Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:47:51.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Continuity and Change in the Regimes of Ethnicity in Austria, Germany, the USSR/Russia, and Turkey: Varieties of Ethnic Regimes and Hypotheses for Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Sener Akturk*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley, USA. Email: [email protected]

Extract

After World War I, Austria, Germany, Russia, and Turkey moved from dynastic-imperial political regimes to quasi-republican regimes justified on the basis of popular legitimacy. Prior to this transition, in the management and political (in)significance of ethnic categories these empires broadly resembled each other. After World War I, the core successor states to these four empires pursued radically different policies in dealing with ethnicity as a social category. One can therefore speak of distinct Austrian, German, Soviet/Russian, and Turkish models in managing multi-ethnic populations, models which persisted since the 1920s. Both the emergence of different regimes of ethnicity in the 1920s and the persistence of these policies throughout the twentieth century present very intriguing puzzles for political science. It is not possible to “explain” either the emergence or the persistence of these distinct policies within the confines of this paper. Instead, the major differences between state policies in these four countries will be described in detail in order to highlight the important differences and the most significant features of each case. Since the major contours of these policies did not change throughout the twentieth century, I will limit myself to a brief description of period-specific nuances in the distinct national trajectories between the 1920s and the 1990s. Finally, I will focus on a period of significant change in the late 1990s in Germany, Russia, and Turkey, and inquire as to the causes of these changes.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aksamaz, Ali İhsan. Kafkasya'dan Karadeniz'e Lazların Tarihsel Yolculuğu. Istanbul: Çiviyaziları, 1997.Google Scholar
Aksamaz, Ali İhsan. Dil-Tarih-Kültür-Gelenekleriyle Lazlar. Istanbul: Sorun Yayınları, 2000.Google Scholar
Aktar, Ayhan. Varlık Vergisi ve “Türkleştirme” Politikaları. Istanbul: İletişim, 2000.Google Scholar
Akturk, Sener. “Perspectives on Assyrian Nationalism.” Hemispheres: The Tufts University Journal of International Relations 25 (2002): 134–55.Google Scholar
Allworth, Edward, ed. Central Asia: 130 Years of Russian Dominance. A Historical Overview. 3rd ed. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Arel, Dominique. “Fixing Ethnicity in Identity Documents: The Rise and Fall of Passport Nationality in Russia.” National Council for Eurasian and East European Research Papers, 12 December 2001.Google Scholar
Barker, Thomas M. The Slovenes of Carinthia: A National Minority Problem. New York: Studia Slovenica/League of CSA, 1960.Google Scholar
Barkey, Karen, and von Hagen, Mark, eds. After Empire: Multiethnic Societies and Nation-Building. The Soviet Union and the Russian, Ottoman, and Habsburg Empires. Boulder: Westview, 1997.Google Scholar
Barth-Scalmani, Gunda, Kurpian, Hermann J. W., and Mazohl-Wallnig, Brigitte. “National Identity or Regional Identity: Austria versus Tyrol/Salzburg.” In Austrian Historical Memory and National Identity, edited by Bischof, Günther and Pelinka, Anton. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1997.Google Scholar
Bennigsen, Alexandre A. Muslim National Communism in the Soviet Union: A Revolutionary Strategy for the Colonial World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Bilge, Yakup. Geçmişten Günümüze Süryaniler. Istanbul: Zvi-Geyik, 2001.Google Scholar
