Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T06:55:38.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Representing the Empire: The Meaning of Siberia for Russian Imperial Identity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Claudia Weiss
Claudia Weiss*
Affiliation:
Helmut-Schmidt-Universität der Bundeswehr, Hamburg, Germany. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Would you like to travel to outer space? Explore like real astronauts the slow, gentle movements characteristic of a weightless environment? The Houston Space Center offers its visitors such a trip through the ISS, the International Space Station. It presents America's space programme by using a simulator to create a compelling environment, complete with 3,000 accurately placed stars that mimic what the real astronauts experience in the ISS.1 You can feel the glory of current-day American scientific progress, the power of the US, the world's number one power.

Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 35 , Issue 3: Identities, Nations and Politics after Communism , July 2007 , pp. 439 - 456
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aimone, Linda, and Olmo, Carlo. Les Expositions universelles: 1851–1900. Paris: Belin, 1993.Google Scholar
Archiv Russkogo Geograficheskogo Obshchestva (ARGO), 1–1892. op. 1, n° 12, 1892. Polozhenie o Russkom otdele na Vsemirnoi Vystavke 1893 g. v Chikago.Google Scholar
Archiv Russkoi Akademii Nauk (ARAN), fond 906, op. 1 n° 12, 1. 98.Google Scholar
Archives nationals de France (ANF). F12 4264, 4265.Google Scholar
Aubain, Laurence. “La Russie à l'exposition universelle de 1889.” Cahiers du Monde russe 37, no. 3 (1996): 349–68.Google Scholar
Bassin, Mark. “Russia between Europe and Asia. The Ideological Construction of Geographical Space.” Slavic Review 50, no. 1 (1991): 1–17.Google Scholar
Bassin, Mark. Imperial Visions: Nationalist Imagination and Geographical Expansion in the Russian Far East, 1840–1865. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Bassin, Mark. “Imperialer Raum/Nationaler Raum. Sibirien auf der kognitiven Landkarte Russlands im 19. Jahrhundert.” Geschichte und Gesellschaft 28 (2002): 378–403.Google Scholar
Benedict, Burton. “International Exhibitions and National Identity.” Anthropology Today 7, no. 3 (1991): 5–9.Google Scholar
Commission impériale de Russie à l'Exposition Universelle de 1900, Catalogue général de la Section russe. Paris: Imprimeries Lemercier, 1900.Google Scholar
Diment, Galya, and Slezkine, Yuri, eda. Between Heaven and Hell: The Myth of Siberia in Russian Culture. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Donelly, Alton S. “Peter the Great and Siberia: Russian Commercial Activities in Siberia during the Reign of Peter the Great.” In Sibérie II. Questions sibériennes. Histoires, cultures, litterature, edited by Chichlo, Boris. Paris: Institut d'études slave, 1999.Google Scholar
Fisher, David C. “Westliche Hegemonie und russische Ambivalenz. Das Zarenreich auf der Centennial Exposition in Philadelphia 1876.” In Weltausstellungen im 19. Jahrhundert, edited by Fuchs, Eckardt. Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag, 2000.Google Scholar
Fisher, Raymond. The Russian Fur Trade: 1150–1700. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1943.Google Scholar
Fryer, Paul. “Heaven, Hell, Or … Something in Between? Contrasting Russian Images of Siberia.” In Beyond the Limits: The Concept of Space in Russian History and Culture, edited by Smith, Jeremy. Helsinki: Suomen Historiallinen Seura (SHS), 1999.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Eckardt, ed. Weltausstellungen im 19. Jahrhundert. Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag, 2000.Google Scholar
