No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 November 2018
In the past decade we have witnessed increased interest on the part of psychologists and educators in developmental and preschool psychology, as well as in the application of psychological findings to the problems of learning disorders. The realization that cognitive development depends upon continuous interaction between the developing organism and the environment gave impetus to the current research on preschool children.
Even a superficial review of psychological literature will reveal worldwide interest in developmental and preschool psychology. Names like Piaget and Inhalder in Switzerland, as well as Bruner and Kagan in the USA, are internationally recognized. Very few Western psychologists, however, will recognize Kostiuk, Zaporozhets or Zinchenko as Ukrainian psychologists. Among Western psychologists they are simply recognized as “Soviet” psychologists. While most Western psychologists recognize that the Soviet Union as a political entity is not identical with Russia, some unfortunately identify psychologists in the Soviet Union as Russian psychologists.
1. Voytko, V. I., and Hubko, A. T., Voprosy Psikhologii, 1975, 6: 164.Google Scholar
2. Duijker, H. C. J., and Jaboson, E. H., Eds., International Directory of Psychologists (Assen-The Netherlands: Royal Vangorcum Ltd., 1966).Google Scholar
3. Slobin, D. I., Ed., Handbook of Soviet Psychology. (White Plains, N.Y.: International Arts and Science Press, 1966).Google Scholar
4. Baley, S., Z psycholohiz tvorchosty Shevchenka (Lviv, 1916).Google Scholar
5. Little, R. D., “The Academy of Pedagogical Sciences; the political role,” Soviet Studies, 1968, 19(3): 387–397.Google Scholar
6. Holowinsky, I. Z., “Soviet Research Institute of Psychology,” American Psychologist, 1975, 30: 521.Google Scholar
7. Leontiev, A. N., “Karl Marx i psikhologitcheskaia nauka,” Voprosy Psikhologii, 1968, 14: 3–16.Google Scholar
8. Lysenkova, L. F., “Nekotorye problemy detskoi i pedadogitcheskoi psikhologii v trudakh N. K. Krupskay,” Voprosy Psikhologii, 1979, 2: 27–36.Google Scholar
9. Botcharova, C. P., “Problemy psikhologii pamiate v trudakh P. I. Zinchenko,” Voprosy Psikhologii, 1978, 5: 119–124.Google Scholar
10. Zaporozhets, A. V., “K 75-let so dnia razhdeniya,” Voprosy Psikhologii, 1980, 5: 184.Google Scholar
11. Proskura, O. V., “Iauleneia egotsentrisma v ponimanu doshkolnikami pros-transtvennykh otnoshenii,” Voprosy Psikhologii, 1975, 4: 44–51.Google Scholar
12. Maksymenko, S. D., and Bekh, I. D., “Psikhologicheskii analys mekhanisma classificatsii u mladshykh shkolnykov,” Voprosy Psikhologii, 1980, 5: 78–79.Google Scholar
13. Sereda, H. K., and Snopyk, B. I., “K problemy iedentstva mekhanismov kratkovremennoi i dolgo-vremennoi pamiati,” Voprosy Psikhologii, 1970, 6: 60–75.Google Scholar
14. Zinchenko, V. P., Munipov, V. M., and Gordon, V. M., “Issledovanie vysualnogo myshkenia” Voprosy Psikhologii, 1973, 2: 3–14.Google Scholar
15. Zinchenko, T. P., “O modeli informatsionnogo poiska,” Voprosy Psikhologii, 1970, 16(2): 151–154.Google Scholar
16. Lytvyniuk, A. A., “Comparative analysis of the activity of preschool children with real objects and with their schematic representations,” Soviet Psychology, 1967-68, 2:7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Proskura, O. V., “Rol’ obucheneia v formirovaneie seriiatsonnykh deistvei u dochkolnikov,” Voprosy Psikhologii, 1969, 1: 37–46.Google Scholar
18. Proskura, O. V., “Analis umovy-osnovnoho zasob u navchannia rozviozuvannia zadach,” Doshlinne Vykhovannia, 1973, 4: 15–21.Google Scholar
19. Voytko, V. I., “The applied research in the research institute of psychology of Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic,” Voprosy Psikhologii, 1978, 6: 178–183.Google Scholar
20. Zaporozeths, O. V., “K voprosu ob obuchenii vospytanii i razvytii ditei shetyletnogo vozrasta,” Sovyetskaya Pedagogica, 1973. 1: 43–48.Google Scholar
21. Snopyk, V. I., “Psykholohichno-vykhovna Kharaktersytyka uchniv,” Radianska Skhola, 1977, 10: 43–48.Google Scholar
22. Bozhovych, L. I., “Etapy formirovanya lichnosti v ontogenezi,” Voprosy Psikhologii, 1979, 2: 47–57.Google Scholar
23. Kostiuk, H. S., “Voprosy rozvytia detei v sovietskoy psikhologii,” Voprosy Psikhologii, 1967, 6: 24–45.Google Scholar
24. Maksymenko, S. D., “Nova konstytutsiia SRSR i mozhlyvist rozvytku psykholohichnoi nauky,” Radianska Shkola, 1978, 6: 37–47.Google Scholar
25. Kairov, L. A., “Novaia Programma RPSS; Pedagogitcheskaia nauka,” Sovyetskaia Pedagogika, 1963, 3: 1.Google Scholar
26. Kubiyovych, V., Ed. Ukraine (A Concise Encyclopedia) vol. 2. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1971).Google Scholar
27. Venzhyk, L., “Stan i zavdannia vykhovnoii roboty z dit'my rannioho viku,” Doshkilne Vykhovannia, 1973, 1: 1–10.Google Scholar
28. Bohush, A. M., “Rozvytok movy iak pryhotuvannia do vstupu y skholu,” Doshkilne Vykhovannia, 1973, 1: 5–11.Google Scholar
29. Poddiakov, N. N., “Sovremennoe sostovanoe i perspektyvy issledovaniya v oblasty dochkolnolko vospytoniya,” Voprosy Psikhologii, 1982, 6: 32–34.Google Scholar
30. Tykhovod, L., “Literatura dla ditey pro podvyh narodu u Velykii Vitchyzniannii Vijni,” Doshkilne Vykhovannia, 1974, 10: 43–44.Google Scholar
31. Saphonova, A., “Pys'mennyk-voin, pys'mennyk-vykhovatel,” Doshkilne Vykhovannia, 1974, 3: 11–14.Google Scholar
32. Krasnobrodska, R., “Vykovannia lubovi do ridnoho kraju zasobamy muzyky,” Doshkilne Vykhovannia, 1973, 9: 23–25.Google Scholar
33. Loboda, S., and Kusenko, N., “Vchymo lubyty ridnu Bat'kivshchynu,” Doshkilne Vykhovannia, 1974, 4: 26–26.Google Scholar