Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:56:37.654Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Study of Aluminum Degasification with Impeller-Injector Assisted by Physical Modeling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2013

M. Hernández-Hernández ,
E. A. Ramos-Gómez  and
M. A. Ramírez-Argáez
M. Hernández-Hernández
Affiliation:
Facultad de Química, UNAM, Departamento de Ingeniería Metalúrgica. Edificio “D” Circuito de los Institutos s/n, Col. Cd. Universitaria, C.P. 04510 México D.F., México.
E. A. Ramos-Gómez
Affiliation:
Facultad de Química, UNAM, Departamento de Ingeniería Metalúrgica. Edificio “D” Circuito de los Institutos s/n, Col. Cd. Universitaria, C.P. 04510 México D.F., México.
M. A. Ramírez-Argáez
Affiliation:
Facultad de Química, UNAM, Departamento de Ingeniería Metalúrgica. Edificio “D” Circuito de los Institutos s/n, Col. Cd. Universitaria, C.P. 04510 México D.F., México.
Get access

Abstract

A full-scale water physical model of a degassing unit is built and used to evaluate the performance of several impeller designs. Four impeller designs are tested: a) one smooth not commercial impeller for reference purposes, b) a commercial design by FOSECO®, called standard impeller in this work, c) a commercial design by FOSECO® with notches, and d) a new design proposed in this work. Since the physical model is easy and safe to operate, a full experimental design is performed to evaluate the effect of the most important process variables, such as impeller rotating speed, gas flow rate, impeller design and the point of gas injection (a conventional gas injection through the shaft and a novel method of injecting gas through the bottom of the ladle) on the kinetics of oxygen desorption of water which is similar to dehydrogenation of liquid aluminum. The new design of impeller proposed in this work shows the best performance in degassing of all impellers tested in this study. It is found that the rotor speed and its design are the most significant variables affecting degassing kinetics, and therefore the analysis of the existing commercial impeller designs may be useful to optimize the fluid dynamics of the process, which in turn would increase efficiency and productivity of the process. Finally, the novel gas injection method through the bottom, proposed by our own group, presents slightly faster degassing kinetics than the conventional injection of purge gas in the conventional way through the impeller.

Keywords

ALsimulationchemical reaction
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1485: Symposium 7D – Advanced Structural Materials—2012 , 2012 , pp. 41 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Sigworth, G. K. and Engh, T. A., “Chemical and kinetic Factors Related to Hydrogen Removal from Aluminum”, Metall. Trans. B, 13, (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, J. G. and Yu, H.. Light Metals. 121, (1992), The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society (TMS), Warrendale, PA, USA.Google Scholar
Szekely, J., “Fenómenos de Flujo de Fluidos en el Procesamiento de Metales”. Limusa, México, (1988).Google Scholar
Zhang, L., Lv, X., Torgerson, A. T. and Long, M., “Removal of Impurity Elements from Molten Aluminum: A Review”, Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev., 32, (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szekely, J., Evans, J. W. and Brimacombe, J. K., “The Mathematical and Physical Modeling of Primary Metals Processing Operations”. John Wiley & Sons, USA, (1988).Google Scholar
Boeuf, F., Rey, M. y Wuilloud, E., “Metal batch tretment optimisation of rotor runnig condition”, The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, 1993, Vol. Light Metals 1993.Google Scholar
Nilmani, Thay, “A comparative study of impeller performance”. s.l. : The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, 1992, Vol. Light Metals 1992.Google Scholar
Saternus, Mariola and Botor, Jan, “The physical and mathematical model of aluminium refining process in reactor URO – 200”. USA: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, 2005.Google Scholar
Bujalski, Waldemar, “Mixing Studies Related to the cleaning of molten aluminium” 3, Weinheim, Germany: WILEY-VCH, 2004, Vol. 27.Google Scholar
Goufa, Mi, “Research on water simulatiion experiment of the rotating impeller degassing process”, China: Materials Science and Engineering A, 2008. 0921–5093.Google Scholar
Camacho-Martínez, J. L., Ramírez-Argáez, M. A. and Zenit, R, “Physical Modelling of Aluminium Degassing Operation with Rotating Impellers –A Comparative Hydrodynamic Analysis”, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 25, (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar