Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T05:31:00.056Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Galois Theory for Rings with Finitely Many Idempotents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2016

O. E. Villamayor  and
D. Zelinsky
O. E. Villamayor
Affiliation:
Universidad de Buenos Aires, Northwestern University
D. Zelinsky
Affiliation:
Universidad de Buenos Aires, Northwestern University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In [5], Chase, Harrison and Rosenberg proved the Fundamental Theorem of Galois Theory for commutative ring extensions S ⊃ R under two hypotheses: (i) 5 (and hence R) has no idempotents except 0 and l; and (ii) 5 is Galois over R with respect to a finite group G—which in the presence of (i) is equivalent to (ii′): S is separable as an R-algebra, finitely generated and projective as an R-module, and the fixed ring under the group of all R-algebra automorphisms of S is exactly R.

Type
Research Article
Information
Nagoya Mathematical Journal , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , July 1966 , pp. 721 - 731
Copyright
Copyright © Editorial Board of Nagoya Mathematical Journal 1966

References

[1] Auslander, M. and Buchsbaum, D., Ramification theory in Noetherian rings, Am. J. Math., 81 (1959), 749–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Auslander, M. and Goldman, O., The Brauer group of a commutative ring, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc, 97 (1960), 367–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Bourbaki, N., Algebre Commutative Ch. 1 and 2, Actualité, Sci. et Ind., no. 1290, Hermann, Paris 1961.Google Scholar
[4] Cartan, H. and Eilenberg, S., Homological Algebra, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N. J., 1956.Google Scholar
[5] Chase, S. U., Harrison, D. K. and Rosenberg, A., Galois theory and Galois cohomology of commutative rings, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, no. 52, 1965.Google Scholar
[6] Jacobson, N., Theory of Rings, Mathematical Surveys, no. 2, Amer. Math. Soc. Publ., New York.Google Scholar
[7] Rosenberg, A. and Zelinsky, D., Cohomology of infinite algebras, Trans. Amer, Math. Soc, 82 (1956), 85–98.Google Scholar