Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-68cz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-21T12:23:21.448Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stress and Microstructural Evolution of Lpcvd Polysilicon Thin Films During High Temperature Annealing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Chia-Liang Yu
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305
Paul A. Flinn
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305
Seok-Hee Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305
John C. Bravman
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305
Get access

Abstract

The mechanisms of stress generation and stress relaxation of LPCVD silicon thin films were studied using high temperature wafer curvature measurements. The stresses generated during depositions are measured as functions of deposition temperature and microstructure. Amorphous silicon deposited with a compressive stress shows a large stress change toward tensile during crystallization. The stress relaxation of polysilicon films deposited with tensile stresses can be described by a deformation model from Ashby and Frost [1]. The polysilicon films deposited with compressive stresses have hydrogen incorporated during deposition and shows hydrogen evolution during thermal cycles.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Ashby, M.F. and Sheng, T.T., in Constitutive Equations in Plasticity, edited by Argon, A.S., (MIT Press, Cabaret, Massachusetts, 1975), p. 117.Google Scholar
2. Krulevitch, P., Johnson, G.C., and Howe, R.T., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 239, 13 (1992).Google Scholar
3. Krulevitch, P., Nguyen, Tai D., Johnson, G.C., Howe, R.T., Wenk, G.R., and Gronsky, R., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 202, 167 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Benrakkad, M.S., Perez-Rodriguez, A., Jahwari, T., Samitier, J., Lopez-Villegas, J.M., and Morante, J.R., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 343, 609 (1994).Google Scholar
5. Koleshiko, V.M., Belitsky, V.F., and Kiryushin, I.V., Thin Solid Films, 162, 365 (1988).Google Scholar
6. Guckel, H., Burns, D.W., Visser, C.C.G., Tilmans, H.A.C., and Deroo, D., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 35, 800 (1988).Google Scholar
7. Howe, R.T. and Muller, R.S., J. Appl. Phys., 54, 4674 (1983).Google Scholar
8. Koleshiko, V.M., Belitsky, V.F., and Kiryushin, I.V., Thin Solid Films, 165, 181 (1988).Google Scholar
9. Flinn, P.A., Mack, A.S., Besser, P.R. and Marieb, T.N., MRS Bulletin, 18, 2635 (1993).Google Scholar
10. Doerner, M.F. and Nix, W.D., CRC Crit. Rev. Solid State Mat. Sci. 11, 317 (1984).Google Scholar
11. Stevens, K.S. and Johnson, N.M., J. Appl. Phys., 71, 2628 (1992).Google Scholar
12. Kamins, T.I., J. Electrochem. Soc., 121, 68 (1974).Google Scholar
13. Flinn, P.A., Gardner, D.S., and W Nix, D., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 34, 689 (1987)Google Scholar