Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:42:13.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Surface Modification of Cyclic Olefinic Copolymers for Bio-Mems Microfluidic Devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

C. Ahn ,
S. Kim ,
H. Chao ,
S. Murugesan  and
G. Beaucage
C. Ahn
Affiliation:
Center for BioMEMS and Microchannels, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45221.
S. Kim
Affiliation:
Center for BioMEMS and Microchannels, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45221.
H. Chao
Affiliation:
Center for BioMEMS and Microchannels, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45221.
S. Murugesan
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45221.
G. Beaucage
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45221.
Get access

Abstract

Cyclic Olefin copolymers (COC) are a new class of polymers that may prove to be extremely useful in injection molding of micron scale fluidic devices. In microfluidic devices it is desirable to have a hydrophilic surface such as in flow driven by capillary action. However, such hydrophilic surfaces tend to display protein deposition when contacted with blood unlike hydrophobic surfaces. Alternatives to capillary action are then needed to control fluid flow for hydrophobic surfaces. Our goal in this research is to tune the slightly hydrophobic COC surfaces through simple surface modifications that are amenable to injection molding and other processing methods. In this study, the surface of an injection molded microfluidic component made from COC was modified in order to change the surface properties important to bio-fluidic devices. Some of the techniques used in this study were plasma treatments and ASG (aerosol gel) coating. Plasma treatments were conducted by using O2, CF4 and their combination gas. O2 treated surfaces became hydrophilic with increasing time of treatment. Combining O2 and CF4 made the surfaces more hydrophobic compared to CF4 only. The structural changes after the plasma treatments were examined by ATR (Attenuated Total Reflectance) spectroscopy. Titania and silica particles from the ASG process were synthesized from titanium iso-propoxide and tetraethoxysilane, respectively. Titania coated surfaces became more hydrophilic and the silica coated surfaces did not have much change in their surface characteristics. The hydrophobicity of the plastic surfaces was measured by their contact angle with water. The implication of these treatments on bio-fluidic devices and their adaptation to the injection molding process will also be discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 729: Symposium U – MEMS and BioMEMS , 2002 , U3.15
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1) Ruckenstein, E. and Gourisankar, S. V., J. Colloid Interface Sci., 101, 436, 1984.Google Scholar
2) Rather, B. D., Weathersby, P. K., Hoffman, A. S., Kelly, M. A. and Scharpen, L. H., J. Appl. Polymer Sci., 22, 643, 1978.Google Scholar
3) Sharma, A. K., Millich, F., and Hellmuth, E. W., J. Appl. Polymer Sci., 26, 2205, 1981.Google Scholar
4) Yasuda, H., Sarma, A. K., and Yesuda, T., J. Polymer Sci. Polymer Phys. Ed., 19, 1285, 1981.Google Scholar
5) Briggs, D., Rance, D.G., Kendall, C. R., and Blythe, A. R., Polymer, 21, 895,1980.Google Scholar
6) Nuzzo, R. G., and Smolinski, G., Macromolecules, 17, 1013, 1984.Google Scholar
7) Rasmussen, J. R., Strdronsky, E. R., and Whitesides, G. M., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 99, 4736, 1977.Google Scholar
8) Noda, I. S., US Patent, 4735843, 1988.Google Scholar
9) Seo, J., Ertekin, E., Pio, S., and Lee, L. P. 15th IEEE international MEMS conference, Las Vegas, 2002.Google Scholar
10) Wenzel, R. N., Ind. Eng. Chem., 28, 988, 1936 Google Scholar