Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T06:48:56.545Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Reemergence of Slovakia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Sabrina Petra Ramet
Sabrina Petra Ramet*
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There are no differences between the Czech and Slovak governments’ views on the forms of the future coexistence and relations between the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic. Our positions are literally identical.

Vladimir Meciar, Prime Minister of the Slovak Republic (August 1990)

Since our democratic revolution, the situation [in relations between the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic] has never been as serious and precipitous as it is today.

Vaclav Havel, President of the Czech and Slovak Federative Republic (September 1991)

On 9 June 1992 came the shattering announcement by newly elected Czech Republic Prime Minister Vaclav Klaus, that the Czechoslovak federation was no more. An interim (but trimmed) federal government was to be set up to preside over the hasty dismantlement of the 74-year old state. By 30 September, the Czechoslovak Republic was to be completely split in two. And by January 1993, the finances of state are supposed to be completely divided.

Type
I Eastern Europe Reconsidered
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 22 , Issue 1: Special Issue - Ethnopolitics in Poland , Spring 1994 , pp. 99 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 Association for the Study of Nationalities of Eastern Europe and ex-USSR 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Note

1. In interview with Rude pravo (Prague), 16 August 1990, pp. 1, 5, trans. in Foreign Broadcast Information Service (FBIS), Daily Report (Eastern Europe; hereafter EE), 23 August 1991, p. 9.Google Scholar

2. Quoted in Daily Telegraph (London), 25 September 1991, p. 12.Google Scholar

3. La Stampa (Torino), 10 June 1992, p. 7; and Welt am Sonntag (Bonn), 21 June 1992, p. 2.Google Scholar

4. Prague CSTK (26 June 1992), in FBIS, Daily Report (Eastern Europe), 30 June 1992, p. 13. The poll was taken by the Prague-based Institute for Public Opinion Research. A similar poll conducted in April by Bratislava's Center for Social Analysis reached similar results, showing only 17 percent of Slovaks favoring outright independence—as reported in New York Times (22 June 1992), p. A3.Google Scholar

5. Mlada Fronta Dnes (Prague), 29 June 1991, pp. 1, 2, trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (Eastern Europe), 3 July 1991, p. 11.Google Scholar

6. Among the best works on the history of Czechs and Slovaks 1918–89 are: John Wright Daschke, Nationalism, Communism and Federalism: The Politics of Ethnic Development in Czechoslovakia, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation (Indiana University, 1985); Carol Skalnik Leff, National Conflict in Czechoslovakia: The Making and Remaking of a State, 1918–1987 (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1988); Eugen Steiner, The Slovak Dilemma (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973); and Sharon L. Wolchik, Czechoslovakia in Transition: Politics, Economics and Society (London: Pinter Publishers, 1991).Google Scholar

7. There are, by contrast, only 23,000 Hungarians living in the Czech lands, according to official statistics—Magyar Hirlap (Budapest), 17 October 1990, p. 2, trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 23 October 1990, p. 20.Google Scholar

8. Edith Oltay, “Hungarian Minority in Slovakia Sets up Independent Organizations”, in RFE, Report on Eastern Europe (16 March 1990), pp. 18–20.Google Scholar

9. Prague CTK (30 May 1991), in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 3 June 1991, p. 15.Google Scholar

10. Obcansky Denik (Prague), 19 August 1991, p. 7, trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 26 August 1991, p. 14.Google Scholar

11. Daily Telegraph (2 March 1991), p. 10.Google Scholar

12. Frankfurter Allgemeine (30 June 1990), p. 5.Google Scholar

13. Edith Oltay, “Hungarians in Slovakia Organize to Press for Ethnic Rights”, in RFE, Report on Eastern Europe (1 June 1990), p. 23.Google Scholar

14. This is also the view of Narodna obroda (Bratislava), 24 July 1991, p. 3, trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 1 August 1991, p. 13.Google Scholar

15. Peter Martin, “The Hyphen Controversy”, in RFE, Report on Eastern Europe (20 April 1990), p. 14.Google Scholar

16. New York Times (21 April 1990), p. 4.Google Scholar

17. Bratislava Domestic Service (20 November 1990), trans. in FBIS, i (EE), 21 November 1990, p. 21.Google Scholar

18. Ibid., p. 22.Google Scholar

19. Jan Obrman, “The Issue of Autonomy for Moravia and Silesia”, in RFE, Report on Eastern Europe (12 April 1991), p. 17.Google Scholar

20. Bratislava Domestic Service (20 November 1990) [as per note 15], p. 22.Google Scholar

21. Prague CTK (12 September 1990), in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 19 September 1990, p. 37.Google Scholar

22. Prague CTK (18 June 1991), in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 20 June 1991, p. 20.Google Scholar

23. Prague CTK (16 July 1991), in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 19 July 1991, pp. 12–13.Google Scholar

24. Prague CTK (10 August 1990), in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 13 August 1990, p. 20.Google Scholar

25. Prague CTK (27 August 1990), in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 29 August 1990, p. 25; also Bratislava Domestic Service (26 August 1990), trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 28 August 1990, p. 22.Google Scholar

