No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 January 2016
The proof of Proposition 1 and Theorem 2 in [3] is incorrect. Indeed, Sections 2.5 and 2.7 in [3] contain a vicious circle: the definition of the filtration Vi, 1 ≤ i ≤ n, in Section 2.5 of that article depends on the choice of the integers ni, when the definition of the integers ni in Section 2.7 depends on the choice of the filtration (Vi). Thus, only Theorem 1 and Corollary 1 in [3] are proved. In the following we will prove another result instead of [3, Proposition 1].