Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T13:20:33.395Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Commentary: The Stern Review's Economics of Climate Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Partha Dasgupta*
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

These comments were prepared for a seminar on the Stern Review's Economics of Climate Change, organised by the Foundation for Science and Technology at the Royal Society, London, on November 8, 2006. The Review is a long and impressive document. The authors have put together much that is now known about the effects of carbon emissions on human well-being and they remind readers of those matters that are very unknown. It is possible though that readers will not notice that the authors have treated one important aspect of the Review's economic analysis cavalierly. The comments that follow are directed at that aspect.

References

Ackerman, F. and Finlayson, I.J. (2006), ‘The economics of inaction on climate change: a sensitivity analysis’, Working paper.Google Scholar
Cline, W. (1993), ‘Give greenhouse abatement a fair chance’, Finance and Development, World Bank/IMF, March, pp. 35.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, P. (2005), ‘Three conceptions of intergenerational justice’, in Lillehammer, H. and Mellor, D.H. (eds), Ramsey's Legacy, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ramsey, F. (1928), ‘A mathematical theory of saving’, Economic Journal, 38, pp. 543–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar