Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T07:23:50.959Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermal Expansion and Viscosity of Confined Liquids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Shuangyan Xu
Affiliation:
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, U.S.A.
Gregory C. Simmons
Affiliation:
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, U.S.A.
George W. Scherer
Affiliation:
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

The thermal expansion and viscosity of water and salt solutions in porous silica glasses have been systematically investigated, and the effect of salts on the properties of water in confined geometry has been addressed. A dilatometric method has been devised and utilized to measure the thermal expansion of confined liquids. A beam-bending method that was developed to study the permeability of porous bodies has been used to measure the relative viscosity of salt solutions to water inside the silica pores. This work has demonstrated that water when confined in nanopores shows anomalous behavior and its thermal expansion is higher than bulk water. This work has also suggested that the presence of ions in water could enhance the anomaly of water in confined space and the extent of the ion effect is dependent on the ion charge.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Gallo, P., Ricci, M.A., and Rovere, M., J. Chem. Phys. 116 342 (2002).Google Scholar
2. Soper, A. K., Bruni, F., and Ricci, M. A., J. Chem. Phys. 109 1486 (1998).Google Scholar
3. Spohr, E., Hartning, C., Gallo, P. and Rovere, M., J. Mol. Liq. 80 165 (1999).Google Scholar
4. Fousri, A., Sorbez-Sridi, R., and Oumezzine, M., Eur. Phys. J. AP 22 21 (2003).Google Scholar
5. Hirama, Y., Takahashi, T., Hino, M., and Sato, T., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 184 349 (1996).Google Scholar
6. Etzler, F. M., Langmuir 4 878 (1988).Google Scholar
7. Karasev, V. V., Derjaguin, B. V., and Khromova, E. N., In Collection Researches in Surface Forces, (Consultants Bureau, New York, 3 1971) pp. 2528.Google Scholar
8. Derjaguin, B. V., Karasev, V. V., and Khromova, E. N., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 109 586 (1986).Google Scholar
9. Takei, T., Mukasa, K., Fuji, M., Watanabe, T., Chikazawa, M., and Kanazawa, T., Colloid Po-lym. Sci. 278 475 (2000).Google Scholar
10. Etzler, F. M. and Fagundus, D. M., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 115 513 (1987)Google Scholar
11. Bowen, W. R. and Yousef, H. N.S., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 264 452 (2003).Google Scholar
12. Dhinojwala, A. and Granick, S., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119 241 (1997)Google Scholar
13. Valenza, J.J. and Scherer, G.W., “Evidence of anomalous thermal expansion of water in cement paste”, submitted to Cem. Concr. Res.Google Scholar
14. Scherer, G. W., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 142 18 (1992).Google Scholar
15. Scherer, G. W., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 83 2231 (2000).Google Scholar
16. Vichit-Vadakan, W. and Schererm, G. W., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 83 2240 (2000).Google Scholar
17. Kraus, G. A., Chem. Rev. 65 177 (1965)Google Scholar
18. Kohlmeyer, A., Hartnig, C., and Spohr, E., J. Mol. Liq. 78 233 (1998).Google Scholar