Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:04:42.038Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Study of Dynamic Embrittlement in Alloy Bicrystals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

R. G. Muthiah
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
J. A. Pfaendtner
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
C. J. McMahon Jr
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
P. Lejcek
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague
V. Paidar
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague
Get access

Abstract

In a kinetic model [1] for the phenomenon of dynamic embrittlement, the cracking rate is predicted to be proportional to the diffusivity of the embrittling species along the grain boundary. To test this model, bicrystals of Cu-Sn and Fe-Si with Σ5 symmetrical tilt boundaries are used in which tin and sulfur, respectively, are the embrittling elements. The diffusivities parallel and perpendicular to the tilt axis are expected to be different, therefore the crack growth rates in these two directions should vary in the same ratio as the diffusivities.

Preliminary measurements of crack growth rate along the [100] direction in the Cu-Sn alloy bicrystal are presented. The cracking occurred by decohesion along the grain boundary with almost no observable plasticity. The steady state crack growth was found to be approximately 10∼6 m/sec.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bika, D. and McMahon, C. J. Jr, Acta Metall, et Mater., 43, 1909 (1995).Google Scholar
2. Bika, D., Pfaendtner, J. A., Menyhard, M., and McMahon, C. J. Jr Acta Metall, et Mater., 43, 1895 (1995).Google Scholar
3. Bika, D. and McMahon, C. J. Jr, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 238, 399 (1992).Google Scholar
4. Barrera, E. V., Menyhard, M., Bika, D., Rothman, B. and McMahon, C. J. Jr, Scripta Metall. 27, 205 (1992).Google Scholar
5. Lewandowski, J. J., Hippsley, C. A. and Knott, J. F., Acta Metall. 35, 2081 (1987)Google Scholar
6. Misra, R. D. K., McMahon, C. J. Jr, and Guha, A., Scripta Metall, et Mater., 31, 1471 (1995).Google Scholar
7. Muthiah, R. C., Guha, A., and McMahon, C. J. Jr, 7th Intnl. Conf. on Intergranular and Interphase Boundaries in Materials, Lisbon, June 1995 (Proceedings in press).Google Scholar
8. Chang, K.-M., Henry, M. F. and Benz, M. G., JOM, December, 1990, p. 29.Google Scholar
9. Hayes, R. W., Smith, D. F., Wanner, E. A. and Earthman, J. C., Mater. Sci. and Eng. A000, 43 (1993).Google Scholar
10. Liu, C. T. and White, C. L., Acta Metall., 35, 643 (1987).Google Scholar
11. Hippsley, C. A. and DeVan, J. H., Acta Metall. 37, 1485 (1989).Google Scholar
12. Tada, H., Paris, P., Irwin, G., in The Stress Analysis of Cracks Handbook, Del Research Corporation (1973)Google Scholar