Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:48:48.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Advocating for the cause of the “victims of Communism” in the European political space: memory entrepreneurs in interstitial fields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Laure Neumayer
Laure Neumayer*
Affiliation:
Political Science, Université Paris 1 Panthéon Sorbonne, Paris, France
*
*Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The European Parliament (EP) adopted, between 2004 and 2009, a series of resolutions calling for recognition of Communist crimes and commemoration of their victims. This article focuses on an overlooked aspect of anti-Communist activism, the awareness-raising activities carried out by some Central European Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) to perpetuate the cause through networks that enable them to exchange institutional credibility, scientific legitimacy, and policy-oriented knowledge with Institutes of National Memory, parts of academia, and victims associations. Although they use the techniques of expertise and scandalization that are often effective in European institutions, these memory entrepreneurs have largely failed to further their claims in the European Union (EU) after 2009. In line with the turn toward “practice” in EU studies and the increased attention paid to agency in memory politics, this article contends that the conditions of production of their narrative of indictment of Communism accounts for this relative lack of success. Because their demands produced a strong polarization inside the EP while colliding with established Western patterns of remembrance, these MEPs’ reach remains limited to their Conservative peers from the former Eastern bloc. This weak national and ideological representativeness hinders their capacity to impose their vision of the socialist period in the European political space.

Keywords

memory politicsanti-CommunistEuropean ParliamentactivismCentral EuropeInstitutes of National Memory
Type
Special Section: The memory of Communism: actors, norms, institutions
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 45 , Issue 6 , November 2017 , pp. 992 - 1012
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

References

Adler-Nissen, Rebecca. 2016. “Towards a Practice Turn in EU Studies: The Everyday of European Integration.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 54 (1): 87–103.Google Scholar
Balme, Richard, and Chabanet, Didier, eds. 2008. European Governance and Democracy: Power and Protest in the EU. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Beauvallet, Willy, and Michon, Sébastien. 2010. “La socialisation à l'Europe des élus européens – Acquisition et activation de dispositions à l'européanisation.” In La fabrique des “Européens”: processus de socialisation et construction européenne, edited by Robert, Cécile and Michel, Hélène, 197–230. Strasbourg: Presses Universitaires de Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Beauvallet, Willy, and Michon, Sébastien. 2013. “MEPs: Towards a Specialization of European Political Work?” In The Field of Eurocracy. Mapping EU Actors and Professionals, edited by Georgakakis, Didier and Rowell, Jay, 16–34. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Behr, Valentin. 2015. “Genèse et usages d'une politique publique de l'histoire. La ‘politique historique’ en Pologne.” Revue d'Etudes comparatives Est-Ouest 46 (3): 21–48.Google Scholar
Bernhard, Michael, and Kubik, Jan, eds. 2014. Twenty Years after Communism. The Politics of Memory and Commemoration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1976. “Le champ scientifique.” Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 2 (2): 88–104.Google Scholar
Bouwen, Pieter. 2004. “The Logic of Access to the European Parliament: Business Lobbying in the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 42 (3): 473–495.Google Scholar
Büttner, Sebastian, and Delius, Anna. 2015. “World Culture in European Memory Politics? New European Memory Agents between Epistemic Framing and Political Agenda Setting.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 23 (3): 391–404.Google Scholar
