Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T08:24:00.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cross-Border Cooperation and Transformation of Regional Identities in the Ukrainian–Russian Borderlands: Towards a Euroregion “Slobozhanshchyna”? Part 2*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Tatiana Zhurzhenko
Tatiana Zhurzhenko*
Affiliation:
School of Philosophy, V. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Ukraine; Institute for East European History, University of Vienna, Austria. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Let us now have a closer look at the Kharkiv-Belgorod (potential) cross-border region as a case study of Ukrainian-Russian cross-border cooperation. Not only is the case of Kharkiv-Belgorod special because of the historical and cultural specificity of the region, which provides additional symbolic resources for its “reinvention” as a borderland (this will be discussed in the last section of the paper); it also represents an interesting combination of (remaining) cultural closeness and (growing) social and economic differences between the two bordering territories; significantly, these two administrative units became the initiators of the cross-border cooperation between Ukraine and Russia and see themselves as pioneers whose experience can be used for the other parts of the border.

Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , June 2004 , pp. 497 - 514
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 Association for the Study of Nationalities of Eastern Europe 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. According to statistical data cited during the parliamentary hearings on Russian-Ukrainian cooperation in the Russian Duma in 1999, almost 40% of families in the Belgorod region have relatives in Ukraine. Around 45,000 per year move from Ukraine to the Belgorod region, and about 20,000 leave the region for Ukraine. Around 30,000 people actually live in Ukraine but are registered in the Belgorod region in order not to lose their Russian pensions. “Parlamentskie slushania. Rossiysko-ukrainskoe sotrudnichestvo: dinamika razvitia posle vstuplenia v silu Dogovora o druzhbe, sotrudnichestve i partnerstve mezhdu RF i Ukrainoy,” Analiticheskiy vestnik , No. 7 (119), 2000, pp. 34–36.Google Scholar

2. Vladimir Kolossov and Aleksey Kiryukhin, “Prigranichnoe sotrudnichestvo v rossiysko-ukrainskikh otnosheniakh,” Politia, No. 1 (19), 2001, pp. 141–165. Vladimir Kolossov and Olga Vendina, “Rossiysko-ukrainskaia granitsa: sotsialnye gradienty, identichnosti i migratsionnye potoki (na primere Belgorodskoy i Kharkovskoy oblastey),” Migratsia i pogranichnyi rezhim: Belarus, Moldova, Rossia i Ukraina (Kiev: NIPMB, 2002), pp. 21–46.Google Scholar

3. Kolossov and Vendina, “Rossiysko-ukrainskaia granitsa,” p. 39.Google Scholar

4. “Economicheskaia missia ‘Kharkov-Belgorod,’” Vestnik torgovo-promyshlennoy palaty. Sovmestnyi vypusk Kharkovskoy I Belgorodskoy torgovo-promyshlennykh palat , No. 10, 2001, pp. 12–13.Google Scholar

5. Aleksey Kiryukhin, “Sotrudnichestvo territoriy rossiysko-ukrainskogo pogranichia v oblasti okhrany okruzhaushchey sredy,” in Region: Problemyi i perspektivy. Spetsvypusk: Ekologia Severskogo Dontsa (Kharkov, 2001), p. 64.Google Scholar

6. LIFE (The Financial Instrument for the Environment) was launched in 1992 and is an EU environment policy program. INTERREG-III is a community initiative which aims to stimulate interregional cooperation in the EU between 2000–2006.Google Scholar

7. Kiryukhin, p. 64.Google Scholar

8. “Chernila vysokhli—teper za rabotu,” Vecherniy Kharkov , 22 June 2002.Google Scholar

9. Artur Golikov and Pavel Chernomaz, “Evroregion ‘Slobozhanshchyna’ kak forma transgranichnogo sotrudnichestva sopredelnykh oblastey Ukrainy I Rossii,” Region, No. 4, 1997, pp. 52–54.Google Scholar

10. Aleksey Kiryukhin, Pavel Chernomaz and Natalia Korsunova, “Evroregion ‘Slobozhanshchyna’ kak model ustoichivogo razvitia prigranichnykh territoriy,” Biznes-inform , Nos 3–4, 2002, pp. 62–63.Google Scholar

11. Yuri Klochkov and Aleksey Kiryukhin, “Prigranichny polyus rosta: perspektivy ozhivle-nia torgovli i strudnichestva,” Vestnik torgovo-promyshlennoy palaty. Sovmestnyi vypusk Kharkovskoy I Belgorodskoy torgovo-promyshlennykh palat , No. 10, 2001, p. 16.Google Scholar

