Article contents
The Croatian Spring, 1971: Socialism in one Republic?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 November 2018
Extract
The Yugoslav critique of Stalinism and the concomitant elaboration of the Titoist model of self-managing socialism continue to bewilder observers East and West, as well as the Yugoslavs themselves. Thus, until recently, Chinese communist criticism that Yugoslavia had sold out to the West and become its Trojan Horse in the communist world was neatly balanced by those Western critiques which see in Titoism a communist Trojan Horse to penetrate Western defenses. Some wonder whether Yugoslavia is really a self-managing democracy or a single-party dictatorship. Others ask themselves whether Yugoslavia's decentralized economy is capitalist or socialist. Many fear for Yugoslavia's territorial integrity and national independence, particularly since Tito's death on May 4, 1980.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Association for the Study of Nationalities, 1982
References
1. On the “four Ds,” see Lendvai, Paul, Eagles in Cobwebs (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1969), pp. 140–72; and Dennison I. Rusinow, “Crisis in Croatia,” Part II, American Universities Field Staff Reports (A UFSR), SE Europe Series, XIX, 5 (September 1972), pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
2. Quoted by Zukin, Sharon, Beyond Marx and Tito (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1975), p. 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Lendvai, , Eagles in Cobwebs, p. 54.Google Scholar
4. Sterling, Claire, “Tito's New Balancing Act,” The Atlantic, 231, 6 (June 1973), p. 44.Google Scholar
5. Sweezy, Paul, cited by Denitch, Bogdan D., The Legitimation of a Revolution (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1976), p. 10.Google Scholar
6. “Constitutional System of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia,” Yugoslav Survey (Belgrade), XV, 3 (August 1974), p. 52.Google Scholar
7. Singleton, Fred, “Yugoslavia: Democratic Centralism and Market Socialism,” The World Today (London), 29, 4 (April 1973), p. 168.Google Scholar
8. Rusinow, Dennison I., “Crisis in Croatia,” Part I, AUFSR, SE Europe Series, XIX, 4 (June 1972), p. 10; see also Gary K. Bertsch, “The Revival of Nationalisms,” Problems of Communism, XXII, 6 (November-December 1973), pp. 1–15; Barbara Jancar, “Yugoslavia: The Case for a Loyal Opposition under Communism,” in Comparative Communism, eds. Gary K. Bertsch & Thomas W. Ganschow (San Fransicso: Freeman, 1976), pp. 205–20; George Schöpflin, “The Ideology of Croatian Nationalism,” Survey (London), 19, 1 (Winter 1973), pp. 122–46; and Paul Shoup, Communism and the Yugoslav National Question (New York: Columbia University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
9. Singleton, , “Yugoslavia,” pp. 161–62.Google Scholar
10. Cepo, Zlatko, “Proleterski internacionalizam danas” (“Proletarian Internationalism Today”), VUS (Zagreb), No. 1251 (May 1, 1976), p. 22; emphasis added.Google Scholar
11. Rusinow, , “Crisis in Croatia,” II, pp. 2, 6.Google Scholar
12. Lendvai, , Eagles in Cobwebs, p. 139.Google Scholar
13. Klein, George, “The Role of Ethnic Politics in the Czechoslovak Crisis of 1968 and the Yugoslav Crisis of 1971,” Studies in Comparative Communism, VIII, 4 (Winter 1975), p. 360.Google Scholar
14. Rusinow, D.I., “The Price of Pluralism,” AUFSR, SE Europe Series, XVIII, 1 (July 1971), p. 10.Google Scholar
15. Kladjanin, , quoted in Rusinow, “Crisis in Croatia,” 1, p. 13.Google Scholar
16. Planinc, , quoted in ibid., p. 12.Google Scholar
17. Anonymous, , quoted in Lendvai, Eagles in Cobwebs, p. 119.Google Scholar
18. Rusinow, D.I., “Yugoslavia's Return to Leninism: Notes on the Tenth Congress of the Yugoslav League of Communists,” AUFSR, SE Europe Series, XXI, 1 (June 1974), pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
19. Ralić, Prvoslav, “Dogma komandovanja partije” (“The Dogma of Party Command”), Komunist (Belgrade), No. 981 (January 5, 1976), p. 22.Google Scholar
20. Lendvai, , Eagles in Cobwebs, pp. 132–33.Google Scholar
21. Rusinow, , “Yugoslavia's Return to Leninism,” pp. 4–5; see also Rusinow, D.I., The Yugoslav Experiment, 1948–1974 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977).Google Scholar
22. Title of Chapter 8 of Dusko Doder's perceptive The Yugoslavs (New York: Random House, 1978), p. 116.Google Scholar
23. Tito, Josip-Broz, “The LCY in the Struggle for the Further Development of Socialist Self-Managing and Nonaligned Yugoslavia,” Report to the Eleventh Party Congress, Socialist Thought and Practice (Belgrade), XVIII, 6 (June 1978), p. 59.Google Scholar
24. Kardelj, Edvard, Pravci razvoja političkog sistema socijalističkog samoupravljanja (Directions of Development of the Political System of Socialist Self-Management), 2nd ed. (Belgrade: Komunist, 1978), p. 107. This last major work by the late Kardelj (died in 1979) has emerged as his magnum opus, the theoretical basis for deliberations at the Eleventh Party Congress, and a summary of the Yugoslav experiment (Titoism).Google Scholar
25. Some Marxist humanist theorists imply that the Leninist party is Stalinist: see Svetozar Stojanović, Geschichte und Parteibewusstsein (Munich: Carl Hanser, 1978), p. 39. However, the notion of communists as the vanguard of the proletariat, capable of seeing further than the masses, was articulated already in 1848 by Marx and Engels in the Communist Manifesto.Google Scholar
26. See Berger, Peter L. & Luckmann, Thomas, The Social Construction of Reality (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1967), p. 102.Google Scholar
27. See Human Rights in Yugoslavia, eds. Gruenwald, O. & Rosenblum-Cole, K. (forthcoming).Google Scholar
28. Feuer, Lewis S., Ideology and the Ideologists (New York: Harper & Row, 1975), p. 197.Google Scholar
29. See Gruenwald, O., The Yugoslav Search for Man (South Hadley, Mass.: J.F. Bergin, 1982).Google Scholar
30. Leonhard, Wolfgang, Three Faces of Marxism (New York: Holt, 1974), p. 351.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by