Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T06:26:36.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Theoretical Examination of Mems Microactuator Responses with an Emphasis on Materials and Fabrication

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

D.E. Glumac ,
T.G. Cooney ,
L.F. Francis  and
W.P. Robbins
D.E. Glumac
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Minneapolis, MN 55455
T.G. Cooney
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Minneapolis, MN 55455
L.F. Francis
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Minneapolis, MN 55455
W.P. Robbins
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Minneapolis, MN 55455
Get access

Abstract

A free standing cantilever beam consisting of a support structural material (polysilicon/silicon nitride), a piezoelectric PZT ceramic layer, and metal electrode layers has been analyzed. Beam theory and finite element analysis were used to model the electric field induced deflections of this structure, and provided information as to how material choices influenced actuator function. Both support material and PZT thicknesses varied from 0-1.0 gim, and bulk piezoelectric coefficients and elastic moduli were assumed. The beam theory uses known (or assumed) material properties to predict actuator responses. Conversely, if device responses can be measured, material properties may be inferred from the theory. For a PZT thickness of 0.3 μm, a core layer thickness of 0.13 μm was found to maximize displacement. Also, the force output was found to be more dependent on the core thickness than that of the PZT. This information can then be used to predict the response of a more complex microactuator.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 360 , 1994 , 407
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

references

1.Robbins, W.P., Polla, D.L., Tamagawa, T., Glumac, D.E., and Tjhen, W., J. Micromech. Microeng. 1, 247–52 (1991).Google Scholar
2.Glumac, D.E., Rizq, R.N., Robbins, W.P., Polla, D.L., and Nelson, J.C. in Electronic Packaging Materials Science VII, edited by Borgesen, P., Jensen, K.F., and Pollak, R.A. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 323, Pittsburgh, PA, 1994) pp. 419–424.Google Scholar
3.Schiller, P.J., Monolithic Smart Sensor Systems Based on PZT Thin Films, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minnesota (1994).Google Scholar
4.Smits, J.G., Dalke, S.I., and Cooney, T.K., Sensors and Actuators A 28, 41–61 (1991).Google Scholar
5.Meng, Q., Mehregany, M., and Deng, K., J. Micromech. Microeng. 3, 18–23 (1993).Google Scholar
6.Timoshenko, S.P. and Gere, J.M., Mechanics of Materials (Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, 1972).Google Scholar
7.Schwietz, J., MRS Bulletin 27, 34–45 (1992).Google Scholar
8. Ibid 6.Google Scholar
9. Ibid 6.Google Scholar
10. Ibid 5.Google Scholar