Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:33:01.247Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Temperature Dependence of Ion Irradiation Induced Amorphization of Zirconolite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

K.L. Smith
Affiliation:
Materials Division, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, P.M.B. 1, Menai, NSW 2234, AUSTRALIA
M.G. Blackford
Affiliation:
Materials Division, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, P.M.B. 1, Menai, NSW 2234, AUSTRALIA
G.R. Lumpkin
Affiliation:
Materials Division, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, P.M.B. 1, Menai, NSW 2234, AUSTRALIA
N.J. Zaluzec
Affiliation:
Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Ave, Argonne, II 60439, USA
Get access

Abstract

The critical dose for amorphisation, Dc, of two end-member zirconolites (CaZrTi2O7) with different stacking fault densities, was measured as a function of irradiation temperature from 20 K to 623 K using the HVEM-Tandem Facility at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). Below 473 K, the Dc, values of both samples are identical within experimental error, showing only a small increase in Dc, from (2.5 to 4.6) × 1018 ions m−2 between 20 K and 473 K. At temperatures above 473 K, the data for the zirconolite containing many stacking faults is bracketed by two data sets from almost crystallographically perfect end-member zirconolites: one collected in this study and one collected in a previous study. The raw Dc versus temperature data from the zirconolites in this and a previous study suggest that the critical temperature above which samples cannot be amorphised and/or recrystallisation is complete, Tc, is between 600 and 1000 K. The data sets collected in this study are discussed in relation to a current model.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Ewing, R.C., Weber, W.J. and Clinard, F.W. Jr, Progress in Nuclear Energy, 29 [2], 63127 (1995).Google Scholar
[2] Lumpkin, G.R., Smith, K.L., Blackford, M.G. Giere, R. and Williams, C.T., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 506, 215222 (1998).Google Scholar
[3] Jostsons, A., Vance, E.R. and Ebbingaus, B. (1999) Immobilisation of surplus plutonium in titanate ceramics, presented at Global'99 “Nuclear Technology - Bridging the Millenia”, Jackson Hole, Wyoming, USA, Aug. 29 - Sept. 3 1999.Google Scholar
[4] Vance, E.R., Ball, C.J., Blackford, M.G., Cassidy, D.J. and Smith, K.L., J. Nucl. Mater., 175, p.5866 (1990).Google Scholar
[5] Gupta, P.K., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 76(5), 10881095 (1993).Google Scholar
[6] Hobbs, L.W., Seeram, A.N., Jesurum, C.E. and Berger, B.A., Nucl. Instruments and Meths. in Phys Res., B116, 1825 (1996).Google Scholar
[7] Wang, S.X., Wang, L.M. and Ewing, R.C., Nuc. Instruments and Meths. in Phys. Res., B127/128, 186190 (1997).Google Scholar
[8] Weber, W.J., Ewing, R.C. and Wang, L.M., J. Mater. Res., 9(3), 688698 (1994).Google Scholar
[9] Ringwood, A.E., Kesson, S.E., Reeve, K.D., Levins, D.M. and Ramm, E.J. (1988) Synroc, in Radioactive Waste Forms for the Future, edited by Lutze, W. and Ewing, R.C., Elsevier, p.233334.Google Scholar
[10] Smith, K.L., Lumpkin, G.R. and Zaluzec, N.J., J. Nucl. Materials, 250, 3652 (1997).Google Scholar
[11] Wang, S.X., Lumpkin, G.R., Wang, L.M. and Ewing, R.C., in Radiation Effects in Insulators, REI-10, July 18-23, 1999, Jena, Germany (1999).Google Scholar
[12] White, T. J., Mitamura, H., Hojou, K. and Furuno, S., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 333, 227232 (1994).Google Scholar
[13] Clinard, F.W. Jr, Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull., 65, 1181–87 (1986).Google Scholar
[14] Meldrum, A., Zinkle, S.J., Boatner, L.A. and Ewing, R.C., Phys Rev. B, 59(6) 39813992 (1999)Google Scholar