26. Prague CTK (3 April 1991), in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 5 April 1991, p. 14; also Prague CTK (13 March 1991), in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 14 March 1991, p. 15.Google Scholar

27. Quoted in Prague CTK (19 August 1990), in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 20 August 1990, p. 18.Google Scholar

28. See Vjesnik (Zagreb), 28 October 1990, p. 24; and Lidove noviny (Prague), 14 November 1990, p. 3, trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 20 November 1990, p. 24.Google Scholar

29. Narodna obroda (12 November 1990), p. 2, trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 16 November 1990, p. 21.Google Scholar

30. Prague CTK (26 November 1990), in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 29 November 1990, p. 21.Google Scholar

31. Prague CTK (14 November 1990), in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 19 November 1990, p. 33.Google Scholar

32. Prague CTK (8 August 1991), in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 9 August 1991, p. 14.Google Scholar

33. Prague CTK (21 March 1991), in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 25 March 1991, p. 22; Pravda (Bratislava), 23 March 1991, p. 3, trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 27 March 1991, p. 18; Der Spiegel (Hamburg), 15 April 1991, pp. 200, 202; and Hospodarske noviny (Prague), 12 June 1991, p. 3, trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (EEE), 14 June 1991, p. 16.Google Scholar

34. Narodna obroda (3 January 1991), p. 3, trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 9 January 1991, p. 13; and Hospodarske noviny (21 January 1991), p. 5.Google Scholar

35. Budapest MTI (17 September 1990), in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 19 September 1990, p. 38.Google Scholar

36. Pravda (29 January 1991), p. 2, trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 5 February 1991, p. 23.Google Scholar

37. Süddeutsche Zeitung (Munich), 27/28 October 1990, p. 2.Google Scholar

38. Lidove noviny (8 November 1990), p. 2, trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 16 November 1990, p. 23.Google Scholar

39. Quoted in Mlada Fronta Dnes (27 August 1990), pp. 1–2, excerpted in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 5 September 1990, p. 21.Google Scholar

40. Prague CTK (30 July 1991), in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 31 July 1991, p. 18.Google Scholar

41. Rude pravo (15 June 1991), pp. 1, 5, trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 20 June 1991, p. 19.Google Scholar

42. Quoted in Prague CTK (14 November 1990), in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 14 November 1990, p. 19.Google Scholar

43. Financial Times (15 November 1990), p. 2.Google Scholar

44. Prague CTK (14 November 1990), in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 14 November 1990, p. 20.Google Scholar

45. Quoted in Frankfurter Allgemeine (11 December 1990), p. 8.Google Scholar

46. From the full text, as published in Smena (Bratislava), 2 March 1991, p. 4, trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 13 March 1991, p. 17.Google Scholar

47. From the complete text, as carried by Prague Domestic Service (14 March 1991), trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 15 March 1991, p. 17.Google Scholar

48. Prague CTK (18 March 1991), in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 22 March 1991, p. 14.Google Scholar

49. Süddeutsche Zeitung (16/17 March 1991), p. 7; also Jiri Pehe, “Growing Slovak Demands Seen as Threat to Federation”, in RFE, Report on Eastern Europe (22 March 1991), pp. 8–9.Google Scholar

50. Prague Television Service in Slovak (14 August 1990), trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 16 August 1990, p. 11.Google Scholar

51. Prague CTK (5 October 1990), in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 10 October 1990, p. 24.Google Scholar

52. The complete text of the law was published in Narodna obroda (27 October 1990), p. 2, trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 30 October 1990, pp. 14–15.Google Scholar

53. Prague Domestic Service (25 October 1990), trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 26 October 1990, p. 20.Google Scholar

54. Lidove noviny (6 November 1990), p. 2, trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 9 November 1990, p. 11; and Lidove noviny (10 November 1990), p. 3, trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 15 November 1990, p. 29.Google Scholar

55. See Verejnost (Bratislava), 31 October 1990, p. 3, trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 16 November 1990, pp. 24–25.Google Scholar

56. Mlada Fronta Dnes (28 February 1991), p. 2, trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 5 March 1991, p. 26.Google Scholar

57. Neue Zürcher Zeitung (8 March 1991), p. 2.Google Scholar

58. See, for example, Zemedelske noviny (Prague), 15 March 1991, pp. 1, 4, trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 21 March 1991, p. 15; and Narodna obroda (15 March 1991), p. 13, trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 22 March 1991, p. 13.Google Scholar

59. Prague CTK (25 March 1991), in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 26 March 1991, pp. 28–29.Google Scholar

60. Verejnost (14 March 1991), p. 3, trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 19 March 1991, pp. 22–23.Google Scholar

61. Vancouver Sun (25 March 1991), p. A5.Google Scholar

62. Prague Domestic Service (24 April 1991), trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 25 April 1991, p. 13.Google Scholar

63. Prague CTK (8 August 1991), in FBIS, Daily Report (9 August 1991), p. 14.Google Scholar

64. Rude pravo (27 July 1991), p. 2, trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 5 August 1991, p. 19.Google Scholar

