Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T08:14:07.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Work on Balanced Accounts in the CSO: History and Prospects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

P.B. Kenny
P.B. Kenny*
Affiliation:
Central Statistical Office
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A technique for producing balanced national accounts was described by Stone, Champernowne and Meade in 1942, but there has so far been little use of the method in official publications. This article describes the experimental work undertaken recently by the Central Statistical Office and offers a personal view of the potential for further development. A variation of the original method of Stone et al, called partitioned balancing, seems likely to be useful in complex cases.

Type
Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 135 , February 1991 , pp. 79 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Byron, R.P., (1978), ‘The estimation of large social account matrices’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, vol. 141, pp. 359–67.Google Scholar
Cso, (1989), ‘An investigation with balancing the UK national and financial accounts, 1985-7’, Economic Trends, No. 424, February, pp. 74–103.Google Scholar
Durbin, J. and Fisher, H.R., (undated), ‘The adjustment of observations with application to national income statistics’, mimeo.Google Scholar
Stone, J.R.N., Champernowne, D.G., and Meade, J.E., (1942), ‘The precision of national income accounting estimates’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 9, pp. 111–25.Google Scholar
Weale, M.R. (1988), ‘The reconciliation of values, volumes and prices in the national accounts’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, vol. 151, pp. 211–21.Google Scholar