Hostname: page-component-669899f699-vbsjw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T14:17:16.203Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transient Photoconductivity in GaAs Films Grown by Molecular Beam Epitaxy.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

A. Werner
Affiliation:
Boston University, College of Engineering, Boston, MA 02215, USA
T. D. Moustakas
Affiliation:
Boston University, College of Engineering, Boston, MA 02215, USA
M. Kunst
Affiliation:
Boston University, College of Engineering, Boston, MA 02215, USA
Get access

Abstract

Hahn-Meitner-Institut, D-1000 Berlin 39, W. Germany Abstract The transient photoconductivity, in MBE grown silicon doped GaAs films, was studied by a contactless microwave conductivity technique. The dark carrier concentration of the investigated films varies from 4 x 1014 cm-3 to 6 x 1017 cm-3. At least two decay channels can be distinguished. An initial fast decay process (t<20 ns), which is excitation intensity dependent, followed by a slower one. The fast decay is tentativly identified with a direct electron-hole recombination and is more pronounced at high excitation intensities and in low impurity materials. The slower decay component is characterized by effective electron lifetimes ranging from 2 µs for low impurity fims up to 100 µs for high impurity samples. It can be concluded that an increase of the Si-concentration leads to an increase in the concentration of hole traps, which quenches the initial electron-hole recombination and decreases the electron decay rate in the microsecond region.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

[1] Abele, J. S., Kremer, R. E., and Blakemore, J. S., J. Appl. Phys. 62, 2432 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Li, J.- R. and Jonscher, A. K., Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2, 233 (1987)Google Scholar
[3] Werner, A., Kunst, M., Christen, J., and Weimann, G., Phys. Rev.B 34, 5918 (1986) 466Google Scholar
[4] Moustakas, T. D. and Friedmann, R. A., Proc. of the Northeast Regional Meeting of the Metalurigal Society, ed. by Green, M.L., Baglin, J.E.E., Chin, G.Y., Deckmann, H. W., Mayo, W., Narasinham, D., p. 263 (1986)Google Scholar
[5] Blakemore, J. S., J. Appl. Phys. 53, R123 (1982)Google Scholar
[6] Nelson, R. J. and Sobers, R. G., J. Appl. Phys. 49, 6103 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Moustakas, T. D. and Weiser, K., Phys. Rev. B 12, 2448 (1975)Google Scholar
[8] Bimberg, D., Christen, J., Werner, A., Kunst, M., Weimann, G., and Schlapp, W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 49, 76 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Yablonovitch, E., Bhat, R., Harbison, J. P., and Logan, R. A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 50, 1197 (1987)Google Scholar
[10] Bimberg, D., Munzel, H., Steckenborn, A., and Christen, J., Phys. Rev. B 31, 7788 (1985)Google Scholar