Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:25:05.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Zeolitization of Glassy Topopah Spring Tuff Under Hydrothermal Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Kevin G. Knauss*
Affiliation:
Earth Sciences Department, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550
Get access

Abstract

In support of the Nevada Nuclear Waste Storage Investigations Project experiments were conducted to study the effects of heat generated by a nuclear waste repository in densely welded, devitrified tuff on the underlying, compositionally-equivalent glassy tuff at Yucca Mtn. Solid wafers of glassy tuff were reacted with a dilute ground water for several months at 150°C and 250°C at 100 bars pressure in Dickson-type, gold-bag rocking autoclaves. The in-situ chemistry of the hydrothermal fluids was modeled and the chemical affinities for all possible mineral precipitation reactions (contained within the extensive database) were calculated using the EQ3/6 program.

In the 250°C experiment the calculations suggest that a zeolite mineral would be expected to form. Analyses of the run products showed that not only had the wafer been extensively corroded and the glass shards replaced by clinoptilolite, but pure clinoptilolite had precipitated directly from solution. In the 150°C experiment, although clay minerals were thermodynamically favored to form in the first half of the experiment, by the end of the run a zeolite mineral was predicted to form. Analyses of the run products showed no well-formed secondary minerals (clays or zeolites) had formed. At the lower temperature the effects of precipitation kinetics may preclude the formation of the zeolite within the time span of this experiment. In general the observations are in relatively good agreement with the geochemical model calculations. This type of study demonstrates the interpretive/predictive capabilities of a combined experimental/geochemical modeling approach to studies of nuclear waste isolation. This combined approach will aid in satisfying licensing requirements to assure long-term performance.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Knauss, K. G., Delany, J. M., Beiriger, W. J. and Peifer, D. W., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VIII, edited by Jantzen, C. M., Stone, J. A., Ewing, R. C. (Elsevier Science Publishers, N. Y., 1985) pp. 539546.Google Scholar
2. Levy, S. S., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VIII, edited by McVay, G. L. (Elsevier Science Publishers, N. Y., 1984) pp. 959966.Google Scholar
3. Knauss, K. G. and Beiriger, W. J., Geol. Soc. Am. Prog. Abstr. 16 (6), 561 (1984).Google Scholar
4. Wolery, T. J., Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report UCRL-52658, 1979.Google Scholar
5. Donahue, R. J. and Liou, J. G., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 49, 23492360 (1985).Google Scholar
6. Bish, D. L. (private communication).Google Scholar
7. Passaglia, E., Am. Mineral. 55, 12781301 (1970).Google Scholar