Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T03:36:45.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surface Preparation Techniques for the Atomic Layer Deposition of Hafnium Oxide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Laura Nyns
Affiliation:
[email protected], Imec, SPDT, Kapeldreef 75, Heverlee, N/A, 3001, Belgium, +32-16-28.11.70, +32-16-28.12.14
Lindsey Hall
Affiliation:
[email protected], Texas Instruments, Silicon Technology Development, P.O. Box 650311, Dallas, Texas, 75265, United States
Thierry Conard
Affiliation:
[email protected], IMEC, Kapeldreef 75, Heverlee, N/A, 3001, Belgium
Annelies Delabie
Affiliation:
[email protected], IMEC, Kapeldreef 75, Heverlee, N/A, 3001, Belgium
Wim Deweerd
Affiliation:
[email protected], IMEC, Kapeldreef 75, Heverlee, N/A, 3001, Belgium
Marc Heyns
Affiliation:
[email protected], IMEC, Kapeldreef 75, Heverlee, N/A, 3001, Belgium
Sven Van Elshocht
Affiliation:
[email protected], IMEC, Kapeldreef 75, Heverlee, N/A, 3001, Belgium
Nausikaa Van Hoornick
Affiliation:
[email protected], IMEC, Kapeldreef 75, Heverlee, N/A, 3001, Belgium
Chris Vinckier
Affiliation:
[email protected], KULeuven, Department of Chemistry, Celestijnenlaan 200F, Heverlee, N/A, 3001, Belgium
Stefan De Gendt
Affiliation:
[email protected], IMEC, Kapeldreef 75, Heverlee, N/A, 3001, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

Atomic layer deposition (ALD) has been successfully used over the years for the deposition of conformal dielectric layers with precise thickness down to the nanometer scale. Therefore, optimization of the growth behaviour of the dielectric is mandatory. Since ALD is a surface sensitive growth technique, determined by the amount of available reaction sites at the starting surface, the impact of various wet chemical and thermal Si treatments on the HfO2 growth was evaluated. Thin SiO2 starting layers, based on wet chemical processing, were prepared by using a diluted peroxide mixture and an ozone/DI-water treatment. The thermally grown oxides were gradually etched by slowly immersing the oxidized Si substrate into a diluted HF solution, creating a thickness range on a single wafer. Our results demonstrate that the HfO2 deposition is more dependent on the thickness of the SiO2 layer than on the chemistry used to grow the oxide layer. For all studied oxides, two regions can clearly be distinguished. First, a linear relationship between the oxide thickness and the amount of deposited HfO2 is seen. Because chemical oxides tend to grow in islands, this trend can be explained by an increase in density of surface OH groups when the oxide grows thicker. When an ellipsometric thickness of ~0.8 nm is reached, saturation of the HfO2 growth is obtained. We believe that, from this thickness on, the starting surface is completely covered with hydroxyl groups, leaving the HfO2 growth only dependent on the ALD process itself. Since both the wet chemical as the thermal oxides are showing the same trend in HfO2 deposition, it can be stated that surface preparations can be selected solely based on their ease of processing. However, the electrical results show that there may be a difference between the ozone based wet chemical oxides and the etched thermal oxides, since the latter seems to possess slightly more leakage current. The electrical results will be discussed in more detail during the presentation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ragnarsson, L.Å., Severi, S., Trojman, L., Johnson, K. D., Brunco, D. P., Aoulaiche, M., Houssa, M., Kauerauf, T., Degraeve, R., Delabie, A., Kaushik, V. S., Groenseneken, G., Meyer, K. De Gendt, S. De, and Heyns, M., to be published in IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 53(7), (2006).Google Scholar
2 Delabie, A., Caymax, M., Brijs, B., Brunco, D., Conard, T., Sleeckx, E., Elshocht, S. Van, Ragnarsson, L.-Å., Gendt, S. De, and Heyns, M., to be published in J. Electrochem. Soc. 153 (8), (2006).Google Scholar
3 Kamiyama, S., Miura, T. and Nara, Y., Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 132904 (2005).Google Scholar
4 Kirsch, P. D., Quevedo-Lopez, M. A., Li, H.-J., Senzaki, Y., Peterson, J. J., Song, S. C., Krishnan, S. A., Moumen, N., Barnett, J., Bersuker, G., Hung, P. Y., Lee, B. H., Lafford, T., Wang, Q., Gay, D., and Ekerdt, J. G., J. Appl. Phys. 99, 023508 (2006).Google Scholar
5 Puurunen, R. L., J. Appl. Phys. 97 (12), 121301 (2005).Google Scholar
6 Green, M. L., Yo, M. Y., Busch, B., Wilk, G. D., Sorsch, T., Conard, T., Brijs, B., Vandervorst, W., Räisänen, P. I., Muller, D., Bude, M., Grazul, J., J. Appl. Phys. 92 (12), 7168 (2002).Google Scholar
7 Gusev, E. P., Cabral, C., Copel, M., D'Emic, C., and Gribelyuk, M., Microelectron. Eng. 69, 145 (2003).Google Scholar
8 Onsia, B., Caymax, M., Conard, T., Gendt, S. De, Smedt, F. De, Delabie, A., Gottschalk, C., Green, M., Heyns, M., Lin, S., Mertens, P., Tsai, W. and Vinckier, C., Solid State Phenomena 103–104, 19 (2005).Google Scholar
9 Meuris, M., Mertens, P. W., Opdebeeck, A., Schmidt, H. F., Depas, M., Vereecke, G., Heyns, M. M. and Philipossian, A., Solid State Technology 38 (7), 109 (1995).Google Scholar
10 ALCVD, PULSAR and Polygon are trademarks of ASM International, the NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
11 Hellin, D., Delabie, A., Puurunen, R. L., Beaven, P., Conard, T., Brijs, B., Gendt, S. De and Vinckier, C., Anal. Sci. 21, 845 (2005).Google Scholar
12 Aoyama, T., Yamazaki, T., and Ito, T., J. Electrochem. Soc. 143 (7), 2280 (1996).Google Scholar