Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:07:14.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tribological Characteristics of Zr41.2Ti13.8Cu12.5Ni10.0Be22.5 Bulk Metallic Glass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Xi-Yong Fu
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210
D. A. Rigney
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210
Get access

Abstract

The sliding characteristics of Zr41.2Ti13.8Cu12.5Ni10.0Be22.5 bulk metallic glass have been examined in vacuum and in air using a pin/disk geometry without lubrication. The counterface material was either the same metallic glass (self-mated) or 52100 steel. Normal load was 0.1–1 kgf. The test system was equipped for continuous measurement of friction force. In addition, a Kelvin probe allowed continuous monitoring of changes in the structure and chemistry of the disk surface. Post-test characterization included optical and electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction and EDS of worn surfaces and debris. Friction coefficients in both vacuum and air were typical of those expected for ductile materials, with values ranging from 0.4 to 0.9 (higher values with lower load). Wear rates and average debris size increased with load. Wear rates were larger in air than in vacuum. Wear surface appearance and chemical composition were influenced by plastic deformation, material transfer and environmental interactions. After tests in air, the wear tracks and debris had a granular appearance and oxygen concentrations were high. Changes in the Kelvin probe signal correlated well with visual observations and with concentrations of oxygen detected by EDS.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Boswell, P.G., J. Mater. Sci. 14, p. 1505(1979).Google Scholar
2. Amuzu, J.K.A., J. Phys. D13, p. L127(1980).Google Scholar
3. Whang, S. H. and Giessen, B.C., in Rapidly Solidified Amorphous and Crystalline Alloys, eds. Kear, B.H., Giessen, B.C. and Cohen, M., North Holland (1982), p. 301.Google Scholar
4. Miyoshi, K. and Buckley, D.H., NASA Technical Reports No. 1990, 2001 and 2140.Google Scholar
5. Sudarsan, U., Chattopadhyay, K. and Kishore, C., in Rapidly Quenched Metals, Volumes 1 and 2, eds. Steeb, S. and Warlimont, H. (Elsevier, Oxford, 1985), p. 1439.Google Scholar
6. Dolezal, N. and Hausch, G., p. 1767, in Procs. cited in ref. 5 above.Google Scholar
7. Buckley, D.H., Surface Effects in Adhesion, Friction, Wear and Lubrication, Elsevier, 1981.Google Scholar
8. Morris, D.G., J. Mater. Sci. 17, p. 1789(1982).Google Scholar
9. Morris, D.G., pp. 17751778, in Procs. cited in ref. 5 above.Google Scholar
10. Zum Gahr, K. H., Z. Metallkunde 73, p. 267(1982).Google Scholar
11. Kishore, C., Chattopadhyay, N. and Sudarsan, K., Acta Metall. 35, p. 1463(1987).Google Scholar
12. Imura, T., Hasegawa, K., Moori, M., Nishiwaki, T., Takagi, M. and Kawamura, Y., Mater. Sci. & Engin. A133, p. 332(1991).Google Scholar
13. Lee, D.-H. and Evetts, J. E., Acta Metall. 32, p. 1035(1984).Google Scholar
14. Kasai, T., Rigney, D.A. and Zharin, A., Scripta Metall. 39, p. 561(1998).Google Scholar
15. Waniuk, T.A., Busch, R., Masuhr, A. and Johnson, W.L., Acta Mater. 46, p. 5229(1998).Google Scholar
16. Gebert, A., Eckeert, J. and Schultz, L., Acta Mater. 46, p. 5475(1998).Google Scholar
17. Leonhard, A., Xing, L.Q., Heilmaier, M., Gebert, A., Eckert, J., Schultz, L., submitted to Nanostructured Materials (1998).Google Scholar
18. Sun, X., Schneider, S., Geyer, U., Johnson, W.L. and Nicolet, M.-A., J.Mater.Res. 11, p. 2738 (1996).Google Scholar