Geyer, Dietrich. Der russische Imperialismus. Studien über den Zusammenhang von innerer und auswärtiger Politik 1860–1914. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1977.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, Paul. Ephemeral Vistas: The Expositions universelles, Great Exhibitions and World's Fairs, 1851–1939. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Gubkin, O. P. “Istoki ornamentiki Kaslinskogo chugunnogo pavil'ona.” In Kaslinskii chugunnyi pavi'on. Materialy nauchnoi konferencii posiashchennoi 100-letiiu Kaslinskogo chugunnogo pavil'ona 27 aprelia 2000. Ekaterinburg: isdatel'stvo Uralskogo universiteta, 2001.Google Scholar
Hellberg-Hirn, Elena. Soil and Soul: The Symbolic World of Russianness. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1997.Google Scholar
Hellberg-Hirn, Elena. “Ambivalent Space. Expressions of Russian Identity.” In Beyond the Limits: The Concept of Space in Russian History and Culture, edited by Smith, Jeremy. Helsinki: Suomen Historiallinen Seura (SHS), 1999.Google Scholar
Kovalevskii, V. I., ed. Rossiia v konce XIX veka. St. Petersburg: Brockhaus-Efron, 1900.Google Scholar
Krahmer, G. Sibirien und die groβe sibirische Eisenbahn. Leipzig: von Zuckschwerdt, 1897.Google Scholar
Kretschmer, Winfried. Geschichte der Weltausstellungen. Frankfurt and New York: Campus, 1999.Google Scholar
Kriazheva, N. G. “Elementy stilia ‘modern’ v dekore Kaslinskogo pavil'ona.” In Kaslinskii chugunnyi pavil'on. Materialy nauchnoi konferencii posiashchennoi 100-letiiu Kaslinskogo chugunnogo pavil'ona 27 aprelia 2000. Ekaterinburg: isdatel'stvo Uralskogo universiteta, 2001.Google Scholar
Leslie, Frank. Frank Leslie's Illustrated Historical Register of the Centennial Exposition, 1876, 1877. Reprinted New York: Paddington Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Lieven, Dominic. “The Russian Empire and the Soviet Union as Imperial Polities.” Journal of Contemporary History 30 (1995): 607–36.Google Scholar
Lieven, Dominic. “Dilemmas of Empire 1850–1918: Power, Territory, Identity.” Journal of Contemporary History 34, no. 2 (1999): 163–200.Google Scholar
Lieven, Dominic. Empire: The Russian Empire and its Rivals. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Lincoln, W. Bruce. Die Eroberung Sibiriens. Munich and Zurich: Piper, 1994.Google Scholar
Link, Jürgen, and Wülfing, Wulf, eda. Nationale Mythen und Symbole in der zweiten Hälfte des 19. Jahrhunderts. Strukturen und Funktionen von Konzepten nationaler Identität. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1991.Google Scholar
Motyl, Alexander J. Imperial Ends: The Decay, Collapse, and Revival of Empires. New York: Columbia University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Münkler, Herfried. Imperien: Die Logik der Weltherrschaft—vom Alten Rom bis zu den Vereinigten Staaten. Berlin: Rowohlt, 2005.Google Scholar
Nansens, Fridtjof. Sibirien—ein Zukunftsland. Leipzig: Brockhaus, 1914.Google Scholar
O'Connell, Lauren M. “A Rational, National Architecture: Viollet-le-Duc's Modest Proposal for Russia.” JSAH (Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians) 52 (1993): 436–52.Google Scholar
O'Connell, Lauren M. “Constructing the Russian Other. Viollet-le-Duc and the Politics of an Asiatic Past.” In Architectures of Russian Identity: 1500 to the Present, edited by Cracraft, James and Rowland, Daniel. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Orlov, M. A. Vsemirnaia Parizhskaia vystavka 1900 goda v illiustratsiakh i opisaniakh. St. Petersburg, 1900.Google Scholar
Ory, Pascal. Les Expositions universelles de Paris. Paris: Editions Ramsay. Otchet IRGO za 1851. (1982). pp. 6–7.Google Scholar
Peshchurov, A. “Peschtschuroff's Aufnahme des Amur-Stromes in Jahre 1855 und die russischchinesische Grenze im Amurlande von 1689 bis 1856, von A. Petermann.” Petermanns Mitteilungen 2 (1856): 472–79.Google Scholar
Peshkova, I. M. “Parizh—Ekaterinburg. God 1900-i.” In Kaslinskii chugunnyi pavil'on. Materially nauchnoi konferencii posiashchennoi 100-letiiu Kaslinskogo chugunnogo pavil'ona 27 aprelia 2000. Ekaterinburg: isdatel'stvo Uralskogo universiteta, 2001.Google Scholar
