Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:04:48.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tunneling Injection Quantum-Dot Lasers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Shun Lien Chuang
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Electrical and Computer Engineering, 1406 W. Green Street, Urbana, Illinois, 61801, United States, 217-333-3359, 217-333-5701
Jungho Kim
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Electrical and Computer Engineering, United States
Peter K. Kondratko
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Electrical and Computer Engineering, United States
Gabriel Walter
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Electrical and Computer Engineering, United States
Nick Holonyak Jr.
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Electrical and Computer Engineering, United States
Richard B. Heller
Affiliation:
[email protected], Freescale Inc., United States
Xuebing B. Zhang
Affiliation:
[email protected], Georgia Institute of Technology, Electrical and Computer Engineering, United States
Russell D. Dupuis
Affiliation:
[email protected], Georgia Institute of Technology, Electrical and Computer Engineering, United States
Get access

Abstract

We investigate a tunneling injection InP quantum-dot (QD) laser theoretically and experimentally. The device consists of a single compressively strained InP QD layer coupled closely to two tensile strained InGaP quantum wells (QWs). While most tensile strained QW lasers in this wavelength (red) range lase in the transverse-magnetic (TM) polarization, our QD laser lases in the transverse-electric (TE) polarization from the first excited state of the compressively strained QDs, which is coupled to the ground state of the tensile-strained InGaP QWs. When we measure TE and TM modal gain spectra, a typical QW gain evolution behavior is observed at low injection currents, which can be theoretically explained by the quasi-equilibrium of carrier distribution. When the injection current is increased near threshold, a TE gain narrowing and a simultaneous TM gain pinning are observed in the measured modal gain spectra, which cannot be explained via the quasi-equilibrium model. We propose a polarization-dependent photon-mediated carrier re-distribution in the QD-coupled-QW structure to explain this TE and TM gain evolution behavior. When the injection current is just below threshold, the strong carrier depletion via stimulated emission due to coupling between the InP QD and InGaP QW states plays an important role in carrier re-distribution, which depends on the optical transition energy and polarization. This polarization-dependent photon-mediated carrier re-distribution explains the TE gain narrowing and TM gain pinning behavior. To quantitatively demonstrate the photon-mediated carrier re-distribution near the threshold current, a set of coupled rate equations are solved taking into account the polarization-dependent stimulated emission processes. The calculated polarization power ratio based on the coupled rate equations explains the experimental observations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bimberg, D., Kirstaedter, N., Ledentsov, N. N., Alferov, Z. I., Kop'ev, P. S., and Ustinov, V. M., IEEE J. Select. Topics Quantum Electron. 3, 196 (1997).Google Scholar
2. Walter, G., Chung, T., and Holonyak, N. Jr, Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 1126 (2002).Google Scholar
3. Ghosh, S., Pradhan, S., and Bhattacharya, P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 3055 (2002).Google Scholar
4. Kondratko, P. K., Chuang, S. L., Walter, G., Chung, T., and Holonyak, N. Jr, Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 4818 (2003).Google Scholar
5. Kim, J., Kondratko, P. K., Chuang, S. L., Walter, G., Holonyak, N. Jr, Heller, R. D., Zhang, X. B., and Dupuis, R. D., IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 41, 1369 (2005).Google Scholar
6. Ryou, J. H., Dupuis, R. D., Walter, G., Holonyak, N. Jr, Mathes, D. T., Hull, R., Reddy, C. V., and Narayanamurti, V., J. Appl. Phys. 91, 5313 (2002).Google Scholar