Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:44:26.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Between Minority Rights and Civil Liberties: Russia's Discourse Over “Nationality” Registration and the Internal Passport*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Sven Gunnar Simonsen
Sven Gunnar Simonsen*
Affiliation:
International Peace Research Institute, Oslo (PRIO) Fuglehauggata 11, N-0260 Oslo, Norway, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The registration of citizens' ethnicity (“nationality”) in official documents was commonplace and often obligatory in the Soviet Union, and the practice continued in the Russian Federation through the 1990s. In 1997, the Yeltsin government replaced the Soviet internal passport with a new one not featuring the “nationality” entry. The new document was met with an instant wave of protests from Russia's regions, above all the ethnically defined federal subjects. They objected to the removal of the “nationality” entry, and also because the passport (unlike the Soviet one) did not have a section in the federal subject's own language(s) besides Russian, and did not display the emblems of the region in question.

Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , June 2005 , pp. 211 - 229
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 Association for the Study of Nationalities of Eastern Europe 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

* The author would like to thank Dominique Arel, Pavel Baev, Helge Blakkisrud, Tor Bukkvoll, Pål Kolstø, and two anonymous referees for useful comments on earlier versions of this article. The article has been written as part of the project Recreating National Identities in the Post-Soviet States , located at the Watson Institute, Brown University. The author is grateful for the funding and support provided by the project and its leaders, Dominique Arel and David Kertzer. Rafik Abdrakhmanov, Svetlana Akkieva, Ildar Gabdrafikov, Nail Mukharyamov, Vladimir Mukomel and Valeriy Tishkov provided kind assistance in the collection of source materials.Google Scholar

1. For a study of the passport regime in Tsarist and Soviet Russia, with an emphasis on the restrictions of movement and residence, see Matthews, Mervyn, The Passport Society. Controlling Movement in Russia and the USSR (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1993).Google Scholar

2. For an analysis of the early reactions to the 1997 passport, see Simonsen, Sven Gunnar, “Inheriting the Soviet Policy Toolbox. Russia's Dilemma Over Ascriptive Nationality,” Europe–Asia Studies, Vol. 51, No. 6, 1999, pp. 1069–1087.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

3. Konstitutsiya rossiyskoy federatsii , Izdatelstvo “OS-89”, 1997, p. 10.Google Scholar

4. Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy , 1997. Pod redaktsiey i so vstupitelnoy statey akademika B. N. Topornina. Yurist, Moskva, 1997, pp. 221–222. The authors continue by stating that the determination of national affiliation “takes place on the basis of self identification, i.e. considering a subjective factor, decided by the individual himself.” However, the subjective perspective was still not operational in relation to the registration of nationality outside the context of the census.Google Scholar

5. Author's interview with Vyacheslav Igrunov. Moscow, February 2001.Google Scholar

6. Author's interview with Valeriy Tishkov. Moscow, November 2000. See also V. A. Tishkov, Etnologiya i politika (Moskva: Nauka, 2001), pp. 93–97.Google Scholar

7. It is difficult to get a detailed overview of this decision-making process from outside. One could speculate that some of those who crafted the policy expected it to open up for assimilation processes—and saw that as desirable. It is a fact that in Moscow politics at the time, advocates of liberal democracy and illiberal assimilation found themselves in untypical agreement when approving of the abolition of the nationality entry. See Sven Gunnar Simonsen, “Inheriting the Soviet Policy Toolbox,” pp. 1079–1080.Google Scholar

8. RFE/RL Newsline , 11 October 1997.Google Scholar

9. Rossiyskie vesti , 19 November 1997.Google Scholar

10. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/Treaties/Html/157.htm.Google Scholar

11. Abdulatipov, Ramazan, “Direct Speech. Multilingual Russia Is Already Structured That Way,” Rossiyskaya Gazeta , 26 January 1999. In FBIS-SOV-99-031.Google Scholar

12. “The myth about a moral crisis among young people has no real foundation,” Nezavisimaya gazeta, 11 February 1998; Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press, Vol. 50, No. 7, p. 10. The nation-wide poll was conducted in 1997 by the Russian Independent Institute for Social and Nationality-Related Problems, and commissioned by the Friedrich Ebert Foundation.Google Scholar

13. Dzadziev, A., “Severnaya Ossetiya,” Byulleten, N5, No. 16, 1996. Set etnologicheskogo monitoringa i rannego preduprezhdeniya konfliktov, p. 16.Google Scholar

14. Poll conducted in January 1999, among 507 respondents in different regions of Kabardino-Balkariya. Unpublished poll transcript provided by Professor Svetlana Akkieva, Nalchik.Google Scholar

