Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T21:19:50.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Regimes of Engagement and Protest in Russia: A Reply to Arnold, Sidorkina, and Shevchenko

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2020

Mischa Gabowitsch Open the ORCID record for Mischa Gabowitsch [Opens in a new window]
Mischa Gabowitsch*
Affiliation:
Einstein Forum, Potsdam, Germany
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Symposium
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 48 , Special Issue 2: Special Issue on National Cultural Autonomy in Diverse Political Communities: Practices, Challenges, and Perspectives , March 2020 , pp. 414 - 418
Copyright
© Association for the Study of Nationalities 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bikbov, Alexander. Forthcoming. “Late Socialist Personhood as an Unintended Result of Governmental Reforms.” In The Many Faces of Late Socialism. The Individual in the Eastern Bloc, 1953–1988, edited by Lehmann, Maike.Google Scholar
Blok, Anders. 2015. “Attachments to the Common-Place: Pragmatic Sociology and the Aesthetic Cosmopolitics of Eco-House Design in Kyoto, Japan.” European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 2 (2): 122–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boltanski, Luc. 1987. The Making of a Class: Cadres in French Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boltanski, Luc, and Chiapello, Éve. 1999. Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Boltanski, Luc, and Chiapello, Eve. 2005. The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boltanski, Luc, and Thévenot, Laurent. 2006. On Justification. Economies of Worth. Translated by Catherine, Porter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Breviglieri, Marc, Diaz, Paola, and Nardacchione, Gabriel. 2017. “L’expérience latino-américaine de la sociologie pragmatique francophone. Élargissement d’un horizon d’analyse ? Introduction du Dossier.” SociologieS. http://journals.openedition.org/sociologies/6174. (Accessed March 14, 2019.)Google Scholar
Centemeri, Laura. 2015. “Reframing Problems of Incommensurability in Environmental Conflicts Through Pragmatic Sociology: From Value Pluralism to the Plurality of Modes of Engagement with the Environment.” Environmental Values 24 (3): 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centemeri, Laura. 2017. “From Public Participation to Place-Based Resistance: Environmental Critique and Modes of Valuation in the Struggles against the Expansion of the Malpensa Airport.” Historical Social Research 42 (3): 97–122.Google Scholar
Diaz-Bone, Rainer. 2018. “Economics of Convention and Its Perspective on Knowledge and Institutions.” In Knowledge and Institutions, edited by Glückler, Johannes, Suddaby, Roy, and Lenz, Regina, 69–88. Cham: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eranti, Veikko. 2017. “Re-Visiting NIMBY: From Conflicting Interests to Conflicting Valuations.” The Sociological Review 65 (2): 285–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eranti, Veikko. 2018. “Engagements, Grammars, and the Public: From the Liberal Grammar to Individual Interests.” European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 5 (1–2): 42–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabowitsch, Mischa. 2016. Protest in Putin’s Russia. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Lamont, Michèle, and Thévenot, Laurent, eds. 2000. Rethinking Comparative Cultural Sociology: Repertoires of Evaluation in France and the United States. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1995. “Moderniser ou écologiser? : A la recherche de la ‘septième’ cité.” Ecologie & politique : sciences, cultures, sociétés 4 (13): 5–27.Google Scholar
Lebedev, Anna. 2017. “La protestation postsoviétique et les grammaires de l’action collective.” Revue d’études comparatives Est-Ouest 48: 95–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhtakallio, Eeva. “Group Formation, Styles, and Grammars of Commonality in Local Activism.” The British Journal of Sociology. Published online ahead of print November 8, 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidorkina, Maria. 2015. “‘Shining a Light’ on Us and Them: Public-Making in Ordinary Russia.” Ab Imperio 2: 209–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidorkina, Maria. 2016. “Exercises in Collectivity: Reassembling the Civic on the Russian Periphery.” Paper Presented at the Conference “Russian Politics Beyond the Kremlin,” Yale University, November 4.Google Scholar
Thévenot, Laurent. 2014. “Voicing Concern and Difference: From Public Spaces to Common-Places.” European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 1 (1): 7–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thévenot, Laurent. 2016. “From Social Coding to Economics of Convention: A Thirty-Year Perspective on the Analysis of Qualification and Quantification Investments.” Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung 41 (2): 96–117.Google Scholar
Thévenot, Laurent. 2017. “« Des Liens du Proche aux Lieux du Public ». Retour sur un programme franco-russe pionnier.” Revue detudes comparatives Est-Ouest 48 (3): 7–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thévenot, Laurent. “How Does Politics Take Closeness into Account? Returns from Russia.” International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society. Published online ahead of print June 10, 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-019-9322-5.Google Scholar
Thévenot, Laurent, Rousselet, Kathy, and Daucé, Françoise, eds. 2017. “Critiquer et agir en Russie. Numéro spécial thématique.” Special issue, Revue d`études comparatives Est-Ouest 48 (3–4).Google Scholar