Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-04T18:06:49.865Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies of the Liquid-Solid Ratio Effect on the Distribution Ratio Rd, in Sorption

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

J. Bors ,
H. N. Erten  and
S. Assemi
J. Bors
Affiliation:
Center of Radiation Protection and Radioecology, University of Hannover, Herrenhäuser Straäe 2, 30419 Hannover, Germany
H. N. Erten
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Bilkent University, 06533 Bilkent, Ankara, Turkey
S. Assemi
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Bilkent University, 06533 Bilkent, Ankara, Turkey
Get access

Abstract

The variation of the distribution ratio Rd as a function of aqueous volume to solid mass ratio (V/M) for several sorption systems involving the cations Zn2+, Co2+, Ba2+, the anion I− and different solid matrices has been extensively examined. Empirical relationships for the concentrations of the sorbed species in the aqueous and solid phases as well as for the distribution ratio Rd are proposed. Generally Rd is found to increase with increasing V/M for tracer concentrations. A gradual increase in the initial concentration of the sorbed species eventually leads to a decrease in Rd with V/M.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 353: Symposium – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVIII , 1994 , 1069
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Benes, P., Strejic, P. and Lukavec, Z., J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 82, 275 (1984).Google Scholar
2. Meier, H., Zimmerhackl, E., Zeitler, G., Menge, P. and Hecker, W., J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 109, 139 (1987).Google Scholar
3. Lieser, K. H. and Steinkopf, Th., Radiochim. Acta, 47, 55 (1987).Google Scholar
4. Cornell, R. M., Clay Minerals, 27, 363 (1992).Google Scholar
5. Gökmenoglu, Z. and Erten, H. N., J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 182, 2 (1994).Google Scholar
7. Assemi, S. and Erten, H. N., J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 178, 193 (1994).Google Scholar
6. Eylem, C., Erten, H. N. and Göktürk, H., Analyst, 114, 351 (1989).Google Scholar
8. Bors, J., Erten, H. N. and Martens, R., Radiochim. Acta, 52/53, 317 (1991).Google Scholar
9. Bors, J. and Gorny, A., Appl. Clay Sci., 7, 245 (1992).Google Scholar
10. Erten, H. N., Aksoyoglu, S. and Göktürk, H., The Sci. Tot. Envir., 69, 269 (1988).Google Scholar