Hostname: page-component-669899f699-cf6xr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-05T23:55:58.496Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Cohesion: Converging and Diverging Trends

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Andy Green ,
Germ Janmaat  and
Helen Cheng
Andy Green*
Affiliation:
Institute of Education, University of London
Germ Janmaat
Affiliation:
Institute of Education, University of London
Helen Cheng
Affiliation:
Institute of Education, University of London
*
e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Social theorists frequently argue that social cohesion is under threat in developed societies from the multiple pressures of globalisation. This article seeks to test this hypothesis through examining the trends across countries and regions in key indicators of social cohesion, including social and political trust, tolerance and perceptions of conflict. It finds ample evidence of long-term declines in cohesion in many countries, not least as exemplified by the erosion of social and political trust, which is particularly dramatic in the UK. The trends are not entirely convergent, since on most indicators Nordic countries have become more cohesive, yet each country faces challenges. In the final section the authors argue that different ‘regimes of social cohesion’ can be identified in specific clusters of countries which are based on different cultural and institutional foundations. In the ‘liberal model’, which applies in the UK and the US, the greatest threat to cohesion comes not from increasing cultural diversity, but from increasing barriers to mobility and the subsequent atrophy of faith in individual opportunity and meritocratic rewards — precisely those beliefs which have traditionally held liberal societies together.

Keywords

Social cohesiontrustinequalityD63D74
Type
Research Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 215 , January 2011 , pp. R6 - R22
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

∗

This work was supported by the Economic and Social Research Council Centre for Research on Learning and Life Chances in Knowledge Economies and Societies (LLAKES); grant number RES-594-28-0001.

