Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:15:54.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TiO2 Film Morphology, Electron Transport and Electron Lifetime in Ultra-fast Sintered Dye-sensitized Solar Cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2013

Matthew J. Carnie ,
Cecile Charbonneau ,
Matthew Davies ,
Ian Mabbett ,
Trystan Watson  and
David Worsley
Matthew J. Carnie
Affiliation:
SPECIFIC, College of Engineering, Swansea University, Baglan Bay Innovation and Knowledge Centre, Central Avenue, Baglan SA12 7AX.
Cecile Charbonneau
Affiliation:
SPECIFIC, College of Engineering, Swansea University, Baglan Bay Innovation and Knowledge Centre, Central Avenue, Baglan SA12 7AX.
Matthew Davies
Affiliation:
SPECIFIC, College of Engineering, Swansea University, Baglan Bay Innovation and Knowledge Centre, Central Avenue, Baglan SA12 7AX. School of Chemistry, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK
Ian Mabbett
Affiliation:
SPECIFIC, College of Engineering, Swansea University, Baglan Bay Innovation and Knowledge Centre, Central Avenue, Baglan SA12 7AX.
Trystan Watson
Affiliation:
SPECIFIC, College of Engineering, Swansea University, Baglan Bay Innovation and Knowledge Centre, Central Avenue, Baglan SA12 7AX.
David Worsley*
Affiliation:
SPECIFIC, College of Engineering, Swansea University, Baglan Bay Innovation and Knowledge Centre, Central Avenue, Baglan SA12 7AX.
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

With the application of near-infrared radiation (NIR), TiO2 films for dye-sensitized solar cells (DSCs) on metallic substrates can be sintered in just 12.5 s. The photovoltaic performance of devices made with NIR sintered films match those devices made with conventionally sintered films prepared by heating for 1800 s. Here we characterise the electron transport, electron lifetime and phase-morphological properties of ultrafast NIR sintered films, using impedance spectroscopy, transient photovoltage decay and x-ray diffraction measurements. An important factor in NIR processing of TiO2 films is the peak metal temperature (PMT) and we show that during the 12.5 second heat treatment that a PMT of around 635 °C gives near identical electron transport, electron lifetime and morphological properties, as well comparable photovoltaic performance to a conventionally sintered (500 °C, 30 mins) film. What is perhaps most interesting is that the rapid heating of the TiO2 (to temperatures of up to 785°C) does not lead to a large scale rutile phase transition. As such photovoltaic performance of resultant DSC devices is maintained even though the TiO2 has been at temperatures which traditionally would have reduced cell photocurrents via anatase-to-rutile phase transition.

Keywords

photovoltaicsinteringenergy generation
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1493: Symposium E/H – Photovoltaic Technologies, Devices and Systems Based on Inorganic Materials, Small Organic Molecules and Hybrids , 2013 , pp. 121 - 126
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ito, S., Ha, N-L. C., Rothenberger, G., Liska, P., Comte, P., Zakeeruddin, S. M., Péchy, P., Nazeeruddin, M. K. and Grätzel, M., Chem. Commun., 2006, 38, 4004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Regan, B. C. and Grätzel, M., Nature, 1991, 353, 737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommeling, P. M., O’Regan, B. C., Haswell, R. R., Smit, H. J. P., Bakker, N. J., Smits, J. J. T., Kroon, J. M., and van Roosmalen, J. A. M., J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006. 110, 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ito, S., Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells, 2010, EPFL Press.Google Scholar
Ito, S., Murakami, T. N., Comte, P., Liska, P., Grätzel, C., Nazeeruddin, M. K. and Grätzel, M., Thin Solid Films, 2008, 516, 4613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliman, P. J., Mohsen, M., Connell, A., Davies, M. L., Al-Salihi, K., Pitak, M. B., Tizzard, G. J., Coles, S. J., Harrington, R. W., Clegg, W., Serpa, C., Fontes, O. H., Charbonneau, C. and Carnie, M. J., J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 13318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, T., Mabbett, I., Wang, H., Peter, L. and Worsley, D., Prog. Photovoltaics, 2011, 19, 482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, T., Charbonneau, C., Carnie, M., Mabbett, I., Cherrington, M. and Worsley, D., MRS Proceedings, 2012, 1447.Google Scholar
Cherrington, M., Claypole, T. C., Deganello, D., Mabbett, I., Watson, T. and Worsley, D., J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 7562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charboneau, C., Hooper, K., Carnie, M., Searle, J., Philip, B., Wragg, D., Watson, T. and Worsley, D., Prog. Photovoltaics. Article in press.Google Scholar
Barnes, P. R. F., Miettunenl, K., Li, X., Anderson, A. Y., Gratzel, M. and O’Regan, B. C.. Adv. Mater. 2012. Article In Press.Google Scholar
Czanderna, A. W., Rao, C. N. R. and Honig, J. M., Trans. Faraday Soc., 1958, 54.Google Scholar
Park, N. G., van de Lagemaat, J. and Frank, A. J., J. Phys. Chem. B, 2000, 104, 8989 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, H., Prasad, K., Sanjinès, R., Schmid, P. E. and Lévy, F., J. App. Phys., 1994, 75, 2042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, M. A. and Dulay, M. T., Chem. Rev., 1993, 93, 341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, A., Davies, R. and Worsley, D., Chem. Soc. Rev., 1993, 22, 417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar