Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:47:37.132Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Implications of The National Employment Savings Trust for Vulnerable Sectors of the UK Labour Market: A Reduced-Form Statistical Evaluation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Justin van de Ven
Justin van de Ven*
Affiliation:
National Institute of Economic and Social Research
*
1 e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The National Employment Savings Trust (NEST) is a new pension scheme that will be introduced for employees on modest incomes in the UK from 2012. This paper draws out the implications of the NEST, focusing upon low-paid employees and their employers using data from the Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings. The results suggest that the NEST will increase labour costs by between 0.6 and 0.8 per cent on average, and have a disproportionate effect on low pay industries and private sector firms employing fewer than 25 employees. The analysis highlights the potential role of the minimum wage to shield low pay workers from paying a share of the subsidies that the NEST will afford to its members.

Keywords

Pension savinglow payemployer pensionD31H22
Type
Research Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 219 , January 2012 , pp. R77 - R89
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am grateful to the Low Pay Commission for financial support to conduct this study. I received useful comments regarding the research from attendees at the Low Pay Commission research Workshop in October 2010, and from Gerry Franks, Tim Butcher and two anonymous referees on earlier drafts. Anitha George conducted preliminary analysis in relation to the work presented here.

JEL Classifications: D31; H22

References

Brewer, M., Browne, J., Emmerson, C., Goodman, A., Muriel, A., Tetlow, G. (2007), ‘Pensioner poverty over the next decade: what role for tax and benefit reform?’, IFS Commentary 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, J.J., Laibson, D., Madrian, B.C., Metrick, A. (2002), ‘Defined contribution pensions: plan rules, paticipation choices, and the path of least resistance’, Tax Policy and the Economy, 16, pp. 67–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DWP (2006), Personal Accounts: a new way to save, Norwich, The Stationary Office.Google Scholar
DWP (2006a), Security in Retirement: towards a new pensions systemNorwich, The Stationary Office.Google Scholar
DWP (2009), ‘Saving for retirement: implications of pensions reforms on financial incentives to save for retirement’, DWP Research Report 558.Google Scholar
DWP (2010), Workplace Pension Reform Regulations Impact Assessment, 12 January.Google Scholar
Emmerson, C., Wakefield, M. (2009), ‘Amounts and accounts: reforming private pension enrolment’, IFS Commentary 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forth, J., Stokes, L. (2008), ‘Employers’ pension provision survey 2007’, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report 545.Google Scholar
Levell, P., May, R., O'Dea, C., Phillips, D. (2009), ‘A survey of the UK benefit system’, Institute for Fiscal Studies Briefing Note, 13.Google Scholar
Madrian, B.C., Shae, D.F. (2001), ‘The power of suggestion: inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behaviour’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, pp. 1149–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, S. (2006), ‘Employers’ pension provision survey 2005’, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report 329.Google Scholar
OECD (2009), Pensions at a Glance 2009, Paris, OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
PPI (2007), ‘Will personal accounts increase pension saving’, Briefing Note 42.Google Scholar
Pensions Commission (2004), Pensions: Challenges and Choices, Norwich, The Stationary Office.Google Scholar
Pensions Commission (2005), A New Pension Settlement for the Twenty-First Century, Norwich, The Stationary Office.Google Scholar
van de Ven, J., George, A. (2011), ‘Financial implications of the National Employment Savings Trust’, Report to the Low Pay Commission, www.lowpay.gov.uk/lowpay/research/pdf/NIESRFinal.pdf.Google Scholar