Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:03:45.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Systematic Errors in the Analysis of the Infrared Transmission Data Of Hydrogenated Amorphous Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

N. Maley
Affiliation:
Coordinated Science Laboratory and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801.
I. Szafranek
Affiliation:
Coordinated Science Laboratory and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801.
Get access

Abstract

The validity of the Brodsky, Cardona and Cuomo (BCC) [1] and the Connell and Lewis (CL) [2] methods to analyze infrared transmission data of hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) was examined using computer simulations. Transmission spectra for a-Si:H films 0-5¼m thick and containing up to 30 atomic% hydrogen were simulated assuming coherent reflections in the film and incoherent reflections in the c-Si substrate. Analysis of the simulated data for the 640cm−1 Si-H wagging mode shows that the BCC and CL techniques systematically overestimate the absorption coefficeint, α, and hence hydrogen content, CH, when the film thickness, d, is less than ∼l¼m. The error is nearly independent of CH and is as large as 80% in the limit d→0. On this basis, previously reported experimental evidence for the dependence of CH on d is shown to be an analysis artifact. A simple method to correct the hydrogen content determined by the BCC or CL analysis using only the film thickness is presented.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brodsky, M., Cardona, M., and Cuomo, J., Phys. Rev. B16. 3556 (1977).Google Scholar
2) Connell, G.and Lewis, A., Phys. Stat. Solidi B60, 291 (1973).Google Scholar
3) Maley, N., to be published.Google Scholar
4) MacLeod, H. A., Thin Film Optical Filters. 2nd edition (Adam Hilger, Bristol, 1986).Google Scholar
5) Freeman, E.and Paul, W., Phys. Rev. B18. 4288 (1978).Google Scholar
6) Hasegawa, S. and Imai, Y., Phil. Mag. B46. 239 (1982).Google Scholar
7) Currie, J., Depelsenaire, F., Galarneau, S., Lecuyer, J., Groleau, R., Bruyere, J., and Deneuville, A., J. de Physique 42, L373 (1981).Google Scholar