Calligaro, Oriane. 2013. Negotiating Europe. EU Promotion of Europeanness since the 1950s. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities. 2007. “Europe for Citizens Programme 2007–2013: Programme Guide.” http://ec.europa.eu/citizenship/pdf/programme_guide_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Courtois, Stéphane, Werth, Nicolas, Panné, Jean-Louis, Bartošek, Karel, Margolin, Jean-Louis, and Paczkowski, Andrzej. 1997. Le livre noir du communisme. Crimes, terreur, répression. Paris: Robert Lafont.Google Scholar
Diaz, Paola, and Gutiérrez, Carolina. 2009. “Les détenus disparus, victimes ou résistantsLes catégories dans la mobilisation de l'Association chilienne des familles de détenus disparus.” In Mobilisations de victimes, edited by Lefranc, Sandrine and Mathieu, Lilian, 129–144. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Michel, Groppio, Bruno, Ingerflom, Claudio, Roland, Lew, Pennetier, Claude, Pudal, Bernard, and Wolikow, Serge, eds. 2000. Le siècle des communismes. Paris: Editions de l'Atelier.Google Scholar
Dvořáková, Vladimíra. 2007. “The Institute of National Memory: Historical Memory as a Political Project.” In Lustration and Consolidation of Democracy and the Rule of Law in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by Dvořáková, Vladimíra and Milardovic, Andelko, 153–168. Zagreb: Zagreb Political Science Research Centre.Google Scholar
European Parliament. 2005. Resolution P6_TA(2005)0180 “The Sixtieth Anniversary of the End of the Second World War in Europe on 8 May 1945.” Google Scholar
European Parliament. 2008. Declaration P6_TA(2008)0439 on “the Proclamation of 23 August as European Day of Remembrance for Victims of Stalinism and Nazism.” Google Scholar
European Parliament. 2009. Resolution P6_TA(2009)0213 “European Conscience and Totalitarianism.” Google Scholar
European Parliament. 2013. Draft report 2013/2129(INI) on “Historical Memory in Culture and Education in the European Union.” Google Scholar
Europe's People Party Group in the European Parliament. 2004. “Resolution Adopted by the XVIth EEP Congress Condemning Totalitarian Communism.” 4–5 February 2004. http://www.epp-ed.eu/Press/peve04/eve01/res-communism_en.asp?Google Scholar
Garcia, Patrick. 2009. “Vers une politique mémorielle européenne? L'évolution du statut de l'histoire dans le discours du Conseil de l'Europe.” http://www.ihtp.cnrs.fr/sites/ihtp/IMG/pdf_Garcia_Vers_une_politique_memorielle_de_l_Europe_2009_.pdf.Google Scholar
Gensburger, Sarah, and Lavabre, Marie-Claire, eds. 2012. “D'une ‘mémoire européenne’ à l'européanisation de la mémoire.” Politique européenne 37: 9–17.Google Scholar
Knowlton, James, and Cates, Truette. 1993. Forever in the Shadow of Hitler? The Dispute about the German Understanding of History. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Kopeček, Michal, ed. 2008. History in the Making: Historical Revisionism in Central Europe since 1989. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
Kübler, Elisabeth. 2010. “Holocaust Remembrance in the Council of Europe: Deplorable Victims and Evil Ideologies without Perpetrators.” Jewish Political Studies Review 23 (12). http://jcpa.org/article/holocaust-remembrance-in-the-council-of-europe-deplorable-victims-and-evil-ideologies-without-perpetrators/.Google Scholar
Laignel-Lavastine, Alexandra. 1999. “Fascisme et communisme en Roumanie: enjeux et usages d'une comparaison.” In Stalinisme et nazisme: histoire et mémoire comparée, edited by Rousso, Henry, 201–247. Brussels: Editions Complexe.Google Scholar
Larat, Fabrice. 2005. “Present-ing the Past: Political Narratives on European History and the Justification of European Integration.” German Law Review 6 (2): 263–278.Google Scholar
Leggewie, Claus. 2008. “A Tour of the Battleground: The Seven Circles of Pan-European Memory.” Social Research 75: 217–234.Google Scholar
Littoz-Monnet, Annabelle. 2012. “The EU Politics of Remembrance: Can Europeans Remember Together?” West European Politics 35 (5): 1182–1202.Google Scholar
