Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T03:46:28.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Languages, politics and field theory — the question of the autonomy of small literatures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Clémence Scalbert-Yücel
Clémence Scalbert-Yücel*
Affiliation:
Institute of Arab and Islamic Studies, University of Exeter, United Kingdom
*
∗Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, Benedict Anderson stressed the role that literature, and particularly the development of the novel, actually played in building a nation as an “imagined community.” Others have emphasized how building a national literature has often gone hand in hand with the creation of a national identity (e.g. Thiesse; Jusdanis). All have underlined the strong relationship between nationalism and literature: literature is a concrete tool that builds the nation as a community; literature also serves to build and spread a national identity.

Type
Special Section: The Autonomy of Minority Literature
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , May 2012 , pp. 315 - 320
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso, 1983. Print.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. “Rossett's Obsession by Ramon Saizarbitoria: On the Seduction of Minority Literary Fields.” Nationalities Papers 40.3 (2012): 321–340. Print.Google Scholar
Apalategui, Ur. “Territoire linguistique et littéraire: adéquations et décalages.” Lengas 56 (2004): 17–46. Print.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. “Le champ littéraire.” Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 89 (1991): 4–46. Print.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. “Existe-t-il une littérature beige? Limites d'un champ et frontières politiques.” Etudes de lettres 4 (1985): 3–6. Print.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Palo Alto: Stanford U P, 1996. Print.Google Scholar
Brod, Max, ed. The Diaries of Franz Kafka 1910–1913. London: Secker & Warburg, 1948. Print.Google Scholar
Casanova, Pascale. The World Republic of Letters. Cambridge, MA: Harvard U P, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Dawson, James. “The Ethnic and Non-ethnic Politics of Everyday Life in Bulgaria's Southern Borderland.” Nationalities Papers 40.3 (2012): 473–489. Print.Google Scholar
Jusdanis, Gregory. Belated Modernity and Aesthetic Culture: Inventing National Literature. Minneapolis, Oxford: University of Minnesota Press, 1991. Print.Google Scholar
Lahire, Bernard. “Champ, hors-champ, contrechamp”. Le travail sociologique de Pierre Bourdieu. Ed. Lahire, Bernard. Paris: La découverte, 1999. 23–57. Print.Google Scholar
Lahire, Bernard. La condition littéraire. La double vie des écrivains. Paris: La découverte, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Lahire, Bernard. The Plural Actor. Cambridge: Polity, 2011. Print.Google Scholar
Lahire, Bernard. “Specificity and Independence of the Literary Game: The Theory of the Literary Field and the Unwitting Universalization of the French Case.” Nationalities Papers 40.3 (2012): 411–429. Print.Google Scholar
Lévy, Clara. ‘The Controversial Question of Trench Jewish Literature'.” Nationalities Papers 40.3 (2012): 395–409. Print.Google Scholar
Pouessel, Stéphanie. “Writing as Resistance: Berber Literature and the Challenges Surrounding the Emergence of a Berber Literary Field in Morocco.” Nationalities Papers 40.3 (2012): 373–393. Print.Google Scholar
Riaux, Gilles. “Literatures at the Intersections of National Territories: Iranian-Azerbaijani Ethnic Entrepreneurs in a Transnational Historical Space.” Nationalities Papers 40.3 (2012): 341–356. Print.Google Scholar
Saint-Jacques, Denis, and Viala, Alain. “À propos du champ littéraire: histoire, géographie, histoire littéraire.” Le travail sociologique de Pierre Bourdieu. Ed. Lahire, Bernard. Paris: La Découverte, 1999. 59–74. Print.Google Scholar
Scalbert-Yücel, Clémence. “Emergence and Equivocal Autonomization of a Kurdish Literary Field in Turkey.” Nationalities Papers 40.3 (2012): 315–320. Print.Google Scholar
Thiesse, Anne-Marie. La creation des identités nationales en Europe XVIIIème–XXème siècles. Paris: Le Seuil, 1999. Print.Google Scholar
Thiesse, Anne-Marie. “National Identities: A Transnational Paradigm.” Revisiting Nationalism: Theories and Processes. Ed. Dieckhoff, Alain and Jaffrelot, Christophe. London: Palgrave MacMillan, 2006. 122–143. Print.Google Scholar
Yashin, Mehmet. “Introducing Step-mothertongue.” Step-mothertongue: From Nationalism to Multiculturalism; Literature of Cyprus, Greece and Turkey. Ed. Yashin, Mehmet. London: Middlesex U P, 2000. 1–24. Print.Google Scholar