12. “Kharkov + Belgorod = Evroregion?” (interview with Aleksey Kiryukhin), Komsomol-skaia Pravda v Ukraine, 25 October 2002, p. 14; Aleksey Kiryukhin, “Territorialnaia struktura Evroregiona ‘Slobozhanshchyna,’” Biznes-inform, No. 6, 2000, pp. 48–50.Google Scholar

13. Vestnik torgovo-promyshlennoy palaty. Sovmestnyi vypusk Kharkovskoy I Belgorodskoy torgovo-promyshlennykh palat , No. 10, 2001.Google Scholar

14. Cf. V. Kravchenko's commentary to: Dmytro Bahaliy, Istoria Slobidskoi Ukrainy (Kharkiv: Delta, 1993), p. 235.Google Scholar

15. Serhii Plokhy, “Historical Debates and Territorial Claims. Cossack Mythology in the Russian-Ukrainian Border Dispute,” in Frederick Starr, ed., Legacy of History in Russia and the New States of Eurasia (Armonk, NY and London: M. E. Sharpe, 1994).Google Scholar

16. Andreas Kappeler, “Die Kosaken-Aera als zentraler Baustein der Konstruktion einer national-ukrainischen Geschichte: Das Beispiel der Zeitschrift Kievskaja Starina 1882–1891,” in Andreas Kappeler, Der schwierige Weg zur Nation. Beitrage zur neueren Geschichte der Ukraine (Wien—Koeln—Weimar: Boehlau Verlag, 2003), pp. 123–135.Google Scholar

17. A. Slyusarskyi, Slobidska Ukraina. Istorychnyi narys XVII-XVIII stolitt (Kharkiv: Kharkivske knuzhkovo-gazetne vyrobnytstvo, 1954).Google Scholar

18. Dmytro Bahaliy, Istoria Slobidskoi Ukrainy (Kharkiv: Delta, 1993), p. 236Google Scholar

19. Volodymyr Kravchenko, “Slavnykh pradidiv velykykh …,” in Dmytro Bahaliy, Istoria Slobidskoi Ukrainy (Kharkiv: Delta, 1993), p. 8Google Scholar

20. Kravchenko, “Slavnykh pradidiv velykykh,” p. 6.Google Scholar

21. Vladimir Grinev (Volodymyr Hryniov), “Sotsialno-ekonomicheskie i kulturno-istorich-eskie aspekty regionalnoi politiki v Ukraine,” Region, Nos 2–3, 1998, p. 13.Google Scholar

22. V. Sadkina, Geografia rodnogo kraia (Kharkiv: Skorpion, 2000), pp. 65–66.Google Scholar

23. Konstantin Kevorkian, Pervaia stolitsa. Rasskazy o gorode. Publitsistika. Ocherki (Kharkiv: Folio, 2002).Google Scholar

24. Kevorkian, p. 186.Google Scholar

25. “Programa ‘Kharkivshchyna—2010,’” <http://oblrada.kharkov.ua/2010.htm>..>Google Scholar

26. Ibid.Google Scholar

27. Cf. the Council of Europe website, www.coe.int Google Scholar

28. Golikov and Chernomaz, “Evroregion ‘Slobozhanshchyna’ kak forma transgranichnogo sotrudnichestva sopredelnykh oblastey Ukrainy I Rossii,” pp. 52–54.Google Scholar

29. “New Neighborhood—New Association. Ukraine and the European Union at the beginning of the 21st century,” Policy paper series, “On the Future of Europe” (Warsaw: Stefan Batory Foundation, March 2002), Policy Paper no. 6, p. 14.Google Scholar

30. Lyudmila Chizhikova, Russko-ukrainskoe pogranichie. Istoria i sudby traditsionno-by***tovoy kultury (XIX-XX veka) (Moscow: Nauka, 1988).Google Scholar

31. Boldetskaia (Filipova) Olga, “Osobennosti pogranichnogo regiona i ikh vlianie na etnonatsionalnuyu identichnost (po materialam sotsiologicheskikh issledovaniy v Kharkovskoy I Belgorodskoy oblastiakh,” Region, No. 3, 1997, pp. 53–58.Google Scholar

32. Hakli, Jouni, “Cross-Border Identities in the New Europe: Ghost of the Past or Sign-Post to the Next Millennium?” paper presented at IGU Political Geography Conference, Maynooth Ireland, August 1998, <http://www.may.ie/staff/dpringle/iqu/hakli.pdf>..>Google Scholar