Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:21:01.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paying for University: The Impact of Increasing Costs on Student Employment, Debt and Satisfaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Hilary Metcalf
Hilary Metcalf*
Affiliation:
National Institute of Economic and Social Research
*
e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The costs of higher education in the UK have shifted increasingly from the state to the student (and students' families). In 1998, a fee contribution of £1,000 per annum was introduced for new entrants to full-time degree courses. This paper examines its effect on debt, term-time employment and student satisfaction. The analysis uses data from a survey of two cohorts of students and identifies how the impact varied with student and course characteristics. Fees led to an increase in student debt (particularly for disabled students and for students who did not receive financial support from their families) and a decline in student satisfaction. No general impact on term-time employment was identified, but term-time employment increased for students who did not receive financial support from their families. Whilst for these two groups inequality was increased, fees appeared to lead to greater equality, in terms of term-time employment, between children of graduate and non-graduate parents. The paper discusses the implications for the introduction of top-up fees in 2006.

Keywords

Higher educationuniversityfundingfeestop-up feesequalitydisabled peopleethnicitygenderfinancesocial classterm-time workingstudentemploymentdebtsatisfactionpolicydisadvantageII2I20I22I28I29
Type
Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 191 , January 2005 , pp. 106 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This paper has been produced as part of a Leverhulme Trustfunded study into the effects of fees on higher education. We are most grateful to the Leverhulme Trust for its support. My thanks also to the other members of the research team: Phil Stevens, Heather Rolfe and Martin Weale.

References

Barke, M., Braidford, P., Houston, M., Hunt, A., Lincoln, I., Morphet, C., Stone, I. and Walker, A. (2000), Students in the Labour Market: Nature, Extent and Implications of Term-time Employment among University of Northumbria Undergraduates, Research Report No. 215, London, DfEE.Google Scholar
Burnhill, P., Garner, C. and McPherson, A. (1990), ‘Parental education, socio-economic group, and entry to higher education, 1976-1988’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 153, 2, pp. 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callender, C. and Kemp, M. (2000), Changing Student Finances: Income, Expenditure and Take-up of Student Loans among Full and Part-time Higher Education Students in 1998-99, Research Report no.213, London, DfEE.Google Scholar
Callender, C. and Kempson, E. (1996), Student Finances: Income, Expenditure and Take-up of Student Loans, London, Policy Studies Institute.Google Scholar
Connor, H. and Dewson, S. with Tyers, C., Eccles, J., Regan, J. and Aston, J. (2001), Social Class and Higher Education: Issues Affecting Decisions on Participation by Lower Social Class Groups, Research Report No. 267, London, DfEE.Google Scholar
Cubie, A. (1999), Student Finance: Fairness for the Future. Report of the Independent Committee of Inquiry into Student Finance, Edinburgh, The Scottish Executive, http://www.studentfinance.org.uk/final/Google Scholar
Curtis, S. and Shani, N. (2002), ‘The effect of taking paid employment during term-time on students’ academic studies’, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 26, 2, pp 129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Education and Employment Committee (2001a), Higher Education: student retention, Sixth Report, HC 124, London, House of Commons.Google Scholar
Education and Employment Committee (2001b) Higher Education Access, Fourth Report, HC 124, London, House of Commons.Google Scholar
Ford, J., Bosworth, D. and Wilson, R. (1995), ‘Part-time work and full-time higher education’, Studies in Higher Education, 20, 2, pp. 187–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jesson, D. and Gray, J. (1990), Access, Entry and Potential Demand for Higher Education amongst 18-19 year olds in England & Wales, Youth Cohort Report No 12, Sheffield, Employment Department/Training Agency.Google Scholar
Lindsay, R. and Paton-Saltzberg, R. (1996), The Effects of Paid Employment on the Academic Performance of Full-Time Students in a British ‘New’ University, Consultancy Report, Oxford, Oxford Brookes University. http://www.brookes.ac.uk/schools/social/psych/staff/lindsay.htmlGoogle Scholar
Metcalf, H. (2003), ‘Increasing inequality in higher education: the role of term-time working’, Oxford Review of Education, 29, 3, September.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OFFA (2004), Producing Access Agreements OFFA guidance to institutions, Bristol, OFFA, http://www.offa.org.uk/pubs/04_01.pdfGoogle Scholar
Payne, J. (1995), Qualifications Between 16 and 18: A Comparison of Achievements on Routes Beyond Compulsory Schooling, Youth Cohort Report no 32, Sheffield, Employment Department.Google Scholar
Roberts, R., Golding, J., Towell, T., Reid, S., Woodford, S., Vetere, A. and Weinreb, I. (2000), ‘Mental and physical health in students: the role of economic circumstances’, British Journal of Health Psychology, 5, 3, September, pp. 289–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, D. and Hillman, J. (1997), Widening Participation in Higher Education by Students from Lower Socio-economic Groups and Students with Disabilities, National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education, Report 6, London, HMSO.Google Scholar
Stevens, P. and Weale, M. (2004), ‘Lazy students? A study of student time use’, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, Discussion Paper No. 233.Google Scholar
UNITE/MORI (2003), Student Living Report 2003, Bristol, UNITE. http://www.unite-group.co.uk/UNITEDM.DLL/Student_Living_Report_2003.pdf?/docs/1760.datGoogle Scholar