Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T06:10:46.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Heidegger and post-colonial fascism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Jeff Love  and
Michael Meng
Jeff Love
Affiliation:
Department of Languages, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA
Michael Meng*
Affiliation:
Department of History, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA
*
∗Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Alexander Dugin is considered a fringe figure in contemporary Russia. Yet, his writings exert considerable influence and develop a virulent nationalism that exploits the vocabulary of post-colonial resistance in an unaccustomed way. Dugin should not be ignored, and this article gives a brief account of Dugin's peculiar brand of post-colonial thinking by reference to its central source: Martin Heidegger. Specifically, the article examines how Dugin adapts the anti-metaphysical thinking of Heidegger's most radical work of the 1930s – a thinking that seeks to renew Western thought in an other beginning – to the context of modern Russia as it tries to free itself from Western (American) domination. Dugin aims at nothing less than the creation of a new Russian identity and destiny that will not only save Russia but also, in a nod to Heidegger, renew the Western tradition itself from the “outside.” If Dugin's political project is ambitious, so is his interpretation of Heidegger which attempts to bring out the full radicality of Heidegger's thinking, both as philosophy and as politics.

Keywords

DuginfascismHeideggerpost-colonialism
Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , March 2017 , pp. 307 - 320
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appiah, Kwame Anthony. 2007. Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. The Political Ontology of Martin Heidegger. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bruck, Arthur Moeller van den. 1906. Sämtliche Werke Fedor Michailovic Dostoevskij. Munich: Piper.Google Scholar
Bruck, Arthur Moeller van den. 1923. Das Dritte Reich. Berlin: Der Ring.Google Scholar
Bruck, Arthur Moeller van den. [1923] 2012. The Third Empire. London: Arktos Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1989. Of Spirit: Heidegger and the Question. Translated by Geoffrey Bennington and Rachel Bowlby. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dostoevsky, Fyodor. 1991. The Brothers Karamazov. Translated by Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Dugin, Alexander. 2012. The Fourth Political Theory. Translated by Mark Sleboda and Michael Millerman. London: Arktos Media.Google Scholar
Dugin, Alexander. 2014a. Poslednii Bog. Moscow: Akademicheskii Proekt.Google Scholar
Dugin, Alexander. 2014b. Martin Heidegger: The Philosophy of Another Beginning. Translated by Nina Kouprianova. Arlington, VA: Radix.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and Time. Translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1991. Nietzsche. 2 vols. Translated by David Farrell Krell. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1994. Basic Questions of Philosophy: Selected Problems of Logic. Translated by Andre Schuwer and Richard Rojcewicz. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1997. Besinnung. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1998a. “Plato's Doctrine of Truth.” In Pathmarks, edited by McNeill, William, 155–182. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1998b. Die Geschichte des Seyns. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 2004. What Is Called Thinking? Translated by J. Glenn Gray. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 2010. Being and Truth. Translated by Gregory Fried and Richard Polt. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 2012. Contributions to Philosophy (On the Event). Translated by Richard Rojcewicz and Daniela Vallega-Neu. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 2014a. Überlegungen II–IV (Schwarze Hefte 1931–1938). Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Kostermann.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 2014b. Überlegungen VII–XI (Schwarze Hefte 1938/1939). Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 2014c. Überlegungen XII–XV (Schwarze Hefte). Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 2014d. Introduction to Metaphysics. 2nd ed. Translated by Gregory Fried and Richard Polt. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 2015. Anmerkungen I–V (Schwarze Hefte 1942–1948). Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Krell, David Farrell. 2015. Ecstasy, Catastrophe: Heidegger from Being and Time to the Black Notebooks. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Laruelle, Marlene. 2012. Russian Eurasionism: An Ideology of Empire. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Malpas, Jeff. 2016. “On the Philosophical Reading of Heidegger: Situating the Black Notebooks.” In Reading Heidegger's Black Notebooks 1931–1941, edited by Farin, Ingo and Malpas, Jeff, 3–22. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mosse, George. 2000. The Fascist Revolution: Toward a General Theory of Fascism. New York: Howard Fertig.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1994. On the Genealogy of Morality. Translated by Carol Diethe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paxton, Robert O. 2005. The Anatomy of Fascism. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 2007. The Concept of the Political. Expanded ed. Translated by George Schwab. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar