Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T18:13:29.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

National Identities and Virtual Foreign Policies among the Eastern Slavs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Taras Kuzio
Taras Kuzio*
Affiliation:
The University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The three eastern Slavic states—Russia, Ukraine and Belarus—have virtual foreign policies towards each other that are a product of weakly defined national identities inherited from the former USSR. In addition, this virtuality has been compounded by the presence of centrist, former high-ranking nomenklatura elites who have led all three countries at different times since 1992. Former “sovereign communist” centrist oligarchs are ideologically amorphous, in both the domestic and foreign policy arenas.

Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , December 2003 , pp. 431 - 452
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. See Taras Kuzio and Marc Nordberg, “Nation and State Building, Historical Legacies and National Identities in Belarus and Ukraine: A Comparative Analysis,” Canadian Review of Studies in Nationalism, Vol. 26, Nos 1–2, 1999, pp. 69–90, and T. Kuzio, “History, Memory and Nation Building in the Post-Soviet Colonial Space,” Nationalities Papers, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2002, pp. 241–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. See Taras Hunczak, ed., The Ukraine, 1917–1921: A Study in Revolution (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute, 1977) and P. P. Tolochko, V. A. Smoliy, V. F. Verstiuk, Yu. M. Hamretsky, B. V. Ivanenko, Yu. Yu. Kondufor, S. V. Kulchytsky, YE. P. Shatalina, O. I. Shus and L. V. Yakovleyeva, eds, Ukraiinska Tsentralna Rada. Dokumenty I Materialy, Vols 1 and 2 (Kyiv: Naukova Dumka, 1996 and 1997).Google Scholar

3. See Yitzhak M. Brudny, Reinventing Russia. Russian Nationalism and the Soviet State, 1953–1991 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998), Vera Tolz, Inventing the Nation. Russia (London: Arnold, 2001), Stephen Eke and T. Kuzio, “Sultanism in Eastern Europe. The Socio-political Roots of Authoritarian Populism in Belarus,” Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 52, No. 3, 2000, pp. 523–547, and Taras Kuzio, “Ukraine: Coming to Terms with the Soviet Legacy,” Journal of Communist Studies & Transition Politics, Vol. 14, No. 4, 1998, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar

4. See Stephen Shulman, “The Cultural Foundations of Ukrainian National Identity,” Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 22, No. 6, 1999, pp. 1011–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5. David G. Rowley, “Imperial versus national discourse: the case of Russia,” Nations and Nationalism, Vol.6, Part 1 (January 2000), pp. 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6. Vera Tölz, “Rethinking Russian-Ukrainian Relations: A New Trend in Nation-Building in Postcommunist Russia,” Nations and Nationalism, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2002, pp. 235–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. Mark Beissinger, “Elites and Ethnic Identity in Soviet and Post-Soviet Policies,” in Alexander J. Motyl, ed., Post-Soviet Nations. Perspectives on the Demise of the USSR (New York: Columbia University Press, 1992), p. 150.Google Scholar

8. Dominique Arel points out that the real pro-European forces in Ukraine are nationalists and national democrats: “In an intriguing way, democratization, economic reforms, and national identity in Ukraine are symbiotically linked.” See his “Kuchmagate and the Demise of Ukraine's Geopolitical Bluff,” East European Constitutional Review, Vol. 10, Nos 2–3, 2001, p. 59. See also Taras Kuzio, “Nationalism and Reform in Belarus and Ukraine,” RFERL Poland, Belarus, Ukraine Report, 21 May 2002. This link is also true in other Postcommunist countries. See Z. Sabic and M. Brglez, “The National Identity of Postcommunist Small States in the Process of Accession to the European Union: The Case of Slovenia,” Communist and Postcommunist Studies, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2002, pp. 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9. See Nancy Popson, “The Ukrainian History Textbook: Introducing Children to the “Ukrainian Nation,” Nationalities Papers, Vol. 29, No. 2, 2001, pp. 325–350, and Serhii Plokhy, “The Ghosts of Pereyaslav: Russo-Ukrainian Historical Debates in the Post-Soviet Era,” Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 53, No. 3, 2001, pp. 489–505.Google Scholar

10. Versiya, No. 1, 2002.Google Scholar

11. See Alexander J. Motyl, Sovietology, Rationality, Nationality. Coming to Grips with Nationalism in the USSR (New York: Columbia University Press, 1990), pp. 161–173, and Anatol Lieven, “The Weakness of Russian Nationalism,” Survival, Vol. 41, No. 2, 1999, pp. 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12. See Veljko Vujacic, “Historic Legacies, Nationalist Mobilization and Political Outcomes in Russia and Serbia: A Weberian View,” Theory and Society, Vol. 25, No. 6, 1996, pp. 763–801. See also T. Kuzio, “Russians and Russophones in the Former USSR and Serbs in Yugoslavia: A Comparative Study of Passivity and Mobilization,” RFERL East European Perspectives, Vol. 5, Nos. 13, 14, 15, 2003.Google Scholar

13. See T. Kuzio, “National Identity and Civil Society in Ukraine: Explaining the Yushchenko Phenomenon,” RFERL Newsline, 30 January 2002.Google Scholar

14. Ilya Prizel, “Populism as a Political Force in Postcommunist Russia and Ukraine,” East European Politics and Society, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2001, p. 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15. Olexiy Haran, “Can Ukraine”s Communists and Socialists Evolve to Social Democracy,” Demokratizatsiya, Vol. 9, No. 4, 2001, pp. 570–587.Google Scholar

16. Anna Fournier, “Mapping Identities: Russian Resistance to Linguistic Ukrainianisation in Central and Eastern Ukraine,” Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 54, No. 3, 2002, pp. 427–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17. Stephen Rapawy, Ethnic Reidentification in Ukraine, IPC Staff Paper 90 (Washington: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1997).Google Scholar

18. Nezavisimaya Gazeta, 10 July 2001.Google Scholar

19. Fournier, op. cit., pp. 415–433.Google Scholar

20. See T. Kuzio, “Russian Nationalism Comes under Attack in Ukraine,” RFERL Newsline, 7 February 2002.Google Scholar

21. Tor Bukkvoll, “Off the Cuff Politics—Explaining Russia's Lack of a Ukraine Strategy,” Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 53, No. 8, 2001, p. 1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

22. Ibid., p. 420. See also similar criticisms of the use of a catch-all Russophone label by Lowell Barrington, “Russian-Speakers in Ukraine and Kazakhstan: ‘Nationality,’ ‘Population,’ or Neither?” Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2001, pp. 129–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

23. See T. Kuzio, “Russia Continues to Disrespect Ukrainian Sovereignty,” RFERL Newsline, 9 May 2002.Google Scholar

24. Vedomosti, 23 March 2001.Google Scholar

25. T. Kuzio, “Will Lukashenka Survive as Putin Loses Interest in Union with Belarus?” RFERL Newsline, 16 July 2002.Google Scholar

26. Haran, op. cit., p. 582.Google Scholar

27. Rossiyskaya Gazeta, 3 July 2001.Google Scholar

28. Delovoy Mir, 18 December 1997.Google Scholar

29. RFERL Newsline, 1 December 2000.Google Scholar

30. Rossiyskaya Gazeta, 18 April 2000.Google Scholar

31. Belarusian TV, 11 May 2002.Google Scholar

32. Belapan News Agency, 15–17 March 1999.Google Scholar

33. RFERL Newsline, 1 December 2000.Google Scholar

34. Ibid. Google Scholar

35. See Victor Chudowsky and T. Kuzio, “Does Public Opinion Matter in Ukraine? The case of foreign policy,” Communist and Postcommunist Studies, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2003, pp. 273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

36. Belaplan, 1 January 1999.Google Scholar

37. Rossiyskaya Gazeta, 23 May 1998.Google Scholar

38. Interfax, 30 July 1999.Google Scholar

39. Respublika, 6 July 1999.Google Scholar

40. Yantarnyi Krai, 2 September 1999.Google Scholar

41. Clelia Rontoyanni, A Russian-Belarusian “Union-State”: A Defensive Response to Western Enlargement'? Working Paper 10, 2000, One Europe or Several? (Brighton: University of Sussex, 2000).Google Scholar

42. Obshchaya Gazeta, 8–14 May 1997 and Rabochaya Tribuna, 14 March 1997.Google Scholar

43. Bukkvoll, op. cit., p. 1145.Google Scholar

44. Ibid., p. 1152. Roman Solchanyk takes a different approach to Bukkvoll and this author by accepting all Russian statements towards Ukraine at their face value and thereby ignoring their lack of implementation and their relationship to a virtual foreign policy. See his Ukraine and Russia. The Post-Soviet Transition (Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001).Google Scholar

45. Kuzio, “Russia Continues to Disrespect Ukrainian Sovereignty.”Google Scholar

46. See T. Kuzio, “Antinationalist Campaign to Discredit Our Ukraine,” RFERL Poland, Belarus, Ukraine Report, 9 April 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

47. Rossiyskaya Gazeta, 14 February 2002.Google Scholar

48. See T. Kuzio, Ukraine. State and Nation Building (London: Routledge, 1998), pp. 100–116.Google Scholar

49. One of Putin's first requests to Kuchma was to have Tarasiuk removed (Bukkvoll, op. cit., p. 1155).Google Scholar

50. See T. Kuzio, “Ukraine's Pereiaslav Complex,” RFERL Poland, Belarus, Ukraine Report, 1 May 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

51. Den', 21 May 2002.Google Scholar

52. ITAR-TASS news agency, 20 February 2001.Google Scholar

53. Ukraiina moloda, 12 December 2001.Google Scholar

54. Den', 21 May 2002.Google Scholar

55. (Kuchma), Rossiyskaya Gazeta, 12 February 2002 and Forum, 16 May 2002; (Zlenko) UNIAN, 21 December 2001; (Lytvyn) UNI AN news agency, 14 February, Zerkalo Nedeli, 23 February-1 March and Rossiyskaya Gazeta, 26 March 2002; (Horbulin) Zerkalo Nedeli, 27 October 2001.Google Scholar

56. See T. Kuzio, “Belarusianization or Europeanization? Postelection Ukraine Struggles to Define Its Future,” RFERL Newsline, 24 May 2002, and “Loser Takes All: President Kuchma Coopts Parliament,” RFERL Newsline, 30 May 2002.Google Scholar

57. See Kataryna Wolczuk, “History, Europe and the ‘National Idea': the Official Narrative of National Identity in Ukraine,” Nationalities Papers, Vol. 28, No. 4, 2000, pp. 671–694, and T. Kuzio, “Identity and Nation Building in Ukraine. Defining the ‘Other,'” Ethnicities, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2001, pp. 343–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

58. Den', 21 May 2002.Google Scholar

59. Moscow Vremya, 14 May 2002.Google Scholar