15. Grigorenko, Galina, “Gde prizemlitsya dvuglavyy orel?” Vremya i dengi , No. 121, 18 October 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16. “Postanovlenie Gosudarstvennogo Soveta Respubliki Tatarstana. O pasporte grazhdanina Rossiyskoy Federatsii,” Kazan 13 November 1997. Respublika Tatarstan , 15 November 1997.Google Scholar

17. Shaymiev, M. Sh., “Situatsiya s vvedeniem novykh rossiyskikh pasportov ochen khochetsya nazvat nedorazumennem”, Respublika Tatarstan , 25 October 1997.Google Scholar

18. Kisriev, Enver and Gabdrafikov, Ildar, “Natsionalnyy pasport ili natsionalnost v pasporte,” Nezavisimaya gazeta , 16 December 1997.Google Scholar

19. Poryvayeva, Aleksandra, “Bashkiria insists on its right to its own language,” Kommersant-Daily , 2 December 1997. Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press, Vol. XLIX, No. 48, 1997, p. 17, p. 31.Google Scholar

20. “Zakonodatelnoe Sobranie Omskoy Oblasti. Postanovlenie, ot 15 janvarya 1998 g., no. 20. O vklyuchenii grafy “natsionalnost” v novyy pasport grazhdanina Rossiyskoy Federatsii”. It would have been interesting to conduct a more detailed survey of the different regions' reactions, not least to determine how the issue played out in the non-ethnically defined federal subjects (such as Omsk oblast) in comparison to the ethnically defined ones. Unfortunately, the material available does not allow for such an extension of this study.Google Scholar

21. “Pravitelstvo Respubliki Dagestan,” Postanovlenie, 3 iyunya 1998, No. 111. Ob utverzhdenii polozheniya o vkladyshe k pasportu grazhdanina Rossiyskoy Federatsii.Google Scholar

22. Sovet Respubliki Parlamenta Kabardino-Balkarskoy Respubliki. Postanovlenie ot 21 oktabrya 1998 g. N132-P-SR. Ob obrashchenie ministra vnutrennykh del Kabardino-Balkarskoy Respubliki Shogenova Kh. A. k predsedatelyu soveta respubliki parlamenta Kabardino-Balkarskoy respubliki Nakhushevu Z. A.Google Scholar

23. Ukaz Prezidenta Respubliki Adygeya. O vnesenii izmeneniy i dopolneniy v ukaz prezidenta Respubliki Adygeya ot 6 iyulya 1998 goda N 81 “O vkladyshe v pasport grazhdanina Rossiyskoy Federatsii.”Google Scholar

24. Khannanova, Gulchachak, “Bashkiram ne kvataet pyatogo punkta,” Kommersant, 9 September 2000. Specifically, the bone of contention was the Russian government's resolution No. 828 signed on 8 July 1997, “On approving the order about the Russian Federation citizen's passport, its form and description, corresponded to the Russian Constitution.”Google Scholar

25. “Zapros O sootvetstvii Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii postanovleniya Pravitelstvo Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 8 yulya 1997 goda No. 828 “Ob utverzhdenii Polozheniya o pasporte grazhdanina Rossiyskoy Federatsii, obraztsa blanka i opisaniya pasporta grazdanina Rossiyskoy Federatsii.”Google Scholar

26. Figures from the 1989 census.Google Scholar

27. Akkieva, Svetlana, “Kabardino-Balkariya,” Byulleten, N5, 16, dekabr 1996. Set etnologicheskogo monitoringa i rannego preduprezhdeniya konfliktov, pp. 19–20.Google Scholar

28. Rogers Brubaker pioneered the concept of “nationalizing states,” describing states that are “ethnically heterogenous yet conceived as nation-states,” with dominant elites promoting the language, culture, demographic position, economic flourishing, or political hegemony of the nominally state-bearing nation. Rogers Brubaker, Nationalism Reframed. Nationhood and the national question in the New Europe (Cambridge University Press, 1997), p. 57.Google Scholar

29. Akopov, Pyotr, “Ustinov's ultimatum,” Izvestia, 2 June 2000. Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press. Vol. 52, No. 22, p. 11.Google Scholar

30. Figure cited in paper presented by Venaliy Amelin at the conference “Federalism on the eve of the XXI century: Russian and international dimensions,” Kazan, 9–10 February 2001, and in Amelin, Venaliy, “Problemy ravnogo dostupa k vlasti natsionalnykh grupp v polietnicheskikh regionakh Rossii,” EtnoPanorama, No. 2, 2000, pp. 14–16.Google Scholar