Brenner, Michael. “No Place of Honor.” In Germany in Transit: Nation and Migration, 1955–2005, edited by Göktürk, Deniz, Kaes, Anton, and Gramling, David. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Çağaptay, Soner. “Citizenship Policies in Interwar Turkey.” Nations and Nationalism 9, No. 4 (2003): 601–20.Google Scholar
Çağaptay, Soner. “Race, Assimilation, and Kemalism: Turkish Nationalism and the Minorities in the 1930s.” Middle Eastern Studies 40, No. 3 (2004): 86101.Google Scholar
Dündar, Fuat. Türkiye Nüfus Sayımlarında Azınlıklar. İstanbul: Çiviyazıları, 2000.Google Scholar
Elste, Alfred. Karntens braune Elite. Klagenfurt, Ljubljana, and Vienna: Hermagoras, 1997.Google Scholar
Filla, Wilhelm et al. Am Rande Österreichs: Ein Beitrag zur Soziologie der österreichischen Volksgruppen. Vienna: Wilhelm Braumüller, Universitats-Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1982.Google Scholar
Fisher, Alan. The Crimean Tatars. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Göktürk, Deniz, Kaes, Anton, and Gramling, David, eds. Germany in Transit: Nation and Migration, 1955–2005. Berkeley: University of California Press, forthcoming 2006.Google Scholar
Gullberg, Tom. State, Territory and Identity: The Principle of National Self-Determination, the Question of Territorial Sovereignty in Carinthia and other Post Habsburg Territories after the First World War. Abo: Abo Akademi University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Habiçoğlu, Bedri. Kafkasya'dan Anadolu'ya Göçler ve İskanları. Istanbul: Nart, 1993.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Francine. Empire of Nations: Ethnographic Knowledge and the Making of the Soviet Union. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Holzer, Werner, and Münz, Rainer. “Ethnic Diversity in Eastern Austria: The Case of Burgenland.” Nationalities Papers 23, No. 4 (1995): 697724.Google Scholar
Hosking, Geoffrey. The First Socialist State: A History of the Soviet Union from Within. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Joppke, Christian. Immigration and the Nation-State: The United States, Germany, and Great Britain. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Kafaoğlu, Arslan Başer. Varlık Vergisi Gerçeği. Istanbul: Kaynak Yayınları, 2002.Google Scholar
Khalid, Adeeb. The Politics of Muslim Cultural Reform: Jadidism in Central Asia. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Koçiva, Selma. Lazona: Laz Halk Gerçekliği Üzerine. Istanbul: Tüm Zamanlar Yaymcılık, 2000.Google Scholar
Kotsch, Detlef, ed. Minderheitenpolitik in der SBZ/DDR nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg: Die Sorben, sowjetische Besatzungsherrschaft und die staatliche Sorbenpolitik. Potsdam: Veröffentlichungen des Brandenburgischen Landeshauptarchivs/Verlag für Berlin-Brandenburg, 2000.Google Scholar
Kühl, Jorgen. The “Schleswig Experience”: The National Minorities in the Danish–German Border Area. Aabenraa: Institut for Graenseregionsforskning, 1998.Google Scholar
Leggewie, Claus. Multi Kulti: Spielregeln für die Vielvölkerrepublik. Nördlingen: Rotbuch, 1990.Google Scholar
Leggewie, Claus, and Şenocak, Zafer, eds. Deutsche Türken—Das Ende der Geduld. Hamburg: Rowohlt, 1993.Google Scholar
Lesiuk, Wieslaw. Danisch-deutsche Erfahrungen in der Lösung von ethnisch-nationalen Problemen im Grenzgebiet. Eine Darstellung aus polnischer Sicht. Opole: Instytut Slaski w Opolu, 1997.Google Scholar
Ludat, Irina. “A Question of the Greater Fear.” In Germany in Transit: Nation and Migration, 1955–2005, edited by Göktürk, Deniz, Kaes, Anton, and Gramling, David. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Martin, Terry. The Affirmative Action Empire: Nations and Nationalism in the Soviet Union, 1923–1939. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Justin. “Muslims in Ottoman Europe: Population from 1800 to 1912.” Nationalities Papers 28, No. 1 (2000): 2943.Google Scholar
Moser, Manfred. “Sprachliche und soziale Identitat der Slowenen in Karnten.” In Kein einig Volk von Brüdern: Studien zum Mehrheiten-/Minderheitenproblem am Beispiel Karntens. Vienna: Verlag für Gesellschaftskritik, 1982.Google Scholar
Nur, Rıza. Hayat ve Hatıratım. Vol. 3. Istanbul: Altındağ, 1968.Google Scholar
Okutan, M. Çağatay. Tek Parti Döneminde Azınlık Politikaları. Istanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2004.Google Scholar
Oran, Baskın. Türkiye'de Azınlıklar: Kavramlar, Teori, Lozan, İç Mevzuat, İçtihat, Uygulama. Istanbul: İletişim, 2004.Google Scholar
Özcan, Yelda. İstanbul'da, Diyarbakir'da Azalırken. Istanbul: Belge, 1996.Google Scholar
Özgün, M. Recai. Lazlar. Istanbul: Çiviyazıları, 1996.Google Scholar
Piper, Nicola. Racism, Nationalism and Citizenship: Ethnic Minorities in Britain and Germany. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate, 1998.Google Scholar
Poulton, Hugh. “The Muslim Experience in the Balkan States, 1919–1991.” Nationalities Papers 28, No. 1 (2000): 4566.Google Scholar
Putz, Gertraud. “Die Karntner Slowenen und die Kirche.” Diss., Faculty of Theology, University of Salzburg, 1982.Google Scholar
Roth, Joseph. The Radetzky March. New York: The Overlook Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Thomas O. Austrian Neutrality in Postwar Europe: The Domestic Roots of a Foreign Policy. Vienna: Wilhelm Braumüller Universitats-Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1972.Google Scholar
Schmalz-Jacobsen, Cornelia, and Hansen, Georg, eds. Kleines Lexikon der ethnischen Minderheiten in Deutschland. Munich: Beck'sche Reihe, 1997.Google Scholar
Schulte, Christoph, ed. Deutschtum und Judentum: Ein Disput unter Juden aus Deutschland. Stuttgart: Reclam, 1993.Google Scholar
Slezkine, Yuri. “The USSR as a Communal Apartment, or How a Socialist State Promoted Ethnic Particularism.” Slavic Review 53 (1994): 414–52.Google Scholar
Slezkine, Yuri. The Jewish Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Steensen, Thomas. “Frühe Beziehungen zwischen Sorben und Nordfriesen (I) Der Verband der nationalen Minderheiten in Deutschland und die Europaischen Nationalitatenkongresse.” In Friesen und Sorben. Beitrage zu enier Tagung über zwei Minderheiten in Deutschland, edited by Kay Holander, Reimer and Steensen, Thomas. Bredstedt: Nordfriisk Instituut, 1991.Google Scholar
Sully, Melani A. A Contemporary History of Austria. New York: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar
Suny, Ronald Grigor. Revenge of the Past: Nationalism, Revolution, and the Collapse of the Soviet Union. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Suny, Ronald Grigor. The Soviet Experiment. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Suppan, Arnold. Die österreichischen Volksgruppen: Tendenzen ihrer gesellschaftlichen Entwicklung im 20. Jahrhundert. Munich: Oldenbourg, 1983.Google Scholar
Sussmuth, Rita. “Report of the Independent Commission on Immigration.” In Germany in Transit: Nation and Migration, 1955–2005, edited by Gökturk, Deniz, Kaes, Anton, and Gramling, David. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Teebken, Andrea, and Maria Christiansen, Eva, eds. Living Together: The Minorities in the German–Danish Border Regions. Flensburg: European Center for Minority Rights, 2001.Google Scholar
Valentin, Hellwig. Die Idee einer “Karntner Republik” in den Jahren 1918/19. Klagenfurt: Verlag des Karntner Landesarchives, 1992.Google Scholar
Walker, Edward W. Dissolution: Sovereignty and the Breakup of the Soviet Union. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003.Google Scholar
Wernicke, Christian. “The Long Road to the German Passport.” In Germany in Transit: Nation and Migration, 1955–2005, edited by Göktürk, Deniz, Kaes, Anton, and Gramling, David. Berkeley: University of California Press, forthcoming 2006.Google Scholar
Zank, Wolfgang. The German Melting-Pot: Multiculturality in Historical Perspective. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1998.Google Scholar