Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T17:44:45.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

East China Sea or South China Sea, they are all China's Seas: comparing nationalism among China's maritime irredentist claims†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Jonathan Dixon
Jonathan Dixon*
Affiliation:
C4ADS, 1100 H St. NW, STE 450, Washington, DC 20005, USA
*
∗Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Much has been made over the past few years of China'vs ambitions of regaining control of its irredentist claims in the East and South China Seas. While some of this speculation focuses on the massive amounts of money the People's Republic of China (PRC) has funneled into its naval modernization program, other analysts are more interested in the drivers behind the increasingly popular sentiment that the country must “reclaim” its lost territories. The Chinese Communist Party can ill afford to ignore the voice of an already disenchanted population if it hopes to stay in power, particularly in regard to matters of national pride. As a result, in dealing with China's irredentist claims, nationalism in particular can be a powerful ideological factor in shaping the nation's foreign policies. This is especially apparent in the case of irredentism, where nationalism can often override diplomatic and strategic imperatives. This paper addresses the question of how does the nationalist discourse vary between two territorial disputes, the East and South China Seas. It uses discourse analysis to examine developing trends among online social media and news sites. This in turn allows for the construction of a framework of how nationalism develops among both elite and grassroots audiences.

Keywords

nationalismirredentismEast China SeaSouth China SeaChinadiscourse analysis
Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 42 , Issue 6 , November 2014 , pp. 1053 - 1071
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

All data have been culled from open-source materials and can be easily accessed via institutional subscriptions to academic journals. This paper is only being submitted to the Nationalities Papers for consideration and has received no outside funding. This is the sole work of the author, Jonathan Dixon, and contains nothing illegal, libelous, or fraudulent.

References

Amer, Ramses. 2014. “China, Vietnam, and the South China Sea: Disputes and Dispute Management.” Ocean Development and International Law 45 (1): 17–40.Google Scholar
Chang, Maria Hsia. 1998. “Chinese Irredentist Nationalism: The Magician's Last Trick.” Comparative Strategy 17 (1): 83–100.Google Scholar
Chang, Felix K. 2012. “China's Naval Rise and the South China Sea: An Operational Assessment.” Orbis 56 (1): 19–38.Google Scholar
Chen, Zhimin. 2005. “Nationalism, Internationalism, and Chinese Foreign Policy.” Journal of Contemporary China 14 (42): 35–53.Google Scholar
Chen, Yinghong. 2011. “From Campus Racism to Cyber Racism: Discourse of Race and Chinese Nationalism.” The China Quarterly 207 (1): 561–579.Google Scholar
Chung, Chien-Peng. 1998. “The Diaoyu/Tiaoyutai/Senkaku Islands Dispute: Domestic Politics and the Limits of Diplomacy.” American Asian Review 16 (3): 135–164.Google Scholar
Chung, Chien-Peng. 2007. “Resolving China's Island Disputes: A Two-Level Game Analysis.” Journal of Chinese Political Science 12 (1): 49–70.Google Scholar
Denk, Erdem. 2005. “Interpreting a Geographical Expression in a Nineteenth Century Cession Treaty and the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands Dispute.” The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 20 (1): 97–116.Google Scholar
Downs, Erica Stretcker, and Saunders, Philip C. 1998. “Legitimacy and the Limits of Nationalism: China and the Diaoyu Islands.” International Security 23 (3): 114–146.Google Scholar
Fravel, M. Taylor. 2011. “China's Strategy in the South China Sea.” Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs 33 (3): 292–319.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Robert, and Larner, Jeremy. 2013. “The Demography of Chinese Nationalism: A Field-Experimental Approach.” China Quarterly 213 (1): 189–204.Google Scholar
Hughes, Christopher. 2011. “Reclassifying Chinese Nationalism: The Geopolitik Turn.” The Journal of Contemporary China 20 (71): 601–620.Google Scholar
Jie, Ma, and Balfour, Frederik. 2012. “China Protests Erupt as Japanese Group Lands on Disputed Island.” Bloomberg BusinessWeek. August 20. Accessed March 10, 2014. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012–08–20/china-protests-erupt-as-japanese-group-lands-on-disputed-island.html Google Scholar
King, Gary, Pan, Jennfier, and Roberts, Margaret E. 2013. “How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression.” American Political Science Review 107 (2): 326–343.Google Scholar
Kleinsteiber, Meghan. 2013. “Nationalism and Domestic Politics as Drivers of Maritime Conflict.” SAIS Review of International Affairs 33 (2): 15–19.Google Scholar
Li, Mingsheng. 2009. “Chinese Nationalism in an Unequal Cyber War.” China Media Research 5 (4): 63–79.Google Scholar
Li, Jinming. 2011. “South China Sea: Disputes and Great Powers.” Contemporary International Relations 21 (4): 69–92.Google Scholar
Malek, Melda. 2013. “A Legal Assessment of China's Historic Claims in the South China Sea.” Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs 5(1): 28–36.Google Scholar
Pan, Zhongqi. 2007. “Sino-Japanese Dispute of the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands: The Pending Controversy from the Chinese Perspective.” Journal of Chinese Political Science 12 (1): 71–92.Google Scholar
Reilly, James. 2012. Strong Society, Smart State: The Rise of Pubic Opinion in China's Japan Policy. Chichester: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Reilly, James. 2014. “A Wave to Worry About? Public Opinions, Foreign Policy, and China's Anti-Japan Protests.” Journal of Contemporary China 23 (86): 197–215.Google Scholar
Shen, Simon. 2004. “Nationalism or Nationalist Foreign Policy? Contemporary Chinese Nationalism and its Role in Shaping Chinese Foreign Policy in Response to the Belgrade Embassy Bombing.” Politics 24 (2): 122–130.Google Scholar
Tang, Wenfang, and Darr, Benjamin. 2012. “Chinese Nationalism and Its Political and Social Origins.” Journal of Contemporary China 21 (77): 811–826.Google Scholar
Tok, Sow Keat. 2010. “Nationalism-On-Demand? When Chinese Sovereignty Goes Online.” In Online Chinese Nationalism and China's Bilateral Relations, edited by Shin, Simon and Breslin, Shaun, 15–17. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2014. East China Sea Brief, February 10. http://www.eia.gov/countries/analysisbriefs/east_china_sea/east_china_sea.pdf Google Scholar
Wang, Chih-ming. 2009. “Tracking Baodiao: Diaspora, Sovereignty, and Chinese American Resistance.” Chinese America: History and Perspectives 23 (1): 130–136.Google Scholar
Zhang, Yuntao, and Tomlinson, John. 2012. “Three Constituencies of Online Dissent in China.” Chinese Journalism of Communication 5 (1): 55–60.Google Scholar
Zhao, Suisheng. 2007. “Foreign Policy Implications of Chinese Nationalism Revisited: The Strident Turn.” Journal of Contemporary China 22 (82): 535–553.Google Scholar