Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:51:36.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Frobenius Extensions I.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2016

Tadasi Nakayama  and
Tosiro Tsuzuku
Tadasi Nakayama
Affiliation:
Mathematical Institute, Nagoya University
Tosiro Tsuzuku
Affiliation:
Mathematical Institute, Nagoya University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

As a generalization of the notion of Frobenius algebras over a field Kasch [103 introduced that of Frobenius extensions of a ring. The present writers [13] recently freed one of Kasch’s main theorems from its rather strong S-ring assumption of the ground ring. However, even with the removal of the S-ring assumption of the ground ring the notion does not seem general enough, and we wish, in the present paper and its sequel, to develope the theory upon the basis of a more general notion of Frobenius extensions. Thus, we replace the free module property of the extension by the projective module property (according to a general tendency in algebra), which has been done in fact in case of Frobenius algebras over a commutative ring in a previous work by Eilenberg and one of the writers [4], and, further, take automorphisms of the ground ring into the definition of Frobenius extensions (which seems quite natural particularly in case of non-commutative rings). To such generalized notion of Frobenius extensions we may extend many of Kasch’s theorems, including those which are immediate extensions of classical theorems for Frobenius algebras and those which are essentially new, as the above alluded endomorphism ring theorem. Also homological properties of Frobenius extensions, as were developed in Hirata’s [6] recent paper in succession to Eilenberg-Nakayama [4], can be extended to our present generalized case; we shall also exceed [4], [6] somewhat in considering injective and weak dimensions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Nagoya Mathematical Journal , Volume 17 , August 1960 , pp. 89 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © Editorial Board of Nagoya Mathematical Journal 1960

References

[1] Cartan, H.–Eilenberg, S., Homological Algebra, Princeton 1956.Google Scholar
[2] Eckmann, B.–Schopf, A., Über injektive Moduln, Arch. Math. 4 (1953), 75–78.Google Scholar
[3] Eilenberg, S., Homological dimension and syzygies, Ann. Math. 64 (1956), 246–269.Google Scholar
[4] Eilenberg, S.–Nakayama, T., On the dimension of modules and algebras II, Nagoya Math. J. 9 (1955), 1–16.Google Scholar
[5] Gopalakrishnan, N. S.–Ramabhadran, N.–Sridharan, R., A note on the dimension of modules and algebras, Jour. Indian Math. Soc. 21 (1957), 185–192.Google Scholar
[6] Hirata, K., On relative homological algebras of Frobenius extensions, Nagoya Math. J. 15 (1959), 17–28.Google Scholar
[7] Hochschild, G., Relative homological algebra, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc, 82 (1956), 246–269.Google Scholar
[8] Ikeda, M., A characterization of quasi-Frobenius rings, Osaka Math. J. 4 (1952), 203–210.Google Scholar
[9] Jans, J. P., Some remarks on symmetric and Frobenius algebras, Nagoya Math. J. 16 (1960), 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Kasch, F., Grundlagen einer Theorie der Frobeniuserweiterungen, Math. Ann. 127 (1954), 453–474.Google Scholar
[11] Nagao, H.–Nakayama, T., On the structure of (Mo)- and (Mu)-modules, Math. Z. 59 (1953), 164–170.Google Scholar
[12] Nakayama, T., On Frobenius algebras II, Ann. Math. 42 (1941), 1–21.Google Scholar
[13] Nakayama, T.–Tsuzuku, T., A remark on Frobenius extensions and endomorphism rings, Nagoya Math. J. 15 (1959), 9–16.Google Scholar