Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T05:35:07.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Between fragmenting and multiplying: Scale-shift processes in Serbian and Croatian antiwar activisms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Bojan Bilić
Bojan Bilić*
Affiliation:
School of Slavonic and East European Studies, University College London, UK, Emails: [email protected], [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper follows the almost contemporaneous emergence of the two primary antiwar initiatives in Belgrade and Zagreb to explore how they acted as hotbeds from which permanent human rights organizations appeared in the newly created nation-states. Drawing mostly upon in-depth interviews with antiwar activists from Serbia and Croatia, I argue that the dominant patterns of protest expansion were different in the two countries. While cooperation and tensions existed within both antiwar groups, the Antiwar Campaign of Croatia acted as a broker, leading toward the multiplication of civic initiatives; on the other hand, the Belgrade Center for Antiwar Action was characterized by ideological, professional, and personal divisions, which caused a rapid fragmentation of antiwar undertakings. This paper outlines the main reasons for such expansion patterns (scale-shift processes) and discusses them in the light of recent theoretical advances in political contention studies.

Keywords

Antiwar Campaign of CroatiaCenter for Antiwar ActionCroatiaSerbiascale shift
Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 41 , Issue 5 , September 2013 , pp. 801 - 814
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted.
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 Association for the Study of Nationalities

References

Aleksov, Bojan. 2001. “Resisting the War in Yugoslavia: Thoughts on Empowerment and Disillusionment.” War Resisters International. http://www.wri-irg.org/es/node/2116.Google Scholar
Bilić, Bojan. 2011. “Recovering (Post-)Yugoslav Anti-War and Pacifist Activism: A Research Agenda.” South Slav Journal 30: 24–56.Google Scholar
Biserko, Sonja, and Bećirević, Edina. 2009. “Negiranje genocida.” Helsinška povelja, September-October 2009, pp. 28–32. http://www.helsinki.org.rs/serbian/doc/povelja%20sep-okt%2009.pdf Google Scholar
Blagojević, Marina. 1998. Ka vidljivoj ženskoj istoriji: ženski pokret u Beogradu 90-ih. Belgrade: Centar za ženske studije.Google Scholar
Bonfiglioli, Chiara. 2008. Belgrade 1978: Remembering the Conference “Drug-ca žena. Žensko pitanje — novi pristup?”. http://www.cunterview.net/index.php/Theory-Papers/Chiara-Bonfiglioli-Comrade-Women.html Google Scholar
Božinović, Neda. 1996. Žensko pitanje u Srbiji u 19. i 20. veku. Belgrade: Women in Black.Google Scholar
“Centar za antiratnu akciju,” 1991. Republika 3, August 25-26, p. 11.Google Scholar
Dević, Ana. 1997. “Anti-War Initiatives and the Un-Making of Civic Identities in the Former Yugoslav Republics.” Journal of Historical Sociology 10: 127–156.Google Scholar
Dragović-Soso, Jasna. 2002. Saviours of the Nation: Serbia's Intellectual Opposition and the Revival of Nationalism. London: Hurst & Company.Google Scholar
Durmanović, Slobodan. 2010. “Cijena nezajažljivih ambicija Nataše Kandić.” Novi Reporter 370. (14 April). http://www.novireporter.com/look/reporter/nr_article.tpl?IdLanguage=11&IdPublication=2&NrIssue=370&NrSection=15&NrArticle=4736 Google Scholar
Dvornik, Srdan. 2009. Akteri bez društva. Zagreb: Fraktura i Heinrich Boell Stiftung.Google Scholar
Fridman, Orli. 2011. “'It Was Like Fighting Our Own People': Anti-War Activism in Serbia during the 1990s.” Nationalities Papers 39: 507–522.Google Scholar
Gagnon, Valère P. Jr. 2004. The Myth of Ethnic War: Serbia and Croatia in the 1990s. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Janković, Vesna, and Mokrović, Nikola, eds. 2011. Antiratna kampanja 1991-2011. Neispričana povij est. Zagreb: Documenta.Google Scholar
Jansen, Stef. 2005. Antinacionalizam: Etnografija otpora u Beogradu i Zagrebu. Belgrade: Biblioteka XX vek.Google Scholar
Kanzleiter, Boris. 2009. “1968 u Jugoslaviji — tema koja čeka istraživanje.” In Društvo u pokretu: novi društveni pokreti u Jugoslaviji od 1968. do danas, edited by Dorđe, Tomix and Petar, Atanackovix, 30–48. Novi Sad: Cenzura.Google Scholar
Kuljić, Todor. 2009. Sociologija generacija. Beograd: Čigoja štampa.Google Scholar
Malavrazić, Đorđe. 2008. Šezdeset osma — lične istorije. 80 svedočenja. Belgrade: RDU RTS.Google Scholar
Mastnak, Tomaž. 1992. “Civil society in Slovenia: from opposition to power.” In The Tragedy of Yugoslavia: The Failure of Democratic Transformation, edited by Seroka Vukašin Pavlović, Jim, 49–66. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug. 1995. “'Initiator’ and ‘Spin-Off’ Movements: Diffusion Processes in Protest Cycle.” In Repertoires and Cycles of Collective Action, edited by Traugott, Mark, 217–239. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sid, and Tilly, Charles. 2004. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Melucci, Alberto. 1992. “Frontier Land: Collective Action between Actors and Systems.” In Studying Collective Action, edited by Eyerman Mario Diani, Ron, 238–258. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Oberschall, Anthony. 1973. Social Conflict and Social Movements. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Oštrić, Zoran. 1992. “Ekološki pokreti u Jugoslaviji: Građa za proučavanje razdoblja 1971-1991.” Socijalna ekologija 1: 83–104.Google Scholar
Pešić, Vesna. 1992. “Jugoslovenska ratna kriza i mirovni pokret.” Sociološki pregled 26: 57–67.Google Scholar
Popov, Nebojša. 1989. Contra fatum: Slučaj profesora Filozofskog fakulteta u Beogradu, 1968-1988. Belgrade: Mladost.Google Scholar
Popović, Dragan. 2011. “Filozofija NVO palanke.” Danas. 6 July. http://www.danas.rs/danasrs/dijalog/filozofija_nvo_palanke.46.html?news_id=218877 Google Scholar
Stubbs, Paul. 2001. “The ZaMir (For Peace) Network: From Transnational Social Movement to Croatian NGO. Hrvatska Znanstvena Bibliografija. http://bib.irb.hr/datoteka/233303.stubbs.pdf Google Scholar
Šipak, Natali. 2001. “Civilne incijative — tko smo?.” In Aktivistkinje: kako ‘opismeniti’ teoriju, edited by Kašić, Biljana et al., 184. Zagreb: Centar za ženske studije.Google Scholar
Šušak, Bojana. 1996. “An Alternative to War.” In The Road to War in Serbia: Trauma and Catharsis, edited by Popov, Nebojša, 479–508. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sid. 1998. Power in Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tokača, Mirsad. 2009. “Dva pisma.” Peščanik. http://pescanik.net/2009/06/dva-pisma Google Scholar
Tomić, Dorđe, and Atanacković, Petar, eds. 2009. Društvo u pokretu: novi društveni pokreti u Jugoslaviji od 1968. do danas. Novi Sad: Cenzura.Google Scholar
Vetta, Theodora. 2009. ‘“Democracy Building’ in Serbia: The NGO Effect.” Southeastern Europe 33: 26–47.Google Scholar
Zajović et al. Žene za mir. 1993. Belgrade: Women in Black.Google Scholar
Zajović et al. Žene za mir. 2007. Belgrade: Women in Black.Google Scholar