Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:04:07.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hard or Soft? The Politics of Brexit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2016

Anand Menon*
Affiliation:
King's College, London
Brigid Fowler*
Affiliation:
The UK in a Changing Europe

Abstract

The British people voted for Brexit for a variety of reasons. A literature is emerging that seeks to explain the outcome using the increasing amount of aggregate and individual data being generated. Less often considered is the impact those factors that shaped the referendum outcome might continue to exert on the debate about the UK's future relationship with the EU. We argue that they will continue to weigh on political debates. The continued resonance of the Leave message militates against anything but what has come to be known as a ‘hard Brexit’.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Booth, S. and Ruparel, R. (2016), ‘What did the UK achieve in its EU renegotiation?’, Open Europe, February, https://docs.google.com/viewerng/viewer?url=http://openeurope.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/160221_OE_responds_to_deal.pdf.Google Scholar
Bulmer, S. (2008), ‘New labour, new European policy? Blair, Brown and utilitarian supranationalism’, Parliamentary Affairs, 61, 4, pp. 597620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, S. and Whittaker, M. (2016), ‘The importance of place: explaining the characteristics underpinning the Brexit vote across different parts of the UK,’ Resolution Foundation, July, http://www.resolutionfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Brexit-vote-v3.pdf.Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. and Heath, O. (2016), ‘The 2016 Referendum, Brexit and the left behind: an aggregate-level analysis of the result’, Political Quarterly, 87, 3, pp. 323–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, M. and Milazzo, C. (2015), ‘Britain, the European Union and the Referendum: what drives euroscepticism?’, Chatham House, December, https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/files/chathamhouse/publications/research/20151209EuroscepticismGoodwinMilazzo.pdf, p. 4.Google Scholar
Katwala, S., Rutter, J. and Ballinger, S. (2016), ‘What next after Brexit?’, British Future, August, http://www.britishfuture.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/What-next-after-Brexit.pdf.Google Scholar
Lanchester, J. (2016), ‘Brexit Blues’, London Review of Books, 38, 15, 28 July, pp. 36.Google Scholar
Langella, M. and Manning, A. (2016), ‘Who voted leave: the characteristics of individuals mattered, but so did those of local areas,’ LSE British Politics and Policy blog, 6 July, http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/explaining-the-vote-for-brexit.Google Scholar
Menon, A. and Salter, J.-P. (2016), ‘Britain's influence in the EU’, National Institute Economic Review, 236, 1, pp. 713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menon, A. and Salter, J.-P. (forthcoming), ‘Brexit: initial reflections’, International Affairs.Google Scholar
Menon, A. and Wright, V. (1998), ‘The paradoxes of ‘failure’: British EU policy making in comparative perspective’, Public Policy and Administration, 13, 4, p. 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisani-Ferry, J., Röttgen, N., Sapir, A., Tucker, P. and Wolff, G. B. (2016), ‘Europe after Brexit: a proposal for a continental partnership’, Bruegel, August, http://bruegel.org/2016/08/europe-after-brexit-a-proposal-for-a-continental-partnership.Google Scholar
Springford, J. (2016), ‘Why a hard Brexit looks likely’, Centre for European Reform, 19 September, https://www.cer.org.uk/publications/archive/bulletin-article/2016/why-hard-brexit-looks-likely.Google Scholar