Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T01:18:00.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conflict resolution after the 2008 Georgia–Russia War: the Taiwan and Kosovo models as tools for mobilization and comparison

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Bruno Coppieters
Bruno Coppieters*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (Free University of Brussels)
*
∗Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Taiwan model of conflict transformation and the Kosovo model of conflict settlement have specific features, and are useful for analyzing the Georgian and Russian policies toward Abkhazia and South Ossetia. There is a similarity between the Georgian strategy of engagement and the Taiwan model, with its declared readiness to interact with the other party regardless of any setbacks arising over the issue of status. Unlike the Taiwan model, however, the Georgian strategy includes no concrete view on how to involve the authorities controlling the breakaway territories or, in particular, how to have a positive impact on their relations with the outside world. A comparison between the Kosovo model and Russian policies toward these two entities demonstrates that, in deciding to recognize Abkhazia and South Ossetia, Moscow largely drew on the moral and legal arguments put forward for the recognition of Kosovo. Russia has established political oversight over these entities, to a certain extent mirroring the Western policy of supervised independence for Kosovo. But Russia is still unable to adopt a conflict resolution policy toward Abkhazia, South Ossetia, and Georgia that is based on regional integration prospects, in contrast to Western policies toward the Balkans.

Keywords

conflict resolutionsecessionSouth OssetiaAbkhaziaTaiwan
Type
Special Section
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 40 , Issue 5 , September 2012 , pp. 677 - 701
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antonenko, Oksana. “Frozen Uncertainty: Russia and the Conflict over Abkhazia.” Statehood and Security: Georgia After the Rose Revolution. Ed. Coppieters, Bruno and Legvold, Robert. Cambridge, MA: MIT P, 2005. 205–269. Print.Google Scholar
Asmus, Ronald D. A Little War that Shook the World: Georgia, Russia, and the Future of the West. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. Print.Google Scholar
Brilmayer, Lea. “Groups, Histories and International Law.” International Law and the Rise of Nations. Ed. Beck, Robert J. and Ambrosio, Thomas. New York: Chatham House, 2002. 197–205. Print.Google Scholar
Charap, Samuel, and Welt, Cory. A More Proactive U.S. Approach to the Georgia Conflicts. Center for American Progress. 15 Feb. 2011. 9. Web. 18 July 2011. http://www.american-progress.org/issues/2011/02/georgia_report.html Google Scholar
Chi, Chu. Taiwan's Relations with Mainland China: A Tail Wagging Two Dogs. Abingdon: Routledge, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
Civil Georgia. “Georgia Recognizes Circassian ‘Genocide'.” 20 May 2011. Web. 19 July 2011. <http://www.civil.ge/eng/article.php?id=23472>..>Google Scholar
Civil Georgia. “Medvedev: No Chance of Having Ties with Saakashvili.” 24 June 2010. Web. 17 July 2011. <http://www.civil.ge/eng/article.php?id=22447>..>Google Scholar
Civil Georgia. “Saakashvili: Education System Top Priority.” 22 July 2010. Web. 17 July 2011. <http://www.civil.ge/eng/article.php?id=22541>..>Google Scholar
Civil Georgia. “Saakashvili on Clinton's Georgia Visit.” 7 June 2012. Web. 14 June 2012. <http://www.civil.ge/eng/article.php?id=24858>..>Google Scholar
Civil Georgia. “Saakashvili Speaks of ‘United Caucasus’ in UN Speech.” 24 Sep. 2010. Web. 19 July 2011. <http://www.civil.ge/eng/article.php?id=22696>..>Google Scholar
Civil Georgia. “Saakashvili Talks on ‘Total Defense’ to Army Top Brass.” 28 July 2010. Web. 17 July 2011. <http://www.civil.ge/eng/article.php?id=22556>..>Google Scholar
Cooley, Alexander, and Mitchell, Lincoln A. “Engagement without Recognition: A New Strategy toward Abkhazia and Eurasia's Unrecognized States.” The Washington Quarterly 33.4 (Oct. 2010): 59–73. Print.Google Scholar
Coppieters, Bruno, Kovziridze, Tamara, and Leonardy, Uwe. “Federalization of Foreign Relations: Discussing Alternatives for the Georgian-Abkhaz Conflict.” Working Paper 2. Cambridge, MA: Caspian Studies Program, Harvard U., Oct. 2003. Web. 18 July 2011. <http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/publication/3065/federalization_of_foreign_relations.html>..>Google Scholar
