Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:10:02.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Theoretical Studies of Structure and Doping of Hydrogenated Amorphous Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2011

Bin Cai
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Ohio University Athens, OH 45701, U.S.A.
D. A. Drabold
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Ohio University Athens, OH 45701, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

In a-Si:H, large concentrations of B or P (of order 1%) are required to dope the material, suggesting that doping mechanisms are very different than for the crystal for which much smaller concentrations are required. In this paper, we report simulations on B and P introduced into realistic models of a-Si:H and a-Si, with concentrations ranging from 1.6% to 12.5% of B or P in the amorphous host. The results indicate that tetrahedral B and P are effective doping configurations in a-Si, but high impurity concentrations introduce many defect states. For a-Si:H, we report that both B(3,1) and P(3,1) (B or P atom bonded with three Si atoms and one H atom) are effective doping configurations. We investigate H passivation in both cases. For both B and P, there exists a “hydrogen poison range” of order 6 Å for which H in a bond-center site can suppress doping. For B doping, nearby H prefers to stay at the bond-center of Si-Si, leaves B four-fold and neutralizes the doping configuration; for P doping, nearby H spoils the doping by inducing a reconstruction rendering initially tetrahedral P three-fold.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Street, R. A., Hydrogenated Amorphous Silicon, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2002).Google Scholar
2. Santos, I., Castrillo, P., Windl, W., Drabold, D. A., Pelaz, L. and Marques, L.A., Phys. Rev. B 81, 033203 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevB.81.033203Google Scholar
3. Stutzmann, M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 70, (1986). M. Stutzmann, D. K. Biegelsen, R. A. Street, Phys. Rev. B 35, 5666–5701(1987).10.1557/PROC-70-203Google Scholar
4. Boyce, J. B. and Ready, S. E., Phys. Rev. B 38, 11008 (1998).10.1103/PhysRevB.38.11008Google Scholar
5. Fedders, P. A. and Drabold, D. A., Phys. Rev. B 56, 1864 (1997).10.1103/PhysRevB.56.1864Google Scholar
6. Kresse, G. and Furthmuller, J., Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169. http://cmp.univie.ac.at/vasp/.10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169Google Scholar
7. Drabold, D. A., European Physical Journal B 68, 1(2009). See esp. pp. 1819.10.1140/epjb/e2009-00080-0Google Scholar