65. Prague CTK (14 August 1991), in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 20 August 1991, p. 18; Prague CTK (15 August 1991), in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 16 August 1991, p. 9; and Smena (15 August 1991), pp. 1–2, trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 19 August 1991, p. 11.Google Scholar

66. A poll taken in early May 1991 found that 82 percent of Slovaks opposed the recall of Meciar from the prime ministership and the appointment of Carnogursky to that post. See Prague CTK (30 May 1991), in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 3 June 1991, p. 15.Google Scholar

67. Slovensky Dennik (Bratislava), 13 May 1991, pp. 1, 2, trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 15 May 1991, p. 10.Google Scholar

68. Interview with Liberation, reprinted in Lidove noviny (24 July 1991), pp. 1–2, trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 29 July 1991, p. 12.Google Scholar

69. Excerpt from an article by V. Meciar for Za Demokraticke Slovensko, no. 14, reprinted in Narodna obroda (13 September 1991), p. 13, trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 19 September 1991, p. 16.Google Scholar

70. Ibid.; see also Nove Slovo, no. 20, reprinted in Narodna obroda (10 July 1991), p. 13, trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 12 July 1991, p. 11.Google Scholar

71. Lidove noviny (16 July 1991), p. 1, summarized in FBIS, Daily Report (EE), 22 July 1991, p. 11.Google Scholar

72. Neue Zürcher Zeitung (15 November 1991), p. 1.Google Scholar

73. Ibid., (1 November 1991), p. 4.Google Scholar

74. Ibid., (25 October 1991), p. 2.Google Scholar

75. Ibid., (8 November 1991), p. 2, and (20 November 1991), p. 3.Google Scholar

76. The Times (London), 16 September 1991, p. 24.Google Scholar

77. Financial Times (15 November 1991), p. 3.Google Scholar

78. Neue Zürcher Zeitung (30 November 1991), p. 3.Google Scholar

79. Ibid., (24 January 1992), p. 3.Google Scholar

80. Hospodarske Noviny (11 February 1992), p. 4, trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (Eastern Europe), 14 February 1992, p. 7.Google Scholar

81. Prague CSTK (14 February 1992) and Prague CSTK (18 February 1992)—both trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (Eastern Europe), 19 February 1992, p. 3; and Neue Zürcher Zeitung (21 February 1992), p. 4.Google Scholar

82. Verejnost (31 January 1992), p. 2, trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (Eastern Europe), 6 February 1992, p. 5.Google Scholar

83. Financial Times (9 June 1992), p. 2.Google Scholar

84. Wall Street Journal (22 June 1992), p. A9.Google Scholar

85. Financial Times (9 June 1992), p. 2.Google Scholar

86. Salzburger Nachrichten (12 June 1992), p. 4.Google Scholar

87. Financial Times (11 June 1992), p. 3; and New York Times (25 June 1992), p. A7.Google Scholar

88. Prague CSTK (8 June 1992), in FBIS, Daily Report (Eastern Europe), 9 June 1992, p. 14.Google Scholar

89. Financial Times (17 June 1992), p. 2.Google Scholar

90. Die Presse (Vienna), 13 June 1992, p. 2, and 16 June 1992, p. 3; and Die Furche (Vienna), 18 June 1992, p. 1.Google Scholar

91. Rozhlasova Stanica Slovensko Network (Bratislava), 19 June 1992, trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (Eastern Europe), 22 June 1992, pp. 12–17.Google Scholar

92. Frankfurter Allgemeine (10 June 1992), p. 15.Google Scholar

93. Die Welt (Bonn), 18 June 1992, p. 6.Google Scholar

94. Wall Street Journal (26 June 1992), p. A14.Google Scholar

95. Kurier (Vienna), 18 June 1992, p. 3.Google Scholar

96. Financial Times (30 June 1992), p. 3.Google Scholar

97. Stanice Ceskoslovensko Radio (Prague), 3 July 1992, trans. in FBIS, Daily Report (Eastern Europe), 7 July 1992, p. 18.Google Scholar

98. See, for example, Cynthia H. Enloe, Ethnic Conflict and Political Development (Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1973); and Saul Newman, “Does Modernization Breed Ethnic Political Conflict?” in World Politics, Vol. 43, No. 3 (April 1991).Google Scholar

99. E. K. Francis, Interethnic Relations: An Essay in Sociological Theory (New York: Elsevier Publishing Co., 1976), p. 404.Google Scholar

100. Ibid.Google Scholar

101. Ted Robert Gurr, Why Men Rebel (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1970), p. 360.Google Scholar

102. A point made earlier by Alvin Rabushka and Kenneth Shepsle in their book: Politics in Plural Societies: A Theory of Democratic Instability (Columbus, Ohio: Merrill, 1972).Google Scholar

103. Ibid., p. 360.Google Scholar

104. Ibid., p. 363.Google Scholar

105. Closely paraphrased from Hugh Seton-Watson, Nations and States: An Enquiry into the Origins of Nations and the Politics of Nationalism (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1977), p. 471.Google Scholar

106. Quoted in New York Times (26 January 1992), p. 8.Google Scholar