Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:42:19.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Using Nanoscience as a Theme for Capstone Projects in an Elementary Education Majors Science Course

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2013

Gina J. Mancini-Samuelson*
Affiliation:
St. Catherine University, 2004 Randolph Avenue, St. Paul MN 55105 U.S.A. The National Center for STEM Elementary Education, 2004 Randolph Avenue, St. Paul MN 55105 U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

The national interest in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) has called attention to P-12 education, the STEM pipeline. Education of teachers is a primary influence on the education of children in the classroom. While high school (and often middle school) teachers are versed in the content of a particular aspect of STEM (e.g. Mathematics or Chemistry), elementary teachers, on the other end of the pipeline, are educated as generalists, with a primary goal of setting the foundations for future learning.

In 2004, a team of STEM and education faculty at St. Catherine University (SCU) was called together, united by their interest in improving STEM education for all students at SCU, particularly women. Combining the content expertise of the biology, chemistry, physics/engineering, and mathematics departments with the methods expertise of the education department, the team designed courses that made STEM concepts more engaging and relevant to students. In 2010, the STEM Certificate was solidified and required of all elementary education students. It is comprised of three interdisciplinary, team-taught, lab based courses that are open to all undergraduate majors at the institution. Each course is centered on one discipline (i.e. biology, chemistry, or engineering/physics). Chemistry of Life is the chemistry-focused course. The course was designed to include a capstone project. As an introduction to materials science, nanoscience was selected as the theme for the projects. The topic allowed for socially relevant and also highly interdisciplinary projects. Students working in teams of three or four, designed projects, determined how to measure and obtain data, and analyzed and interpreted results. A content and confidence assessment given to students before and after the projects showed an increase in both their understanding of nanomaterials and their confidence in conducting a nanoscience project.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Norman, A., Is America Falling off a Flat Earth? (The National Academy Press, Washington DC, 2007). p.17.Google Scholar
Keunzi, J., J. Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education: Background, Federal Policy and Legislative Options. (Washington D.C., Congressional Research Service, 2008). p.11.Google Scholar
Committee on Science, Engineering and Public Policy, Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. (National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC, 2005). p. 162.Google Scholar
National Science Board, National action plan for addressing the critical needs of the U.S. science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education system. (National Science Foundation, Arlington VA, 2007). p. 23.Google Scholar
National Research Council, Educating teachers of science, mathematics, and technology: New practices for the new millennium. (National Academies Press, Washington DC, 2000). p. 111.Google Scholar
National Science Board, Preparing the next generation of STEM innovators: Identifying and developing our nation’s human capital. (National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, 2010). p. 17.Google Scholar
Murphy, T. and Mancini-Samuelson, G., Journal of College Science Teaching 42(2). 26 (2012).Google Scholar
Kovac, J., Journal of Chemical Education 68(11). 907 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koether, M., McGarey, D., Patterson, M., and Williams, D., Journal of Chemical Education 79(8). 934 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iimoto, D. and Frederick, K., Journal of Chemical Education 88(8). 1069 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, A. ACS Nano 3 (4). 762 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
nanosense.org (2004) SRI International (website).Google Scholar
http://www.nnin.org/nnin_edu.html (2004) National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network (website).Google Scholar
http://www.accessnano.org/ (2009) Commonwealth of Australia (website).Google Scholar
At the date this paper was written, URLs or links referenced herein were deemed to be useful supplementary material to this paper. Neither the author nor the Materials Research Society warrants or assumes for the content or availability of URLs referenced in this paper. Google Scholar