Poulsen, John. Die Transsibirische Eisenbahn. Die längste Eisenbahn der Welt. Malmö: Stenvall, 1986.Google Scholar
Rembold, Elfie. “Exhibitions and National Identity.” National Identities 1, no. 3 (2000): 221–25.Google Scholar
Remnev, Anatolii V. “Uchastie komiteta sibirskoi zheleznoi dorogi vo vsemirnoi vystavke 1900 goda v Parizhe.” In Khozjastvennoe osvoenie Sibiri. Istoriia, istoriografiia, istochniki. Vol. 1. Tomsk: isdatel'stvo Tomskogo universiteta, 1991.Google Scholar
Riasanovsky, Nicholas V. “Asia through Russian Eyes.” In Russia and Asia: Essays on the Influence of Russia on the Asian Peoples, edited by Vucinich, Wayne S. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Rossiia na vsemirnoi vystavke v Parizhe v 1900 godu. Chap. 2. St. Petersburg, 1900.Google Scholar
Ruge, P. Sophus. Die Transsibirische Eisenbahn. Dresden: Zahn & Jaensch, 1901.Google Scholar
Salmond, Wendy R. Arts and Crafts in Late Imperial Russia: Reviving the Kustar Art Industries, 1870–1917. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Saul, N. E. Concord and Conflict: The United States and Russia, 1867–1914. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1996.Google Scholar
Schriefers, Thomas. Für den Abriss gebaut? Anmerkungen zur Geschichte der Weltausstellungen. Hagen: Ardenkuverlag, 1999.Google Scholar
Semenov, P. P., ed. Okrainy Rossii. Sibir, Turkestan, Kavkaz i poliania chast’ Evropeiskoi Rossii. St. Petersburg: Brockhaus-Efron, 1900.Google Scholar
Siberia and the Great Siberian Railway (The Industries of Russia, vol. 5). Edited and translated by John M. Crawford. St. Petersburg, 1893.Google Scholar
Smith, Walter. The Masterpieces of the Centennial International Exhibition, Philadelphia. Vol. 2, Industrial Art. Philadelphia: Gebbie & Berrie, 1876.Google Scholar
Sokolov, A. S. “Rossiia na vsemirnoi vystavke v Chikago v 1893 g.” Amerikanskii ezhegodnik (1984): 152–64.Google Scholar
Stökl, Günther. Russische Geschichte. Von den Anfängen bis zur Gegenwart. Stuttgart: Alfred Kröner, 1983.Google Scholar
Tolz, Vera. Russia. London and New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Vladimirov, M. M. Russkii sredi Amerikantsev. Moi lichnye vpechatlenie kak tokaria chernorabochnogo, plotnika I puteshestvennika. St. Petersburg, 1877.Google Scholar
von Herberstein, Sigmund. Das alte Russland. In Anlehnung an die älteste deutsche Ausgabe aus dem Lateinischen übertragen von Wolfram von den Steinen. Mit einem Nachwort von Walter Leitsch. Zürich: Manesse, 1985.Google Scholar
von Plessen, Marie-Louise, ed. “Der gebannte Augenblick. Die Abbildung von Realität im Panorama des 19. Jahrhunderts.” In Sehsucht. Das Panorama als Massenunterhaltung des 19., Jahrhunderts. Basel: Stroemfeld/Roter Stern, 1993.Google Scholar
Wegweiser der Groβen Sibirischen Eisenbahn. Herausgegeben vom Ministerium der Wegekommmunikationen und Redaktion von A. I. Dmitriiew-Mamonov, Berlin, 1901.Google Scholar
Weiss, Claudia. “Nash: Appropriating Siberia for the Russian Empire.” Sibirica: Interdisciplinary Journal of Siberian Studies 5, no. 1 (2006): 141–55.Google Scholar
Weiss, Claudia. Wie Sibirien “unser” wurde. Die Russische Geographische Gesellschaft und ihr Einfluss auf die Bilder und Vorstellungen von Sibirien im 19. Jahrhundert. Göttingen: V&R Unipress, 2007.Google Scholar
Wilson, Michael. “Consuming History: The Nation, the Past, and the Commodity at 1'-Exposition Universelle de 1900.” American Journal of Semiotics 8, no. 4 (1991): 131–53.Google Scholar
Wortman, Richard. “The ‘Russian Style’ in Church Architecture as Imperial Symbol after 1881.” In Architectures of Russian Identity: 1500 to the Present, edited by Cracraft, James and Rowland, Daniel. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Zamoyski, Adam. 1812: Napoleon's Fatal March to Moscow. London: Harper Perennial, 2004.Google Scholar