Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:25:56.939Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Requiring The Long-Term Unemployed to Train: Is Benefit Conditionality Effective?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Heather Rolfe
Heather Rolfe*
Affiliation:
National Institute of Economic and Social Research
*
1E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Conditionality has increasingly been part of benefit entitlement and its effects have been examined in a number of ways. While the focus of previous research has been on general conditions such as job search and acceptance of job offers, this paper examines conditionality specifically in relation to participation in training. Using data from a qualitative evaluation of a government programme, the Skills Conditionality pilot, the paper uses two hypotheses to critically assess the effectiveness of conditionality as a benefits policy: that it is successful in increasing participation in training; and that it is harmful by reducing time for job search.

Keywords

Unemploymentqualitative evaluationconditionalitytrainingemployabilityI30I38Z18
Type
Research Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 219 , January 2012 , pp. R65 - R76
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author would like to thank NIESR colleagues Richard Dorsett who led the quantitative evaluation of the Skills Conditionality pilot and Anitha George who worked on the qualitative evaluation. She would also like to thank the three anonymous reviewers for their guidance. NIESR is grateful to the Department for Work and Pensions who commissioned the research on which this paper is based and to the research respondents whose experiences are presented in this paper. The author is responsible for the interpretation of data presented in the paper.

JEL Classifications: 130; 138; Z18

References

Bryman, A. and Burgess, R. (eds) (1993), Analysing Qualitative Data, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Bryson, A., Jacobs, J. (1992), Policing the Workshy: Benefit Control, Labour Markets and the Unemployed, Avebury, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Bryson, A. (2005), ‘Working off welfare’, chapter 4 in Bochel, H., Bochel, C., Page, R. and Sykes, R. (eds), Social Policy: Issues and Developments, Harlow, Pearson Education, pp. 66–86.Google Scholar
Cebulla, A. (2005), ‘The road to Britain's New Deal’, in Cebulla, A., Ashworth, K., Greenberg, D., Walker, R., Welfare to Work: New Labour and the US Experience, Aldershot and Burlington, VT, Ashgate.Google Scholar
Crisp, R., Fletcher, D.R. (2008), A Comparative Review of Workfare Programmes in the United States, Canada and Australia, Department for Work and Pensions, Report 533.Google Scholar
DWP (2009), ‘Realising potential: developing personalised conditionality and support: a discussion paper on next steps in implementing the Gregg Review’, London, DWP.Google Scholar
DWP (2010), Universal Credit: Welfare that Works, White Paper Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions by Command of Her Majesty November 2010, Cm 7 9 5 7.Google Scholar
Dorsett, R. (2008), Pathways to Work for New and Repeat Incapacity Benefits Claimants: Evaluation Synthesis Report, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report No. 525, London, HMSO.Google Scholar
Dorsett, R., Rolfe, H., George, A. (2011), The Skills Training Conditionality Pilot: evaluation report, Department for Work and Pensions, Report 768.Google Scholar
Glaser, B., Strauss, A. (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory, Chicago, Aldine.Google Scholar
Gregg, P. (2008), Realising Potential: A Vision for Personalised Conditionality and Support, An Independent Report to the Department for Work and Pensions, London, DWP.Google Scholar
Griggs, J., Bennett, F. (2009), Rights and Responsibilities in the Social Security System, Occasional Paper no. 6, London, Social Security Advisory Committee.Google Scholar
Griggs, J., Evans, M. (2010), Sanctions Within Conditional Benefit Systems: A Review of Evidence, York, Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Howe, L. (1990), Being Unemployed in Northern Ireland: An Ethnographic Study, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jobcentre Plus and Skills Funding Agency (2011), Skills Conditionality Toolkit, Memo to Colleges and Training Organisations, Next Step, Jobcentre Plus and Skills Funding Agency, July.Google Scholar
Letkemann, P. (2002), ‘Unemployed professionals, stigma management and derivative stigmata’, Work, Employment and Society, 16 (3), pp. 511–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, C. (2009), ‘In a lonely place? Social networks, job seeking and the experience of long-term unemployment’, Social Policy and Society, 9, 1, pp. 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machin, S., Marie, O. (2004), ‘Crime and benefit sanctions’, CEP Discussion Paper No. 645, London, Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
McVicar, D. (2008), ‘Job search monitoring intensity, unemployment exit and job entry: quasi-experimental evidence from the UK’, Labour Economics, 15, pp. 1451–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McQuaid, R.W., Lindsay, C. (2005), ‘The concept of employability’, Urban Studies, 42, 2, pp. 179–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalf, H., Meadows, P., Rolfe, H., Dhudwar, A. (2009), Evaluation of the Impact of Skills for Life Learning: Longitudinal Survey of Adult Learners on College-based Literacy and Numeracy Courses, London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.Google Scholar
Nutley, S., Davies, H., Walter, I. (2002), Evidence Based Policy and Practice: Cross Sector Lessons From the UK, ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice, Working Paper 9.Google Scholar
Peters, M., Joyce, L. (2006) (http://research.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd5/report_abstracts/rr_abstracts/rra_313.asp). _Areview of the Sanctions Regime: Summary Research Findings, London, Department for Work and Pensions, Report 313.Google Scholar
Reed, H. (2010) Flexible with the Truth? Exploring the Relationship between Labour Market Flexibility and Labour Market Performance, A Report for the TUC, Landman Economics.Google Scholar
Rosholm, M., Skipper, L. (2009), ‘Is labour market training a curse for the unemployed? Evidence from a social experiment’, Journal of Applied Economics, 24, pp. 338–65.Google Scholar
Sanderson, I. (2006), Worklessness in Deprived Neighbourhoods: A Review of Evidence, London, Department for Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar
Zandvliet, K., Gelderblom, A., Korolkova, K., de Koning, J. (2006), Effectiviteit van sancties bij Arbeidsmarkt — en Reintegratidbeleid: lessen uit het Buitenland, Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid, Netherlands.Google Scholar