Littoz-Monnet, Annabelle. 2013. “Explaining Policy Conflict Across Institutional Venues: European Union-level Struggles over the Memory of the Holocaust.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 51 (3): 489–504.Google Scholar
Mälksoo, Maria. 2014. “Criminalizing Communism: Transnational Mnemopolitics in Europe.” International Political Sociology 8: 82–99.Google Scholar
Mark, James. 2010. The Unfinished Revolution: Making Sense of the Communist Past in Central-Eastern Europe. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Medvetz, Thomas. 2012. Think Tanks in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mink, Georges. 2017. “Is there a New Institutional Response to the Crimes of Communism? National Memory Agencies in Post-communist Countries: The Polish Case (1998–2014), with References to East Germany.” Nationalities Papers 45 (6): 1013–1027. doi:10.1080/00905992.2017.1360853.Google Scholar
Nedergaard, Peter, and Dagnis Jensen, Mads. 2014. “The Anatomy of Intergroups – Network Governance in the Political Engine Room of the European Parliament.” Policy Studies 35 (2): 192–209.Google Scholar
Neumayer, Laure. 2015. “Integrating the Central European Past into a Common Narrative: The Mobilizations Around the ‘Crimes of Communism’ in the European Parliament.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 23 (3): 344–363.Google Scholar
Offerlé, Michel. 1998. Sociologie des groupes d'intérěts. Paris: Montchrestien.Google Scholar
Olick, Jeffrey. 2007. The Politics of Regret, on Collective Memory and Historical Responsibility. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
PACE. 1996. Resolution 1096 on “Measures to Dismantle the Heritage of Former Communist Totalitarian Systems.” Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
PACE. 2006. Resolution 1481 on “The Need for International Condemnation of Crimes of Totalitarian Communist Regimes.” Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
PACE. 2010. Resolution 1723 on “Commemorating the Victims of the Great Famine (Holodomor) in the Former USSR.” Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Perchoc, Philippe. 2014. “Un passé, deux Assemblées. L'Assemblée parlementaire du Conseil de l'Europe, le Parlement européen et l'interprétation de l'histoire (2004–2009).” Revue d'Etudes comparatives Est-Ouest 45 (3–4): 205–235.Google Scholar
Platform of European Memory and Conscience. 2011. Agreement Establishing the Platform of European Memory and Conscience. Prague. https://www.memoryandconscience.eu/official-documents-of-the-european-parliament/statute-and-agreement/.Google Scholar
Platform of European Memory and Conscience. 2013a. International Travelling Exhibition Catalogue. Prague: Platform of European Memory and Conscience.Google Scholar
Platform of European Memory and Conscience. 2013b. Lest We Forget: Memory of Totalitarianism in Europe. A Reader for Older Secondary School Students Anywhere in Europe. Prague: Platform of European Memory and Conscience.Google Scholar
Plessow, Oliver. 2015. “The Interplay of the European Commission, Researcher and Educator Networks and Transnational Agencies in the Promotion of a Pan-European Holocaust Memory.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 23 (3): 378–390.Google Scholar
Pollak, Michael. 1993. Une identité blessée. Etudes de sociologie et d'histoire. Paris: Métailié.Google Scholar
Declaration, Prague. 2008. “Declaration on European Conscience and Communism.” http://www.praguedeclaration.eu/.Google Scholar
Rousso, Henry, ed. 2004. Stalinism and Nazism: History and Memory Compared. Lincoln: Nebraska University Press.Google Scholar
Sierp, Aline, and Wüstenberg, Jenny, eds. 2015. “Linking the Local and the Transnational: Rethinking Memory Politics in Europe.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 23 (3): 321–329.Google Scholar
Welsh, Helga. 2015. “Beyond the National: Pathways of Diffusion.” In Post-Communist Transitional Justice. Lessons from Twenty-Five Years of Experience, edited by Stan, Lavinia and Nadelsky, Nadya, 167–187. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zombory, Máté. 2017. “The Birth of the Memory of Communism: Memorial Museums in Europe.” Nationalities Papers 45 (6): 1028–1046. doi:10.1080/00905992.2017.1339680.Google Scholar