31. Figures according to the 1989 census. For interesting works on inter-ethnic relations in Bashkortostan in the 1990s, see Gallyamov, Rushan R., Mnogonatsionalnyy gorod: Etnosotsiologicheskie ocherki (Ufa: 1996); Azat M. Gafurov, Formirovanie etnicheskoy, konfessionalnoy i grazhdanskoy identichnosti natsionalnostei Bashkortostana v 90-e gody XX veka (Moskva: Institut etnologii i antropologii RAN, 2000).Google Scholar

32. Figures from M. N. Guboglo, R. G. Kuzeev, G. Kh, Zhakhnazarov, eds, Resursy mobilizovannoy etnichnosti (Moskva-Ufa: TSIMO, 1997), p. 152.Google Scholar

33. Author's interview with Niaz A. Mazhitov. Ufa, February 2001.Google Scholar

34. The 1989 census put the proportion of ethnic Russians at 81.5% of the population. In the 2002 census, the proportion had fallen to 79.8%.Google Scholar

35. Author's interview with A. N. Dubovskiy. Ufa, February 2001.Google Scholar

36. Zayavlenie. Generalnomu Prokuroru Ustinovu, Iu. V. Undated document, signed by A. N. Dubovskiy.Google Scholar

37. Author's interview with Airat S. Giniyatullin. Ufa, February 2001.Google Scholar

38. Ovrutskiy, Lev: Razgavory c Khakimovym , Panorama-Forum, 2000, No. 23, spetsialnyy vypusk, Kazan, 2001, p. 163.Google Scholar

39. Khakimov is the director of the Institute of History at Tatarstan's Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar

40. “Zapros O sootvetstvii Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii postanovleniya Pravitelstvo Rossiyskoy Federatsii,” ot 8 yulya 1997 goda No. 828 “Ob utverzhdenii Polozheniya o pasporte grazhdanina Rossiyskoy Federatsii, obraztsa blanka i opisaniya pasporta grazdanina Rossiyskoy Federatsii.”Google Scholar

41. Eskin, Blake, “Russian Jews, in Sign of the Times, Call for Return of ‘Fifth Point’,” The Ethnic NewsWatch , 29 May 1998.Google Scholar

42. The respondents did not all have Jewish as their passport nationality. Rather, they were people who by the researchers were deemed Jews on the basis of their last names, passport entries and self-identification.Google Scholar

43. Ryvkina, Rozalina, “Experts: The ‘Jewish question’ in post-Soviet Russia,” Segodnya, 8 May 1996. Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press, Vol. XLVIII, No. 20, 1996, p. 12.Google Scholar

44. Frenkel, Aleksandr, “In defense of ‘line five’,” Nezavisimaya gazeta , 10 November 1997. Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press, Vol. XLIX, No. 45, p. 14.Google Scholar

45. “The myth about a moral crisis,” op. cit., Nezavisimaya gazeta , 11 February 1998.Google Scholar

46. Starovoitova, Galina: “One must be proud of one's personality,” Argumenty i Fakty , No. 45, 1997. Translation from “What the Papers Say,” November 10 1997.Google Scholar

47. Conversation with the author. Kazan, February 2001.Google Scholar

48. Figures from L. N. Terentova, reprinted in Karklins, Rasma, Ethnic Relations in the USSR. The Perspective From Below (London: Allen & Unwin, 1986), p. 38.Google Scholar

49. Figures for the ethnic composition of each of the federal subjects are due to be published in November 2004. Cumulative findings from the census are available at www.perepis2002.ru.Google Scholar

50. Author's interview with A. N. Dubovskiy. Ufa, February 2001.Google Scholar

51. “Chto dostanem iz ‘shirokikh shtani’?” Vremya i dengi , 25 October 2000.Google Scholar

52. Falyakhov, Rustem, “Uzhivutsya li bars s orlom pod odnoy oblozhkoy,” Vechernyaya Kazan , 19 December 2000.Google Scholar

53. Ofitova, Svetlana: “Vladimir Putin reshil natsionalnyy vopros,” Segodnya, 17 February 2000.Google Scholar

54. “Pasportizatsiya respublik,” Izvestiya, 16 December 2000.Google Scholar

55. Author's interview with Vladimir Zorin. Kazan, February 2001.Google Scholar

56. RIA Novosti, as reported by Pravda.ru, 9 June 2001; Jamestown Monitor , 12 June 2001.Google Scholar

57. Advisory Committee on the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities. Opinion on the Russian Federation . ACFC/INF/OP/I(2003)005.Google Scholar

58. See Arel, Dominique, “Political Stability in Multinational Democracies: Comparing Language Dynamics in Brussels, Montreal and Barcelona,” in Gagnon, A. G. and Tully, J., eds, Multinational Democracies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp. 65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

59. See Smooha, Sammy, “Types of Democracy and Modes of Conflict Management in Ethnically Divided Societies,” Nations and Nationalism, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2002, pp. 423–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar