No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 November 2018
Methodology can be defined as “the principles of organized investigation.” It deals primarily with the question how to arrive at substantive knowledge about the subject under investigation. It is an indispensable tool for scientific work without which the quality of the acquired knowledge would be at the best haphazardous and at worst erroneous.
1. McKinney, John C., “Methodology, Procedures and Techniques in Sociology,” in Becker, H. and Boskoff, A., eds., Modern Sociological Theory in Continuity and Change (New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1957, pp. 186–235.Google Scholar
2. A selected bibliography on Slovenes in Carinthia is included in Jože Velikonja, Die Slovenen in Kärnten—Slovenci na Koroškem (Ljubljana: Narodni svet Koroških Slovencev, Zveza slovenskih organizacij, Avtomatika, n.d.). It includes the following fields: bibliographies, 7 entries; important literature on censuses, 15 entries; important literature on schools, 8 entries; selected literature on legal status of Slovenes in Carinthia, 6 entries; global picture, 10 entries; memoranda and important submissions, 10 entries; and selected recent articles in newspapers, 6 entries.Google Scholar
3. Druškovič, Drago, Corinthian Slovenes: Some Aspects of Their Situation. 18 Years after the Signing of the Austrian State Treaty, 2nd complete ed. (Ljubljana: Institute for Ethnic Problems, 1973), p. 11.Google Scholar
4. Ibid., pp. 8–11 and corresponding notes.Google Scholar
5. Memorandum on the Carinthian Slovenes to the Federal Government of Austria, ibid., pp. 61–70.Google Scholar
6. Zwitter, Mirt, “Obnova slovenskega zadružništva na Koroškem po drugi svetovni vojni [Renewal of Slovene cooperatives in Carinthia after World War II],” Naš tednik, Sept. 7 1978, p. 29.Google Scholar
7. Druškovič, , Carinthian Slovenes, p. 112.Google Scholar
8. Quoted in Slovenska država, Oct. 1978.Google Scholar
9. Velikonja, Jože, “Slovene Identity in contemporary Europe,” in Papers in Slovene Studies, 1975, ed. Lencek, Rado L. (New York: Society for Slovene Studies, 1975), pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
10. Driedger, Leo, “Identification with a Territory,” in The Canadian Mosaic, ed. Driedger, Leo (Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1978), p. 16: “Territory is an essential ingredient of any definition of a community. Individuals can identify with a territory, and it is the ground within which ethnic activity can take place.”Google Scholar
11. “The rationale for institutional completeness is that when a minority can develop a social system of its own with control over its institutions, the social action patterns of the group will take place largely within the system.” Driedger, Leo, “Toward a Perspective on Canadian Pluralism: Ethnic Identity in Winnipeg,” Canadian Journal of Sociology, 2 (1977):77–95; L. Comeau and Leo Driedger, “Ethnic Opening and Closing in an Open System,” Social Forces, 57 (1978); Z. R. Breton “Institutional Completeness of Ethnic Communities and Personal Relations to Immigrants,” American Journal of Sociology, 70 (1964):193-205 suggests that religious, educational, and welfare institutions are crucial, while R.J. Joy (Languages in Conflict [Toronto, 1972]) adds the importance of political and economic institutions. F. G. Vallee (“Regionalism and Ethnicity: The French-Canadian Case,” in Card, ed., Perspectives on Regions and Regionalism [Edmonton, 1969]) confirmed Breton's claims by summarizing the need for organization of group structure which influence socialization and ethnic community decision-making. Driedger, Canadian Mosaic, pp. 16–17.Google Scholar