Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T02:51:16.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ordinary varieties and the comparison between multiplier ideals and test ideals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2016

Mircea Mustaţă  and
Vasudevan Srinivas
Mircea Mustaţă
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, [email protected]
Vasudevan Srinivas
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Colaba, Mumbai 400005, [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We consider the following conjecture: if X is a smooth and irreducible n-dimensional projective variety over a field k of characteristic zero, then there is a dense set of reductions Xs to positive characteristic such that the action of the Frobenius morphism on Hn(Xs, OXs) is bijective. There is another conjecture relating certain invariants of singularities in characteristic zero (the multiplier ideals) with invariants in positive characteristic (the test ideals). We prove that the former conjecture implies the latter one in the case of ambient nonsingular varieties.

Keywords

13A3514F1814F30
Type
Research Article
Information
Nagoya Mathematical Journal , Volume 204 , December 2011 , pp. 125 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © Editorial Board of Nagoya Mathematical Journal 2011

References

[BMS] Blickle, M., Mustat˘ă, M., and Smith, K. E., Discreteness and rationality of F-thresholds, Michigan Math. J. 57 (2008), 463–483.Google Scholar
[BSTZ] Blickle, M., Schwede, K., Takagi, S., and Zhang, W., Discreteness and rationality of F-jumping numbers on singular varieties, Math. Ann. 347 (2010), 917–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[BK] Bloch, S. and Kato, K., p-adic étale cohomology, Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Etudes Sci. 63 (1986), 107–152.Google Scholar
[CL] Chambert-Loir, A., Cohomologie cristalline: un survol, Expo. Math. 16 (1998), 333–382.Google Scholar
[DI] Deligne, P. and Illusie, L., Relèvements modulo p2 et décomposition du complexe de de Rham, Invent. Math. 89 (1987), 247–270.Google Scholar
[Eis] Eisenbud, D., Commutative Algebra. With a View toward Algebraic Geometry, Grad. Texts in Math. 150, Springer, New York, 1995.Google Scholar
[Ha] Hara, N., A characterization of rational singularities in terms of injectivity of Frobenius maps, Amer. J. Math. 120 (1998), 981–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[HW] Hara, N. and Watanabe, K., F-regular and F-pure rings vs. log terminal and log canonical singularities, J. Algebraic Geom. 11 (2002), 363–392.Google Scholar
[HY] Hara, N. and Yoshida, K., A generalization of tight closure and multiplier ideals, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 355 (2003), 3143–3174.Google Scholar
[Hart] Hartshorne, R., Algebraic Geometry, Grad. Texts in Math. 52, Springer, New York, 1977.Google Scholar
[KKMS] Kempf, G., Knudsen, F., Mumford, D., and Saint-Donat, B., Toroidal Embeddings I, Lecture Notes in Math. 339, Springer, Berlin, 1973.Google Scholar
[Laz] Lazarsfeld, R., Positivity in Algebraic Geometry, II, Ergeb. Math. Grenzgeb. (3), Folge 49, Springer, Berlin, 2004.Google Scholar
[LLS] Lazarsfeld, R., Lee, K., and Smith, K. E., Syzygies of multiplier ideals on singular varieties, Michigan Math. J. 57 (2008), 511–521.Google Scholar
[MS] Mehta, V. B. and Srinivas, V., A characterization of rational singularities, Asian J. Math. 1 (1997), 249–271.Google Scholar
[Mus] Mustat˘ă, M. Bernstein-Sato polynomials in positive characteristic, J. Algebra 321 (2009), 128–151.Google Scholar
[MTW] Musta¸t˘a, M., Takagi, S., and Watanabe, K., “F-thresholds and Bernstein-Sato polynomials” in European Congress of Mathematics, Eur. Math. Soc., Zürich, 2005, 341–364.Google Scholar
[Og] Ogus, A., “Hodge cycles and crystalline cohomology” in Hodge Cycles, Motives, and Shimura Varieties, Lecture Notes in Math. 900, Springer, Berlin, 357–414.Google Scholar
[Sch] Schwede, K., F-adjunction, Algebra Number Theory 3 (2009), 907–950.Google Scholar
[ST] Schwede, K. and Tucker, K., On the behavior of test ideals under finite morphisms, preprint, arXiv:1003.4333v2 [math.AG]Google Scholar
[Smi] Smith, K. E., F-rational rings have rational singularities, Amer. J. Math. 119 (1997), 159–180.Google Scholar