Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:25:43.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Retrenchment, Reform, Continuity: Welfare under the Coalition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Declan Gaffney
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Coalition's record on working age social security is reviewed under the headings of continuity (with the policies of the previous government), retrenchment and reform. Under continuity, the Coalition's decision to proceed with the previous government's planned reassessment of incapacity benefit claims was a notable policy mistake which led to the near-collapse of the assessment system by 2014. Retrenchment measures are dominated by benefit uprating changes which, along with measures targeting higher-income groups, have been less regressive than alternative approaches to expenditure reduction. However these changes were accompanied by a number of smaller-scale retrenchment measures, with substantial cumulative impacts on income. Retrenchment has thus been less regressive than it might have been but more regressive than it needed to be, taking the retrenchment targets as given. Policy failure and exogenous economic factors have offset the effect of retrenchment measures, with the result that expenditure by 2014/15 was little different to that planned in the Labour government's last budget. Full implementation of major reforms has been deferred to the next parliament. The main achieved policy change has been an unprecedented tightening of the benefit sanctions regime.

Keywords

social securitywelfare reformfiscal retrenchmentdisabilityausterityH55I38
Type
Research Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 231 , February 2015 , pp. R44 - R53
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adam, S. (2013), ‘Do the UK government's welfare reforms make work pay?’, IFS Working Paper W13/26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akerlof, G. (2005), ‘The economics of ‘tagging’ as applied to the optimal income tax, welfare programs and manpower planning’, in Akerlof, G. (ed.) Explorations in Pragmatic Economics, Oxford University Press, p. 100.Google Scholar
Castles, F. (2004), The Future of the Welfare State: Crisis Myths and Crisis Realities, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Centre for Economic and Social Inclusion (2015), ‘Benefit sanctions policy beyond the Oakley Review’, submission to the Work and Pensions Committee from the Centre for Economic and Social Inclusion.Google Scholar
Centre for Social Justice (2009), Dynamic Benefits: Towards Welfare that Works.Google Scholar
Clark, T. (with Heath A.) (2014), Hard Times: The Divisive Toll of the Economic Slump, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Daily Mail (1994), ‘Iain Duncan Smith, Every day, every working Briton pays £13 in tax to those on state benefit. And it's going to get worse …’, 12 April, full text at http://benefitscroungingscum.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/ids-his-welfare-reform-zeal-so-much-for.html.Google Scholar
De Agostini, P., Hills, J. and Sutherland, H. (2014), ‘Were we really all in it together? The distribution effects of the UK Coalition government's tax-benefit policy changes’, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE, http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/spcc/wp109.pdf.Google Scholar
DWP (2008), Raising Expectations and Increasing Support – Reforming Welfare for the Future.Google Scholar
DWP (2010), ‘Explanatory memorandum to the Employment and Support Allowance (transitional provisions, Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit) (existing awards) Regulations 2010’, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2010/875/pdfs/uksiem_20100875_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Equality and Human Rights Commission/Landman Economics/NIESR (2014), ‘Cumulative Impact Assessment: A Research Report by Landman Economics and the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) for the Equality and Human Rights Commission’, available at http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/sites/default/files/publication_pdf/Cumulative%20Impact%20Assessment%20full%20report%2030-07-14.pdf.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Freud, D. (2007), Reducing Dependency, Increasing Opportunity; Options for the Future of Welfare to Work: An Independent Report to the Department for Work and Pensions.Google Scholar
Gaffney, D. (2011), ‘The inexplicable rise in disability living allowance explained’, Left Foot Forward, available at http://leftfootforward.org/2011/02/rise-in-disability-living-allowance-explained/.Google Scholar
Gaffney, D. (2015), ‘Working age cash benefits’, TUC (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Gregg, P. (2008), Realising Potential: A Vision for Personalised Conditionality and Support, Department for Work and Pensions.Google Scholar
Hills (2014), Good Times, Bad Times: The Welfare Myth of Them and Us, Policy Press.Google Scholar
Hood, A. and Oakley, L. (2014), ‘The social security system: long-term trends and recent changes’, IFS Briefing Note BN156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, A. and Crewe, I. (2013), The Blunders of our Governments, 2nd edition, London, Oneworld Publications.Google Scholar
Kleven, H.J. (2014), ‘How can Scandinavians tax so much?’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28, 4, Fall, pp. 77–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, R., Shildrick, T. and Furlong, A. (2014), ‘In search of ‘intergenerational cultures of worklessness’: hunting the yeti and shooting zombies’, Critical Social Policy 34, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Audit Office (2014), Universal Credit: Progress Update, p. 58.Google Scholar
Nelson, F. (2014), ‘What's the secret behind our jobs miracle? Welfare reform’, Daily Telegraph, 18 July.Google Scholar
OECD (2011), Sick on the Job? Myths and Realities about Mental Health and Work, http://www.oecd.org/els/emp/sickonthejob2011.htm.Google Scholar
Office of Budget Responsibility (OBR) (2014), Welfare Trends Report.Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2014), ‘Variation in the inflation experience of UK households: 2003–2014’, http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/elmr/variation-in-the-inflation-experience-of-uk-households/2003-2014/sty-variation-in-the-inflation-experience-of-uk-households.html.Google Scholar
Portes, J. (2014), ‘Universal credit is a tale of failure that's still unfolding’, The Guardian, 24 October, http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/oct/27/unversal-credit-failure-timetable-costs-iain-duncan-smith.Google Scholar