Coppieters, Bruno. “The EU and Georgia: Time Perspectives in Conflict Resolution.” Occasional Paper 70. European Union Institute for Security Studies. December 2007. Web. 17 July 2011. <http://www.iss.europa.eu/uploads/media/occ70.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Coppieters, Bruno. konfliqtis gadawyveta 2008 wlis saqarTvelo-ruseTis omis Semdeg: taivanisa da kosovos modelebi, rogorc mobilizaciisa da Sedarebis instrumentebi. Tbilisi: Caucasian Institute for Peace, Democracy and Development (CIPDD), 2010. Web. 17 July 2011. <http://www.cipdd.org/files/30_526_126266_Bruno.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Coppieters, Bruno. “Kosovo and the Question of a Just Secession.” Moral Constraints on War: Principles and Cases. Eds Coppieters, Bruno and Fotion, Nick. 2nd ed. Lanham, MD: Lexington, 2008. 237–259. Print.Google Scholar
Coppieters, Bruno. “Razreshenie konflikta posle gruzinsko-rossiiskoi voiny 2008 g. “Taivan'skaya” i “kosovskaya” modeli kak instrumenty mobilizatsii i sravneniya.” Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnie otnosheniya 4 (2011): 89–104. Print.Google Scholar
de Waal, Thomas. Georgia's Choices: Charting a Future in Uncertain Times. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 2011. Web. 17 July 2011. http://carnegieendowment.org/2011/06/13/georgia-s-choices-charting-future-in-uncertain-times/lid Google Scholar
Diez, Thomas. “'Roots’ of Conflict, Conflict Transformation and EU Influence.” N.d. Web. 17 July 2011. <ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/improving/docs/g_ser_conflict-security_diez.pdf>..>Google Scholar
The European Commission and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. “ENP Country Progress Report, Georgia 2011.” Brussels, 15 May 2012. Web. 11 June 2012. <http://ec.europa.eu/world/enp/docs/2012_enp_pack/georgia_memo_2011_en.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Fischer, Sabine. “How to Engage with Abkhazia?” ISS Analysis, Nov. 2010. Web. 17 July 2011. http://www.iss.europa.eu/fr/publications/detail-page/article/how-to-engage-with-abkhazia/ Google Scholar
Francis, Céline. Conflict Resolution and Status: The Case of Georgia and Abkhazia (1989–2008). Brussels: VUB, 2011. Web. 17 July 2011. http://poli.vub.ac.be/publi/pdf-files/Conflict%20Resolution%20and%20Status%20Publication%20version%202011.pdf Google Scholar
Gegechidze, Archil. “‘The Geneva Process’: Fears, Opportunities and Prospects.” International Alert: International Engagement in the Georgian-Abkhaz Conflict Resolution Process, May 2010:86–92. Web. 17 July 2011. http://www.international-alert.org/sites/default/files/publications/Georgian-Abkhaz.pdf Google Scholar
Goble, Paul. “Newly-Approved Military Doctrine Reaffirms Baku's Right to Use Force to Liberate Occupied Territories.” Azerbaijan in the World 3.12 (15 June 2010). Web. 17 July 2011. <http://ada.edu.az/uploads/file/bw/pdf346.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Gordadzé, Thorniké. “L'empire contre l'État-nation. L'Ossétie du Sud au coeur du conflit russo-géorgien (1922–2008)”. Ordres et désordres au Caucase. Ed. Merlin, Aude and Serrano, Silvia. Bruxelles: Éditions de l'Université de Bruxelles, 2010. 47–76. Print.Google Scholar
Government of Georgia. “Action Plan for Engagement.” 6 July 2010. Web. 17 July 2011. <http://www.civil.ge/files/files/AP-en.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Government of Georgia. “Law on Occupied Territories of Georgia.” 23 Oct. 2008. Web. 17 July 2011. http://www.venice.coe.int/docs/2009/CDL(2009)004-e.asp Google Scholar
Government of Georgia. “State Strategy on Occupied Territories: Engagement through Cooperation.” N.d. Web. 17 July 2011. <http://www.civil.ge/files/files/SMR-Strategy-en.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Gurgulia, Manana. “The Significance of the Geneva Process: Concerns, Limitations, Possibilities and Prospects.” International Alert: International Engagement in the Georgian-Abkhaz Conflict Resolution Process, May 2010:35–46. Web. 17 July 2011. http://www.international-alert.org/sites/default/files/publications/Georgian-Abkhaz.pdf Google Scholar
Independent Fact-Finding Mission on the Conflict in Georgia (IIFFMCG-CEIIG). Report. Vol II. Sept. 2009. Web. 18 July 2011. <http://www.ceiig.ch/Report.html>..>Google Scholar
International Crisis Group. “Abkhazia: Deepening Dependence.” Europe Report 202 (26 Feb. 2010): 8. Web. 17 July 2011. http://www.crisisgroup.org/~/media/Files/europe/202_abkhazia___deepening_dependence.ashx Google Scholar
International Crisis Group. “South Ossetia: The Burden of Recognition.” Europe Report 205 (7 June 2010): 2–3. Web. 17 July 2011. http://www.crisisgroup.org/~/media/Files/europe/205%20South%20Ossetia%20-%20The%20Burden%20of%20Recognition.ashx Google Scholar
Jgharkava, Zaza. “Abkhazia not Taiwan.” Georgian Daily, 16 May 2008. Web. 17 July 2011. <http://georgiandaily.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2128&Itemid=125>..>Google Scholar
Kvarchelia, Liana. “Georgian Policy on Abkhazia: Strategy or Tactic?” International Alert: The De-Isolation of Abkhazia, April 2011:11–14. Web. 17 July 2011. <http://www.international-alert.org/sites/default/files/publications/1107Abkhazia.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Lynch, Dov. “Why Georgia Matters”. Chaillot Papers 86 (Feb. 2006): 39. Web. 17 July 2011. <http://www.iss.europa.eu/uploads/media/cp086.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Malashenko, Alexeï. “Les repercussions du conflit d'Ossétie du Sud d'aoŭt 2008 sur le Caucase du Nord”. Ordres et désordres au Caucase. Ed. Merlin, Aude and Serrano, Silvia. Bruxelles: Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles, 2010. 77–93. Print.Google Scholar
Malashenko, Alexey, de Waal, Thomas, Yaffa, Joshua, and Lanskoy, Miriam. The North Caucasus: New Threats and Challenges. 19 Nov. 2010. Web. 19 July 2001. <http://www.carnegie.ru/events/?fa=3109&zoom_highlight=north+caucasus>..>Google Scholar
Malashenko, Alexey, and Brill Olcott, Martha. “The North Caucasus Today: The View on the Ground and from Moscow.” 21 Nov. 2008. Web. 19 July 2011. <http://www.carnegie.ru/events/?fa=1223&zoom_highlight=north+caucasus>..>Google Scholar
Medvedev, Dmitry. “Why I Had to Recognise Georgia's Breakaway Regions.” Financial Times, 26 Aug. 2008. Web. 6 August 2012. <http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/9c7ad792-7395-11dd-8a66-0000779fd18c.html#axzz22Vv5vuP3>..>Google Scholar
Mitchell, Lincoln, and Cooley, Alexander. “After the August War: A New Strategy for U.S. Engagement with Georgia.” The Harriman Review 17.3-4 (May 2010). Web. 18 July 2011. <http://www.harrimaninstitute.org/MEDIA/01798.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Öhrberg, Marlene, ed. The Åland Islands Demilitarized Region. Marienhamm: Ålands fredsförening [Åland Peace Society], 1995. Print.Google Scholar
Potier, Tim. Conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh, Abkhazia and South Ossetia: A Legal Appraisal. The Hague: Kluwer Law International. 2001. Print.Google Scholar
Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. “Pressure on Abkhaz Leader Intensifies.” Caucasus Report, 25 Aug. 2010. Web. 18 July 2011. <http://www.rferl.org/content/Pressure_On_Abkhaz_Leader_Intensifies/2137495.html>..>Google Scholar
Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. “Russia Intensifies Focus on Misuse of Property Funds in South Ossetia”. Caucasus Report, 2 Sep. 2010. Web. 18 July 2011. <http://www.rferl.org/content/Russia_Intensifies_Focus_On_Misuse_Of_Funds_In_South_Ossetia/2146472.html>..>Google Scholar
Ramsbotham, Oliver, Woodhouse, Tom, and Miall, Hugh. Contemporary Conflict Resolution: The Prevention, Management and Transformation of Deadly Conflicts. Cambridge: Polity. 2007. Print.Google Scholar
“Russia Will Deal with Abkhazia and South Ossetia ‘The Taiwan Way': Expert.” Regnum, 3 Dec. 2008. Web. 17 July 2011. <http://www.regnum.ru/english/970166.html>..>Google Scholar
Shields, Samantha. “Russian Presence Grows in Abkhazia.” The Wall Street Journal, 14 Dec. 2009. Web. 17 July 2011. <http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126070743647789499.html>..>Google Scholar
Su, Hungdah. “The EU's Taiwan Policy in a New Context.” Issues & Studies 46.1 (March 2010): 1–53. Print.Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council. “Report of the Special Envoy of the Secretary-General on Kosovo's Future Status.” S/2007/168. 26 Mar. 2007. Web. 18 July 2011. <http://www.unosek.org/docref/report-english.pdf>..>Google Scholar
United Nations Secretary-General. The Comprehensive Settlement of the Cyprus Problem, List of Appendices, A: Foundation Agreement, Main Articles, III. 31 Mar. 2004. Web. 18 July 2011. <http://www.bbc.co.uk/greek/Annan_plan_31_march.doc>..>Google Scholar
Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization. N.d. Web. 17 July 2011. <http://www.unpo.org/>..>Google Scholar
Winkler, Sigrid. “Can Trade Make a Sovereign? Taiwan-China-EU Relations in the WTO.” Asia Europe Journal 6.3-4 (Nov. 2008): 467–485. Print.Google Scholar
Winkler, Sigrid. “EU Responses to Taiwan's Applications in the WTO, WHO and UN.” The EU as a Foreign Policy and Security Actor. Ed. Laursen, Finn. Dordrecht: Republic of Letters, 2009. 235–257. Print.Google Scholar
Zverev, Alexei. “The Value of the Tatarstan Experience for Georgia and Abkhazia.” Federal Practice: Exploring Alternatives for Georgia and Abkhazia. Ed. Coppieters, Bruno, Darchiashvili, David, and Akaba, Natella. Brussels: VUB UP, 2000. 91–110. Web. 9 July 2011. http://poli.vub.ac.be/publi/orderbooks/federal/04zverev.pdf Google Scholar