References

Alesina, A. and La Ferrara, E. (2002), ‘Who trusts others?’, Journal of Public Economics, 85, pp. 207–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almond, G.A. and Verba, A. (1963), The Civic Culture, Princeton N.J., Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BBC News (2005), Denmark's Immigration Issue, 19 February, at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/4276963.stm (accessed 25 July, 2010).Google Scholar
Beck, U. (1999), What Is Globalization?, Cambridge, Polity Press.Google Scholar
Beck, U. (2004), Ulrich Beck - Johannes Wills: Conversations with Ulrich Beck, Cambridge, Polity Press.Google Scholar
Blanden, J., Gregg, P. and Machin, S. (2005), Intergenerational Mobility in Europe and North America: A Report Supported by the Sutton Trust, Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brubaker, R. (1992), Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany, Boston, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Canovan, M. (1996), Nationalism and Political Theory, Cheltemham, Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Castells, M. (1997), The Power of Identity. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Vol 11, Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Deary, I.J., Batty, G.D. and Gale, C.R. (2008), ‘Bright children become enlightened adults’, Psychological Science, 19, pp. 1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delhey, J. and Newton, K. (2005), ‘Predicting cross-national levels of social trust: global pattern or Nordic exceptionalism?’, European Sociological Review, pp. 331–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorling, D. (2009), Injustice: Why Social Inequality Persists, Bristol, Policy Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1964), The Division of Labour in Society, translated by Simpson, G., New York, The Free Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge, Polity Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (2005), ‘Inequality of incomes and opportunities’, in Giddens, A. and Diamond, P. (eds), The New Egalitarianism, Cambridge, Polity Press.Google Scholar
Green, A. and Janmaat, J.-G.(forthcoming), Regimes of Social Cohesion: Societies and the Crisis of Globalisation, London, Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, A., Janmaat, J-G. and Han, C. (2009), ‘Regimes of social cohesion’, LLAKES Research Paper 1, London, Institute of Education.Google Scholar
Green, A., Preston, J. and Janmaat, G. (2006), Education, Equality and Social Cohesion, Basingstoke, Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A. (1991), Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Cambridge, Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hall, P. (1999), ‘Social capital in Britain’, British Journal of Policy, 29, pp. 417–61.Google Scholar
Hall, P. and Soskice, D. (eds) (2001), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helliwell, J. (2003), ‘How's life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being’, Economic Modelling, 20, 2, pp. 331–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, M., Reeskens, T., Stolle, D. and Trappers, A. (2009), ‘Ethnic diversity and generalized trust in Europe. A cross- national multilevel study’, Comparative Political Studies, 42(2), pp. 198–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutton, W. (2002), The World We're In, London, Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. (1997), Modernization and Postmodernization, Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. and Soroka, S. (1999), ‘Social capital in a multicultural society: the case of Canada’, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Political Science Association, Sherbrooke QC.Google Scholar
Kohn, H. (2008), The Idea of Nationalism: A Study in its Origins and Background, New Brunswick, Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Knack, S. and Keefer, P. (1997), ‘Does social capital have an economic pay-off? A cross-country investigation’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, CXII, pp. 1251–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, C. (2009), ‘Why social cohesion declines in liberal regimes and increases in social democratic regimes’, Paper for RC 19 Montreal Conference, Aarlborg University.Google Scholar
Letki, N. (2006), ‘Does diversity erode social cohesion? Social capital and race in British neighbourhoods’, Unpublished paper, Nuffield College, Oxford.Google Scholar
Marsh, C. (1986), ‘Social class and occupation’, in Burgess, R.G. (ed.), Key Variables in Social Investigations, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Martin, H.P. and Schumann, H. (1996), The Global Trap, London, Zed Books.Google Scholar
Newton, K. (1999), ‘Social and political trust in established democracies’, in Norris, P. (ed.), Critical Citizens, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
North, A. (1990), ‘A transaction theory of politics’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2, pp. 355–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osberg, L. (ed.) (2003), The Economic Implications of Social Cohesion, Toronto, Toronto University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, R. (1993), Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. (2000), Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York, Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. (2007), ‘E pluribus unum: diversity and community in the twentyfirst century’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 20, pp. 139–74.Google Scholar
Reich, R. (2001), The Future of Success, New York, Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Reeskens, T. (2007), ‘Defining social cohesion in diverse societies’, paper presented at the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, 30 August-2 September, 2007.Google Scholar
Rutter, M., Tizard, J. and Whitmore, K. (1970), Education, Health and Behaviour, London, Longman.Google Scholar
Schoon, I. and Cheng, H. (in press), ‘Determinants of political trust: a life time learning model’, Journal of Developmental Psychology.Google Scholar
Schoon, I., Cheng, H., Gale, C.R., Batty, D. and Deary, I.J. (2010), ‘Social status, cognitive ability, and educational attainment as predictors of liberal social attitudes and political trust’, Intelligence, 38, pp. 144–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiglitz, J. (2004), The Roaring Nineties, London, Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. (2010), Freefall: Free Markets and the Sinking of the World Economy, London, Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Sturgis, P., Read, S. and Allum, N. (2010), ‘Does intelligence foster generalized trust? An empirical test using the UK birth cohort studies’, Intelligence, 38, pp. 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Touraine, A. (2000), Can We Live Together?, Cambridge, Polity Press.Google Scholar
Thurow, L. (1996), The Future of Capitalism, London, Nicholas Brealey Publishing.Google Scholar
Uslaner, E. (2002), ‘The moral foundations of trust’, paper for the Symposium, ‘Trust in the Knowledge Society’, University of Jyvaskyla, Jyvaskala, Finland, 20 September, 2002, Department of Government and Politics, University of Maryland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uslaner, E. (2003), ‘Trust, democracy and governance: can government policies influence generalised trust?’, in Hooghe, M. and Stolle, D. (Eds), Generating Social Capital: Civil Society and Institutions in Comparative Perspective, Basingstoke, Palgrave.Google Scholar
Wade, R. (2001), ‘Winners and losers: the global distribution of income is becoming more unequal: that should be a matter of greater concern than it is’, The Economist, 359 (8219), pp. 93–7.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, R. (1996), Unhealthy Societies: The Affluence of Inequality, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, R. and Pickett, K. (2009), The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost always Do Better, London, Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Willetts, D. (2010), The Pinch: How the Baby Boomers Took Their Children's Future - and Why They Should Give It Back, London, Atlantic Books.Google Scholar