213, 1899, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, p. 346.Google Scholar

55. Zardabi, “Nuzhda v vode v vostochnom zakavkaz'e,” Kaspii, Nos 114, 116, 1899, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, p. 202.Google Scholar

56. Zardabi, “Po povodu vodvereniia pereselentsev na mugani,” Kaspii, No. 276, 1899, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, p. 260.Google Scholar

57. Zardabi, “Nuzhda v vode v vostochnom zakavkaz'e,” pp. 199–202.Google Scholar

58. Zardabi, “Oblesenie stepei Zakavkaz'ia,” Kaspii, No. 172, 1899, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, p. 215.Google Scholar

59. Zardabi, “Rybnye promysla vostochnogo zakavkaz'ia,” Kaspii, No. 242, 1899, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, pp. 243–44. The income from fines was not only from the Kura.Google Scholar

60. Zardabi, “Zardob, 16 Iunia,” Kaspii, No. 134, 1886, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, p. 125.Google Scholar

61. Zardabi, “Zardob,” Kaspii, No. 208, 1889, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, p. 157.Google Scholar

62. Zardabi, “Iz Zardoba,” Kaspii, No. 195, 1899, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, p. 230.Google Scholar

63. Zardabi, “O torgakh na rybolovnykh vodakh vostochnogo zakavkaz'ia,” Kaspii, No. 84, 1900, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, p. 306.Google Scholar

64. A sazhen is approximately 84 inches.Google Scholar

65. Zardabi, “K voprosu o sudokhodstve po Kure,” Kaspii, No. 226, 1886, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, p. 128.Google Scholar

66. Markov, Evgenii, Ocherki Kavkaza (St Petersburg and Moscow, 1887), p. 143. The first steamship to travel the Kura was the Prince Vorontsov in 1853. See M. Korganov, “Istoricheskii ocherk parokhodstva na reke Kure,” in N. Zeidlits, ed., Sbornik Svedenii o Kavkaze, Vol. 2 (Tiflis, 1872), pp. 68–72.Google Scholar

67. Zardabi, “Iz Zardoba,” Kaspii, No. 258, 1892, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, p. 174.Google Scholar

68. Zardabi, “Zardob, 6-go maia,” Kaspii, No. 98, 1892, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, p. 171.Google Scholar

69. Zardabi, “Kustarnoe shelkotkatskoe proizvodstvo v gor. shemakhe i ego uezda,” Kaspii, No. 132, 1902, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, p. 406.Google Scholar

70. Zardabi, “Iz Zardoba,” Novoe Obozrenie , No. 2821, 1892, and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, pp. 175–176.Google Scholar

71. Zardabi, “Blagodeteli' derevni,” Kaspii, Nos 270, 273, 277, 1899; No. 18, 1900; and in Geiushev, Izbrannye, pp. 272–273.Google Scholar

72. Geiushev, ed., “Hasan-Bek Melikov-Zardabi,” p. 25.Google Scholar

73. Said, Edward, Orientalism (New York: Vintage, 1978).Google Scholar

74. “Nashi sel'skie shkoly,” Kaspii, No. 176, 1899, and in Geiushev, ed., Izbrannye, p. 220.Google Scholar

75. Altstadt-Mirhadi, “The Forgotten Factor,” pp. 362–363; Altstadt, The Azerbaijani Turks , pp. 55–56.Google Scholar